Writing direction influences the spatial representations of past- and future-tense forms: Evidence from eye tracking.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Anna Chrabaszcz, Anna Laurinavichyute, Nina Ladinskaya, Liubov Baladzhaeva, Anat Prior, Andriy Myachykov, Olga Dragoy
{"title":"Writing direction influences the spatial representations of past- and future-tense forms: Evidence from eye tracking.","authors":"Anna Chrabaszcz, Anna Laurinavichyute, Nina Ladinskaya, Liubov Baladzhaeva, Anat Prior, Andriy Myachykov, Olga Dragoy","doi":"10.3758/s13421-024-01633-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study tests the hypothesis that the directionality of reading habits (left-to-right or right-to-left) impacts individuals' representation of nonspatial events. Using the blank screen paradigm, we examine whether eye movements reflect culture-specific spatial biases in processing temporal information, specifically, grammatical tense in Russian and Hebrew. Sixty-two native speakers of Russian (a language with a left-to-right reading and writing system) and 62 native speakers of Hebrew (a language with a right-to-left reading and writing system) listened to verbs in the past or future tense while their spontaneous gaze positions were recorded. Following the verb, a visual spatial probe appeared in one of the five locations of the screen, and participants responded manually to indicate its position. While participants' response latencies to the spatial probe revealed no significant effects, their gaze positions along the horizontal axis for past- and future-tensed verbs aligned with the reading and writing direction in their language. These results provide novel evidence that eye movements during auditory processing of grammatical tense are influenced by culturally specific reading and writing conventions, shifting leftward or rightward on the horizontal plane depending on the stimuli's time reference (past or future) and the participants' language (Russian or Hebrew). This spatial bias indicates a common underlying cognitive mechanism that uses spatial dimensions to represent temporal constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01633-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study tests the hypothesis that the directionality of reading habits (left-to-right or right-to-left) impacts individuals' representation of nonspatial events. Using the blank screen paradigm, we examine whether eye movements reflect culture-specific spatial biases in processing temporal information, specifically, grammatical tense in Russian and Hebrew. Sixty-two native speakers of Russian (a language with a left-to-right reading and writing system) and 62 native speakers of Hebrew (a language with a right-to-left reading and writing system) listened to verbs in the past or future tense while their spontaneous gaze positions were recorded. Following the verb, a visual spatial probe appeared in one of the five locations of the screen, and participants responded manually to indicate its position. While participants' response latencies to the spatial probe revealed no significant effects, their gaze positions along the horizontal axis for past- and future-tensed verbs aligned with the reading and writing direction in their language. These results provide novel evidence that eye movements during auditory processing of grammatical tense are influenced by culturally specific reading and writing conventions, shifting leftward or rightward on the horizontal plane depending on the stimuli's time reference (past or future) and the participants' language (Russian or Hebrew). This spatial bias indicates a common underlying cognitive mechanism that uses spatial dimensions to represent temporal constructs.

Abstract Image

书写方向影响过去式和将来式的空间表征:来自眼动跟踪的证据。
本研究检验了阅读习惯的方向性(从左到右或从右到左)会影响个体对非空间事件的表征这一假设。我们使用空白屏幕范式,研究眼球运动是否反映了特定文化在处理时间信息时的空间偏差,特别是俄语和希伯来语的语法时态。62 名母语为俄语(一种从左到右读写系统的语言)和 62 名母语为希伯来语(一种从右到左读写系统的语言)的人在聆听过去或将来时态的动词时,他们的自发注视位置被记录了下来。听完动词后,一个视觉空间探针会出现在屏幕的五个位置之一,参与者手动做出反应以指示探针的位置。虽然参与者对空间探针的反应潜伏期没有显示出明显的影响,但他们对过去式和将来式动词沿水平轴的注视位置与他们语言中的读写方向一致。这些结果提供了新的证据,即在语法时态的听觉处理过程中,眼球运动会受到特定文化读写习惯的影响,根据刺激的时间参照(过去或将来)和参与者的语言(俄语或希伯来语)在水平面上向左或向右移动。这种空间偏差表明了一种共同的潜在认知机制,即使用空间维度来表示时间建构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信