Sedative effects of propofol and risk factors for excessive sedation in the endoscopic treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1002/deo2.417
Yuta Maruki, Susumu Hijioka, Shin Yagi, Tetsuro Takasaki, Mark Chatto, Soma Fukuda, Daiki Yamashige, Kouhei Okamoto, Daiki Agarie, Hidenobu Hara, Yuya Hagiwara, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Chigusa Morizane, Miyuki Sone, Takuji Okusaka, Yutaka Saito
{"title":"Sedative effects of propofol and risk factors for excessive sedation in the endoscopic treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases","authors":"Yuta Maruki,&nbsp;Susumu Hijioka,&nbsp;Shin Yagi,&nbsp;Tetsuro Takasaki,&nbsp;Mark Chatto,&nbsp;Soma Fukuda,&nbsp;Daiki Yamashige,&nbsp;Kouhei Okamoto,&nbsp;Daiki Agarie,&nbsp;Hidenobu Hara,&nbsp;Yuya Hagiwara,&nbsp;Yoshikuni Nagashio,&nbsp;Chigusa Morizane,&nbsp;Miyuki Sone,&nbsp;Takuji Okusaka,&nbsp;Yutaka Saito","doi":"10.1002/deo2.417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The safety and effectiveness of propofol in more complex endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, remain unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate propofol sedation during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, ultrasound-guided intervention, and gastroduodenal stenting and examine risk factors for excessive sedation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed data from 870 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment with propofol sedation for biliary and pancreatic disease between October 2020 and September 2021. Sedation included propofol and fentanyl, with continuous monitoring of vital signs and the bispectral index. The assessed risk factors included age, complications, body mass index, treatment duration, and specialty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Distal bile duct treatment (<i>n</i> = 367), hilar bile duct treatment (<i>n</i> = 197), post-small-intestinal reconstruction treatment (<i>n</i> = 75), endoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention (<i>n</i> = 140), and gastrointestinal obstruction treatment (<i>n</i> = 91) were performed. The rates of excessive sedation, hypoxemia, and hypotension were 7.8%, 6.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. Post-small-intestinal reconstruction treatment had the highest incidence rate of excessive sedation (16%), whereas endoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention had the lowest incidence rate (4.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between excessive sedation and comorbid sleep apnea, obesity, and prolonged procedural time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Obesity, sleep apnea syndrome, and prolonged procedure time are risk factors for excessive sedation related to propofol use. Thus, sedation techniques should be tailored for these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The safety and effectiveness of propofol in more complex endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, remain unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate propofol sedation during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, ultrasound-guided intervention, and gastroduodenal stenting and examine risk factors for excessive sedation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 870 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment with propofol sedation for biliary and pancreatic disease between October 2020 and September 2021. Sedation included propofol and fentanyl, with continuous monitoring of vital signs and the bispectral index. The assessed risk factors included age, complications, body mass index, treatment duration, and specialty.

Results

Distal bile duct treatment (n = 367), hilar bile duct treatment (n = 197), post-small-intestinal reconstruction treatment (n = 75), endoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention (n = 140), and gastrointestinal obstruction treatment (n = 91) were performed. The rates of excessive sedation, hypoxemia, and hypotension were 7.8%, 6.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. Post-small-intestinal reconstruction treatment had the highest incidence rate of excessive sedation (16%), whereas endoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention had the lowest incidence rate (4.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between excessive sedation and comorbid sleep apnea, obesity, and prolonged procedural time.

Conclusions

Obesity, sleep apnea syndrome, and prolonged procedure time are risk factors for excessive sedation related to propofol use. Thus, sedation techniques should be tailored for these patients.

Abstract Image

异丙酚的镇静作用以及在胆道和胰腺疾病内窥镜治疗中过度镇静的风险因素。
目的:异丙酚在内镜逆行胰胆管造影等更复杂的内镜手术中的安全性和有效性仍然未知。因此,我们旨在评估在内镜胆管造影术、超声引导介入术和胃十二指肠支架术中使用异丙酚镇静的情况,并研究镇静过度的风险因素:我们回顾性分析了2020年10月至2021年9月期间接受异丙酚镇静内镜治疗的870名胆道和胰腺疾病患者的数据。镇静剂包括异丙酚和芬太尼,并持续监测生命体征和双频谱指数。评估的风险因素包括年龄、并发症、体重指数、治疗时间和专业:结果:进行了远端胆管治疗(367 例)、肝胆管治疗(197 例)、小肠重建术后治疗(75 例)、内镜超声引导下介入治疗(140 例)和胃肠道梗阻治疗(91 例)。过度镇静、低氧血症和低血压的发生率分别为 7.8%、6.0% 和 1.8%。小肠重建后治疗的过度镇静发生率最高(16%),而内窥镜超声引导介入治疗的发生率最低(4.3%)。多变量分析显示,过度镇静与合并睡眠呼吸暂停、肥胖和手术时间延长之间存在明显关联:结论:肥胖、睡眠呼吸暂停综合征和手术时间延长是使用异丙酚导致过度镇静的风险因素。因此,镇静技术应针对这些患者量身定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信