Prescription and switching patterns of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Tim A.C. de Vries , Roisin Bavalia , Gordon Chu , Helen Xiong , Kayleigh M. van de Wiel , Hanne van Ballegooijen , Menno V. Huisman , Martin E.W. Hemels , Saskia Middeldorp , Joris R. de Groot
{"title":"Prescription and switching patterns of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation","authors":"Tim A.C. de Vries ,&nbsp;Roisin Bavalia ,&nbsp;Gordon Chu ,&nbsp;Helen Xiong ,&nbsp;Kayleigh M. van de Wiel ,&nbsp;Hanne van Ballegooijen ,&nbsp;Menno V. Huisman ,&nbsp;Martin E.W. Hemels ,&nbsp;Saskia Middeldorp ,&nbsp;Joris R. de Groot","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The patterns of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) selection and switching to a different oral anticoagulant (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe temporal patterns in first DOAC prescriptions, estimate the incidence, and identify predictors of switching to a different OAC within 1 year in OAC-naive AF patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, using a near-nationwide prescription registry (IQVIA, the Netherlands), we determined the number of patients per month initiated on each DOAC and identified predictors of switching within 1 year with robust Poisson regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 94,874 patients. From November 2015 to November 2019, the monthly use of apixaban (<em>n</em> = 366 to <em>n</em> = 1066, +191%), rivaroxaban (<em>n</em> = 379 to <em>n</em> = 868, +129%), and edoxaban (<em>n</em> = 2 to <em>n</em> = 305, +15,150%) increased, whereas that of dabigatran decreased (<em>n</em> = 317 to <em>n</em> = 179, −44%). In the 66,090 patients with ≥1 year of available calendar time, 7% switched to a different OAC within 1 year. Strong predictors of switching to a different DOAC were using dabigatran (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 3.33; 95% CI, 3.02-3.66) or edoxaban (aRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82) rather than apixaban and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.23-2.88). Strong predictors of switching to a vitamin K antagonist were using rivaroxaban (aRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.54 vs apixaban) and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the Netherlands, factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being selected for OAC-naive AF patients. Seven percent of patients switch to a different OAC within 1 year, and the initial DOAC type and dose are strong predictors of switching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002395/pdfft?md5=3e676a8fe1eef5cad271dceb451f5210&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924002395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The patterns of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) selection and switching to a different oral anticoagulant (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown.

Objectives

To describe temporal patterns in first DOAC prescriptions, estimate the incidence, and identify predictors of switching to a different OAC within 1 year in OAC-naive AF patients.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, using a near-nationwide prescription registry (IQVIA, the Netherlands), we determined the number of patients per month initiated on each DOAC and identified predictors of switching within 1 year with robust Poisson regression.

Results

We included 94,874 patients. From November 2015 to November 2019, the monthly use of apixaban (n = 366 to n = 1066, +191%), rivaroxaban (n = 379 to n = 868, +129%), and edoxaban (n = 2 to n = 305, +15,150%) increased, whereas that of dabigatran decreased (n = 317 to n = 179, −44%). In the 66,090 patients with ≥1 year of available calendar time, 7% switched to a different OAC within 1 year. Strong predictors of switching to a different DOAC were using dabigatran (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 3.33; 95% CI, 3.02-3.66) or edoxaban (aRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82) rather than apixaban and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.23-2.88). Strong predictors of switching to a vitamin K antagonist were using rivaroxaban (aRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.54 vs apixaban) and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77).

Conclusion

In the Netherlands, factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being selected for OAC-naive AF patients. Seven percent of patients switch to a different OAC within 1 year, and the initial DOAC type and dose are strong predictors of switching.

Abstract Image

心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝剂的处方和转换模式
背景心房颤动(房颤)患者选择直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)和改用不同口服抗凝剂(OAC)的模式尚不清楚。目的描述首次开具 DOAC 处方的时间模式,估计发生率,并确定对 OAC 无反应的房颤患者在 1 年内改用不同 OAC 的预测因素。方法在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们利用近乎全国范围的处方登记处(IQVIA,荷兰),确定了每月开始使用每种 DOAC 的患者人数,并通过稳健泊松回归确定了 1 年内转用其他 OAC 的预测因素。从 2015 年 11 月到 2019 年 11 月,阿哌沙班(n = 366 到 n = 1066,+191%)、利伐沙班(n = 379 到 n = 868,+129%)和埃多沙班(n = 2 到 n = 305,+15,150%)的每月使用量有所增加,而达比加群则有所减少(n = 317 到 n = 179,-44%)。在可用日历时间≥1年的66090名患者中,7%的患者在1年内转用了不同的OAC。使用达比加群(调整风险比 [aRR],3.33;95% CI,3.02-3.66)或依度沙班(aRR,1.56;95% CI,1.34-1.82)而非阿哌沙班,以及使用标准 DOAC 剂量(aRR,2.54;95% CI,2.23-2.88)是转用不同 DOAC 的有力预测因素。使用利伐沙班(aRR,1.36;95% CI,1.19-1.54 vs 阿哌沙班)和使用标准 DOAC 剂量(aRR,1.49;95% CI,1.26-1.77)是转用维生素 K 拮抗剂的有力预测因素。7%的患者在 1 年内转用不同的 OAC,而最初的 DOAC 类型和剂量是预测转用的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信