Implementation of a rural emergency department-initiated buprenorphine program in the mountain west: a study protocol.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Natasha Seliski, Troy Madsen, Savannah Eley, Jennifer Colosimo, Travis Engar, Adam Gordon, Christinna Barnett, Grace Humiston, Taylor Morsillo, Laura Stolebarger, Marcela C Smid, Gerald Cochran
{"title":"Implementation of a rural emergency department-initiated buprenorphine program in the mountain west: a study protocol.","authors":"Natasha Seliski, Troy Madsen, Savannah Eley, Jennifer Colosimo, Travis Engar, Adam Gordon, Christinna Barnett, Grace Humiston, Taylor Morsillo, Laura Stolebarger, Marcela C Smid, Gerald Cochran","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00496-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid related overdose morbidity and mortality continue to significantly impact rural communities. Nationwide, emergency departments (EDs) have seen an increase in opioid use disorder (OUD)-related visits compared to other substance use disorders (SUD). ED-initiated buprenorphine is associated with increased treatment engagement at 30 days. However, few studies assess rural ED-initiated buprenorphine implementation, which has unique implementation barriers. This protocol outlines the rationale and methods of a rural ED-initiated buprenorphine program implementation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a two-year longitudinal implementation design with repeated qualitative and quantitative measures of an ED-initiated buprenorphine program in the rural Mountain West. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework outlines intervention assessments. The primary outcome is implementation measured by ED-initiated buprenorphine protocol core components. Reach, adoption, and maintenance are secondary outcomes. External facilitators from an academic institution with addiction medicine and prior program implementation expertise partnered with community hospital internal facilitators to form an implementation team. External facilitators provide ongoing support, recommendations, education, and academic detailing. The implementation team designed and implemented the rural ED-initiated buprenorphine program. The program includes OUD screening, low-threshold buprenorphine initiation, naloxone distribution and administration training, and patient navigator incorporation to provide warm hand off referrals for outpatient OUD management. To address rural based implementation barriers, we organized implementation strategies based on Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC). Implementation strategies include ED workflow redesign, local needs assessments, ED staff education, hospital leadership and clinical champion involvement, as well as patient and community resources engagement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most ED-initiated buprenorphine implementation studies have been conducted in urban settings, with few involving rural areas and none have been done in the rural Mountain West. Rural EDs face unique barriers, but tailored implementation strategies with external facilitation support may help address these. This protocol could help identify effective rural ED-initiated buprenorphine implementation strategies to integrate more accessible OUD treatment within rural communities to prevent further morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov National Clinical Trials, NCT06087991. Registered 11 October 2023 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06087991 .</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00496-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid related overdose morbidity and mortality continue to significantly impact rural communities. Nationwide, emergency departments (EDs) have seen an increase in opioid use disorder (OUD)-related visits compared to other substance use disorders (SUD). ED-initiated buprenorphine is associated with increased treatment engagement at 30 days. However, few studies assess rural ED-initiated buprenorphine implementation, which has unique implementation barriers. This protocol outlines the rationale and methods of a rural ED-initiated buprenorphine program implementation study.

Methods: This is a two-year longitudinal implementation design with repeated qualitative and quantitative measures of an ED-initiated buprenorphine program in the rural Mountain West. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework outlines intervention assessments. The primary outcome is implementation measured by ED-initiated buprenorphine protocol core components. Reach, adoption, and maintenance are secondary outcomes. External facilitators from an academic institution with addiction medicine and prior program implementation expertise partnered with community hospital internal facilitators to form an implementation team. External facilitators provide ongoing support, recommendations, education, and academic detailing. The implementation team designed and implemented the rural ED-initiated buprenorphine program. The program includes OUD screening, low-threshold buprenorphine initiation, naloxone distribution and administration training, and patient navigator incorporation to provide warm hand off referrals for outpatient OUD management. To address rural based implementation barriers, we organized implementation strategies based on Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC). Implementation strategies include ED workflow redesign, local needs assessments, ED staff education, hospital leadership and clinical champion involvement, as well as patient and community resources engagement.

Discussion: Most ED-initiated buprenorphine implementation studies have been conducted in urban settings, with few involving rural areas and none have been done in the rural Mountain West. Rural EDs face unique barriers, but tailored implementation strategies with external facilitation support may help address these. This protocol could help identify effective rural ED-initiated buprenorphine implementation strategies to integrate more accessible OUD treatment within rural communities to prevent further morbidity and mortality.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov National Clinical Trials, NCT06087991. Registered 11 October 2023 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06087991 .

在西部山区实施由农村急诊科发起的丁丙诺啡计划:研究方案。
背景:与阿片类药物过量相关的发病率和死亡率继续严重影响着农村社区。在全国范围内,与其他药物使用障碍(SUD)相比,与阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)相关的急诊就诊人数有所增加。急诊室启动丁丙诺啡治疗与 30 天治疗参与度的提高有关。然而,很少有研究对由急诊室发起的丁丙诺啡在农村地区的实施情况进行评估,因为农村地区在实施过程中存在独特的障碍。本方案概述了一项由农村急诊室发起的丁丙诺啡项目实施研究的原理和方法:这是一项为期两年的纵向实施设计,对西部山区农村地区由急诊室发起的丁丙诺啡项目进行重复的定性和定量测量。RE-AIM(Reach、Effectiveness、Adoption、Implementation 和 Maintenance)框架概述了干预评估。主要结果是通过 ED 启动的丁丙诺啡方案核心内容来衡量实施情况。到达率、采用率和维持率是次要结果。来自学术机构的外部促进者拥有成瘾医学和先前项目实施的专业知识,他们与社区医院的内部促进者合作组成了一个实施团队。外部促进者提供持续的支持、建议、教育和学术指导。实施团队设计并实施了由农村急诊室发起的丁丙诺啡项目。该计划包括 OUD 筛查、低阈值丁丙诺啡启动、纳洛酮分发和管理培训,以及纳入患者导航员,为门诊 OUD 管理提供热情的移交转介。为了解决农村地区的实施障碍,我们根据《专家建议实施变革》(ERIC)整理了实施策略。实施策略包括重新设计急诊室工作流程、当地需求评估、急诊室员工教育、医院领导和临床支持者参与以及患者和社区资源参与:大多数由急诊室发起的丁丙诺啡实施研究都是在城市环境中进行的,涉及农村地区的研究很少,在西部山区的农村地区也没有进行过研究。农村急诊室面临着独特的障碍,但在外部促进支持下,量身定制的实施策略可能有助于解决这些问题。该方案有助于确定有效的由农村急诊室发起的丁丙诺啡实施策略,从而在农村社区整合更方便的 OUD 治疗,防止进一步的发病率和死亡率:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 国家临床试验,NCT06087991。注册日期:2023 年 10 月 11 日 - 追溯注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06087991 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信