Four-year Outcomes of Class III and IV Anterior Restorations Based on a Subset of German Health Insurance Data.

Michael Raedel, Susann Hertel, Heinz-Werner Priess, Aikaterini Mikeli, Vadim Kopzon, Steffen Bohm, Michael H Walter
{"title":"Four-year Outcomes of Class III and IV Anterior Restorations Based on a Subset of German Health Insurance Data.","authors":"Michael Raedel, Susann Hertel, Heinz-Werner Priess, Aikaterini Mikeli, Vadim Kopzon, Steffen Bohm, Michael H Walter","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b5733812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Numerous studies report on the outcome performance of posterior composite restorations. However, there are fewer studies providing data for anterior restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome performance of anterior permanent restorations by analyzing a large dataset from a German national health insurance company.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Routine claims data from a major German national health insurance company were assessed. Fee codes were used for tracing restoration careers on a day-count basis. The treatment was defined as a placed restoration (Class III and IV) on a mesial or distal tooth surface, irrespective of the extension. The restorations were placed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2013. Statistical analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to determine cumulative 4-year survival rates. The primary outcome was re-intervention on the same surface. Secondary outcomes were crowning and extraction which were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,417,791 restorations involving mesial surfaces and a number of 2,409,031 restorations involving distal surfaces were observed. At 4 years, the cumulative survival rates concerning the primary outcome 're-intervention' were 79.9% for mesial and 80.9% for distal restorations. The respective annual failure rates (AFR) were 5.5% and 5.2%. Four-year survival rates for the secondary outcome 'crown' were 93.8% for mesial and 94.1% for distal anterior restorations. The respective AFRs were 1.6% and 1.5%. For the secondary outcome 'extraction,' the respective rates were 94.6% for mesial and 93.9% for distal restorations. The respective AFRs were 1.4% and 1.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of permanent anterior restorations which were placed in general dental practices in Germany can be rated as acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b5733812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Numerous studies report on the outcome performance of posterior composite restorations. However, there are fewer studies providing data for anterior restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome performance of anterior permanent restorations by analyzing a large dataset from a German national health insurance company.

Materials and methods: Routine claims data from a major German national health insurance company were assessed. Fee codes were used for tracing restoration careers on a day-count basis. The treatment was defined as a placed restoration (Class III and IV) on a mesial or distal tooth surface, irrespective of the extension. The restorations were placed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2013. Statistical analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to determine cumulative 4-year survival rates. The primary outcome was re-intervention on the same surface. Secondary outcomes were crowning and extraction which were analyzed separately.

Results: A total of 2,417,791 restorations involving mesial surfaces and a number of 2,409,031 restorations involving distal surfaces were observed. At 4 years, the cumulative survival rates concerning the primary outcome 're-intervention' were 79.9% for mesial and 80.9% for distal restorations. The respective annual failure rates (AFR) were 5.5% and 5.2%. Four-year survival rates for the secondary outcome 'crown' were 93.8% for mesial and 94.1% for distal anterior restorations. The respective AFRs were 1.6% and 1.5%. For the secondary outcome 'extraction,' the respective rates were 94.6% for mesial and 93.9% for distal restorations. The respective AFRs were 1.4% and 1.6%.

Conclusion: The performance of permanent anterior restorations which were placed in general dental practices in Germany can be rated as acceptable.

基于德国医疗保险数据子集的 III 级和 IV 级前牙修复术的四年效果。
目的:许多研究都报道了后牙复合树脂修复体的效果。然而,关于前牙修复体的研究却较少。本研究的目的是通过分析一家德国国家医疗保险公司的大型数据集来评估前牙永久修复体的临床效果:材料和方法:对德国一家大型全国医疗保险公司的常规理赔数据进行了评估。费用代码用于按天计算的修复治疗。治疗的定义是在牙齿中侧或远侧表面进行的修复(III 级和 IV 级),与扩展无关。修复体植入时间为 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日。统计分析采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析法确定累积 4 年生存率。主要结果是在同一表面再次进行干预。次要结果是牙冠和拔牙,分别进行分析:共观察到2,417,791个涉及中轴面的修复体和2,409,031个涉及远轴面的修复体。4年后,与主要结果 "再介入 "相关的累积存活率为:中轴修复为79.9%,远轴修复为80.9%。年失败率(AFR)分别为5.5%和5.2%。在次要结果 "牙冠 "的四年存活率方面,中间修复体为93.8%,远端前牙修复体为94.1%。AFR分别为1.6%和1.5%。在次要结果 "拔牙 "中,中间修复体的存活率为94.6%,远端修复体的存活率为93.9%。结论:结论:德国普通牙科诊所的永久性前牙修复体的性能可以被评为合格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信