Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs.

IF 1 2区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jaeeon Cheon, Jinsu Kang, Namsoo Kim, Suyoung Heo
{"title":"Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs.","authors":"Jaeeon Cheon, Jinsu Kang, Namsoo Kim, Suyoung Heo","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> To introduce a novel universal guide design for distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) to treat femoral deformities and other hindlimb orthopaedic diseases, and to compare its accuracy to the patient-specific guide in vitro and ex vivo on X-ray and computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Thirteen anatomic specimens of canine femurs and 13 3D-printed femoral bone models were subjected to DFO using a patient-specific and a universal guide. The anatomical lateral distal femoral angle and anteversion angle were measured on radiographic and CT images before and after surgical procedure and used to compare the accuracy of the surgical guides in treating uniplanar or biplanar deformities. Bone models were used to compare the accuracy with ex vivo models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The mean correction errors were -1.18° to 0.72° on X-ray and -1.91° to 0.53° on CT scan. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the mean error between the groups based on type of guide used, nor in the mean error between groups based on whether anteversion correction was performed based on both the CT and X-ray imaging data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Both the patient-specific and universal guides can produce accurate results in DFO surgery, and the universal guide shows potential as a useful surgical tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  To introduce a novel universal guide design for distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) to treat femoral deformities and other hindlimb orthopaedic diseases, and to compare its accuracy to the patient-specific guide in vitro and ex vivo on X-ray and computed tomography (CT).

Methods:  Thirteen anatomic specimens of canine femurs and 13 3D-printed femoral bone models were subjected to DFO using a patient-specific and a universal guide. The anatomical lateral distal femoral angle and anteversion angle were measured on radiographic and CT images before and after surgical procedure and used to compare the accuracy of the surgical guides in treating uniplanar or biplanar deformities. Bone models were used to compare the accuracy with ex vivo models.

Results:  The mean correction errors were -1.18° to 0.72° on X-ray and -1.91° to 0.53° on CT scan. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the mean error between the groups based on type of guide used, nor in the mean error between groups based on whether anteversion correction was performed based on both the CT and X-ray imaging data.

Conclusion:  Both the patient-specific and universal guides can produce accurate results in DFO surgery, and the universal guide shows potential as a useful surgical tool.

比较狗股骨远端截骨术患者专用指南和通用指南的准确性
目的介绍一种用于股骨远端截骨术(DFO)的新型通用导板设计,以治疗股骨畸形和其他后肢矫形疾病,并通过X射线和计算机断层扫描(CT)比较其在体外和体内与患者专用导板的准确性:方法:使用患者特异性指南和通用指南对 13 个犬股骨解剖标本和 13 个 3D 打印股骨头模型进行 DFO 分析。在手术前后,通过X光片和CT图像测量解剖股骨远端外侧角和内翻角,比较手术导板治疗单平面或双平面畸形的准确性。使用骨骼模型与体内外模型比较精确度:X 射线的平均校正误差为-1.18°至 0.72°,CT 扫描的平均校正误差为-1.91°至 0.53°。分析表明,根据所使用的导板类型,各组之间的平均误差无统计学差异;根据CT和X光成像数据,根据是否进行内翻矫正,各组之间的平均误差也无统计学差异:结论:患者专用导板和通用导板都能在 DFO 手术中产生准确的结果,通用导板显示出作为一种有用的手术工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信