Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Organ Transplant Recipients

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Organ Transplant Recipients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) is critical given clear—albeit attenuated—benefits from vaccination.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adult OTRs were surveyed regarding sociodemographic data, medical history, and vaccine-related values. A novel outcome variable called the Vaccine Acceptance Composite Score (VACS) was built as the average Likert score of seven domains of vaccine confidence. To examine its association with several factors and individual adherence to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, univariable odds ratios and relative operating characteristic areas under the curve (AUC) values were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 46 OTRs included, 32.6% identified as female, 13.3% as Black, and 6.77% as Hispanic or Latino/a/x. The median age was 58 years old. 93.5% of patients were kidney transplant recipients, and 63.0% previously had COVID-19. Patients were most concerned about COVID-19 vaccine-associated risks (46.3%), its potential effect on allograft (47.6%), and motives of government officials involved with vaccine policy (55.6%). Politically conservative patients were likelier to have lower VACS, whereas those who lived with someone ≥65 years old were likelier to have higher VACS. The VACS was not significantly associated with race, income, religious beliefs, comorbidities, COVID-19 history, or influenza vaccination status. Higher VACS was associated with ≥3 and ≥4 COVID-19 immunizations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlighted political beliefs and elderly household members as correlates of vaccine acceptance among OTRs. The VACS may be a useful tool to help standardize multifaceted analyses in vaccination-focused behavioral research. In clinical practice, it could help identify individuals and groups at risk for vaccine hesitancy, who may benefit from tailored outreach and educational interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004536/pdfft?md5=0fa515e6bac129850673efb510c793eb&pid=1-s2.0-S0041134524004536-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) is critical given clear—albeit attenuated—benefits from vaccination.

Methods

Adult OTRs were surveyed regarding sociodemographic data, medical history, and vaccine-related values. A novel outcome variable called the Vaccine Acceptance Composite Score (VACS) was built as the average Likert score of seven domains of vaccine confidence. To examine its association with several factors and individual adherence to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, univariable odds ratios and relative operating characteristic areas under the curve (AUC) values were calculated.

Results

Of 46 OTRs included, 32.6% identified as female, 13.3% as Black, and 6.77% as Hispanic or Latino/a/x. The median age was 58 years old. 93.5% of patients were kidney transplant recipients, and 63.0% previously had COVID-19. Patients were most concerned about COVID-19 vaccine-associated risks (46.3%), its potential effect on allograft (47.6%), and motives of government officials involved with vaccine policy (55.6%). Politically conservative patients were likelier to have lower VACS, whereas those who lived with someone ≥65 years old were likelier to have higher VACS. The VACS was not significantly associated with race, income, religious beliefs, comorbidities, COVID-19 history, or influenza vaccination status. Higher VACS was associated with ≥3 and ≥4 COVID-19 immunizations.

Conclusions

This study highlighted political beliefs and elderly household members as correlates of vaccine acceptance among OTRs. The VACS may be a useful tool to help standardize multifaceted analyses in vaccination-focused behavioral research. In clinical practice, it could help identify individuals and groups at risk for vaccine hesitancy, who may benefit from tailored outreach and educational interventions.

器官移植受者对接种 COVID-19 疫苗的看法。
背景:鉴于器官移植受者(OTR)接种COVID-19疫苗有明显的益处,尽管益处有所减弱,因此了解器官移植受者(OTR)对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫态度至关重要:对成年 OTR 进行了有关社会人口学数据、病史和疫苗相关价值观的调查。一个名为疫苗接受度综合评分(VACS)的新结果变量被建立起来,它是疫苗信心的七个领域的平均 Likert 分数。为了研究其与几个因素和个人对 COVID-19 疫苗建议的依从性之间的关系,计算了单变量几率比例和曲线下相对工作特征区域(AUC)值:在 46 名 OTR 中,32.6% 为女性,13.3% 为黑人,6.77% 为西班牙裔或拉丁裔/a/x。中位年龄为 58 岁。93.5%的患者为肾移植受者,63.0%的患者曾患 COVID-19。患者最关心的是 COVID-19 疫苗相关的风险(46.3%)、其对同种异体移植的潜在影响(47.6%)以及参与疫苗政策制定的政府官员的动机(55.6%)。政治保守的患者 VACS 值较低,而与年龄≥65 岁的人同住的患者 VACS 值较高。VACS与种族、收入、宗教信仰、合并症、COVID-19病史或流感疫苗接种情况无明显关联。较高的 VACS 与≥3 次和≥4 次 COVID-19 免疫接种有关:本研究强调了政治信仰和家庭中的老年人是 OTR 接受疫苗的相关因素。VACS 可能是一个有用的工具,有助于将以疫苗接种为重点的行为研究中的多方面分析标准化。在临床实践中,它可以帮助识别有疫苗接种犹豫风险的个人和群体,这些人可能会从有针对性的宣传和教育干预中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信