Validity and Reliability of OpenPose-Based Motion Analysis in Measuring Knee Valgus during Drop Vertical Jump Test.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Takumi Ino, Mina Samukawa, Tomoya Ishida, Naofumi Wada, Yuta Koshino, Satoshi Kasahara, Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of OpenPose-Based Motion Analysis in Measuring Knee Valgus during Drop Vertical Jump Test.","authors":"Takumi Ino, Mina Samukawa, Tomoya Ishida, Naofumi Wada, Yuta Koshino, Satoshi Kasahara, Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2024.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OpenPose-based motion analysis (OpenPose-MA), utilizing deep learning methods, has emerged as a compelling technique for estimating human motion. It addresses the drawbacks associated with conventional three-dimensional motion analysis (3D-MA) and human visual detection-based motion analysis (Human-MA), including costly equipment, time-consuming analysis, and restricted experimental settings. This study aims to assess the precision of OpenPose-MA in comparison to Human-MA, using 3D-MA as the reference standard. The study involved a cohort of 21 young and healthy adults. OpenPose-MA employed the OpenPose algorithm, a deep learning-based open-source two-dimensional (2D) pose estimation method. Human-MA was conducted by a skilled physiotherapist. The knee valgus angle during a drop vertical jump task was computed by OpenPose-MA and Human-MA using the same frontal-plane video image, with 3D-MA serving as the reference standard. Various metrics were utilized to assess the reproducibility, accuracy and similarity of the knee valgus angle between the different methods, including the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1, 3), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) for waveform pattern similarity, and Pearson's correlation coefficients (OpenPose-MA vs. 3D-MA, Human-MA vs. 3D-MA). Unpaired t-tests were conducted to compare MAEs and CMCs between OpenPose-MA and Human-MA. The ICCs (1,3) for OpenPose-MA, Human-MA, and 3D-MA demonstrated excellent reproducibility in the DVJ trial. No significant difference between OpenPose-MA and Human-MA was observed in terms of the MAEs (OpenPose: 2.4° [95%CI: 1.9-3.0°], Human: 3.2° [95%CI: 2.1-4.4°]) or CMCs (OpenPose: 0.83 [range: 0.99-0.53], Human: 0.87 [range: 0.24-0.98]) of knee valgus angles. The Pearson's correlation coefficients of OpenPose-MA and Human-MA relative to that of 3D-MA were 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. This study demonstrated that OpenPose-MA achieved satisfactory reproducibility, accuracy and exhibited waveform similarity comparable to 3D-MA, similar to Human-MA. Both OpenPose-MA and Human-MA showed a strong correlation with 3D-MA in terms of knee valgus angle excursion.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OpenPose-based motion analysis (OpenPose-MA), utilizing deep learning methods, has emerged as a compelling technique for estimating human motion. It addresses the drawbacks associated with conventional three-dimensional motion analysis (3D-MA) and human visual detection-based motion analysis (Human-MA), including costly equipment, time-consuming analysis, and restricted experimental settings. This study aims to assess the precision of OpenPose-MA in comparison to Human-MA, using 3D-MA as the reference standard. The study involved a cohort of 21 young and healthy adults. OpenPose-MA employed the OpenPose algorithm, a deep learning-based open-source two-dimensional (2D) pose estimation method. Human-MA was conducted by a skilled physiotherapist. The knee valgus angle during a drop vertical jump task was computed by OpenPose-MA and Human-MA using the same frontal-plane video image, with 3D-MA serving as the reference standard. Various metrics were utilized to assess the reproducibility, accuracy and similarity of the knee valgus angle between the different methods, including the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1, 3), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) for waveform pattern similarity, and Pearson's correlation coefficients (OpenPose-MA vs. 3D-MA, Human-MA vs. 3D-MA). Unpaired t-tests were conducted to compare MAEs and CMCs between OpenPose-MA and Human-MA. The ICCs (1,3) for OpenPose-MA, Human-MA, and 3D-MA demonstrated excellent reproducibility in the DVJ trial. No significant difference between OpenPose-MA and Human-MA was observed in terms of the MAEs (OpenPose: 2.4° [95%CI: 1.9-3.0°], Human: 3.2° [95%CI: 2.1-4.4°]) or CMCs (OpenPose: 0.83 [range: 0.99-0.53], Human: 0.87 [range: 0.24-0.98]) of knee valgus angles. The Pearson's correlation coefficients of OpenPose-MA and Human-MA relative to that of 3D-MA were 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. This study demonstrated that OpenPose-MA achieved satisfactory reproducibility, accuracy and exhibited waveform similarity comparable to 3D-MA, similar to Human-MA. Both OpenPose-MA and Human-MA showed a strong correlation with 3D-MA in terms of knee valgus angle excursion.

基于 OpenPose 的运动分析法在测量垂足立定跳远测试中膝内翻的有效性和可靠性
基于 OpenPose 的运动分析(OpenPose-MA)利用深度学习方法,已成为估算人体运动的一项引人注目的技术。它解决了传统三维运动分析(3D-MA)和基于人类视觉检测的运动分析(Human-MA)的相关缺点,包括昂贵的设备、耗时的分析和有限的实验设置。本研究旨在以三维运动分析为参考标准,评估 OpenPose-MA 与 Human-MA 相比的精确度。研究涉及 21 名年轻健康的成年人。OpenPose-MA 采用了 OpenPose 算法,这是一种基于深度学习的开源二维(2D)姿势估计方法。人体姿势评估由一名熟练的理疗师进行。OpenPose-MA和Human-MA使用相同的额面视频图像计算落体垂直跳跃任务中的膝外翻角度,并将3D-MA作为参考标准。利用各种指标来评估不同方法之间膝外翻角度的重现性、准确性和相似性,包括类内相关系数(ICC)(1, 3)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、波形模式相似性的多重相关系数(CMC)和皮尔逊相关系数(OpenPose-MA vs. 3D-MA, Human-MA vs. 3D-MA )。对 OpenPose-MA 和 Human-MA 之间的 MAE 和 CMC 进行了非配对 t 检验。在 DVJ 试验中,OpenPose-MA、Human-MA 和 3D-MA 的 ICCs (1,3) 均显示出极佳的重现性。在膝关节外翻角度的 MAEs(OpenPose:2.4° [95%CI:1.9-3.0°],Human:3.2° [95%CI:2.1-4.4°])或 CMCs(OpenPose:0.83 [范围:0.99-0.53],Human:0.87 [范围:0.24-0.98])方面,OpenPose-MA 和 Human-MA 之间没有观察到明显差异。与 3D-MA 相比,OpenPose-MA 和人体-MA 的皮尔逊相关系数分别为 0.97 和 0.98。这项研究表明,OpenPose-MA 的再现性和准确性令人满意,其波形相似性与 3D-MA 相当,与人体-MA 相似。在膝外翻角偏移方面,OpenPose-MA 和人体-MA 与 3D-MA 都显示出很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信