Current status of laparoscopy teaching in gynecology and obstetrics medical residency in Brazil.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0458
Carla Ferreira Kikuchi Fernandes, José Maria Cordeiro Ruano, Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori, Renato Monteiro Zucchi, Marcelo Fiore Moutinho Capo
{"title":"Current status of laparoscopy teaching in gynecology and obstetrics medical residency in Brazil.","authors":"Carla Ferreira Kikuchi Fernandes, José Maria Cordeiro Ruano, Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori, Renato Monteiro Zucchi, Marcelo Fiore Moutinho Capo","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize laparoscopy teaching in Medical Residency Programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics in Brazil, and to evaluate preceptors' characteristics in laparoscopy programs and map laparoscopic training practice scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study evaluated questionnaire responses from coordinators of the Medical Residency Programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics from 2019 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was sent to 175 programs, and 90 responses were received (51.4%). From the 85 valid responses, it was noted that 67 programs had laparoscopic training. Of the 64 responses received regarding location, 32 replies (50%) indicated the Southeast of Brazil, particularly some country's capitals. In 37.3% (n=25) of the cases, the program coordinator performed laparoscopy. The chief of the laparoscopy sector has advanced experience in most 52.5% (n=10) medical residency services; the preceptors also had advanced experience in 89.4% (n=59) of the services. Residents received laboratory training in 39.4% (n=26) of the services. In most cases, training was performed using a physical simulator. Of the 26 medical residency services with laparoscopy training outside the operating room, 80.8% (n=21) performed them as part of the curriculum, 61.5% (n=16) had a schedule for the same, and only 3.9% (n=1) were objectively evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopy teaching in Brazil is heterogeneous, with only a few programs offering any training in laparoscopy. The preceptors had advanced experience and participated in laboratory and operating room training. Only a few programs have their own laboratories or training centers, and most teaching programs do not plan to set up training centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize laparoscopy teaching in Medical Residency Programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics in Brazil, and to evaluate preceptors' characteristics in laparoscopy programs and map laparoscopic training practice scenarios.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study evaluated questionnaire responses from coordinators of the Medical Residency Programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics from 2019 to 2021.

Results: The questionnaire was sent to 175 programs, and 90 responses were received (51.4%). From the 85 valid responses, it was noted that 67 programs had laparoscopic training. Of the 64 responses received regarding location, 32 replies (50%) indicated the Southeast of Brazil, particularly some country's capitals. In 37.3% (n=25) of the cases, the program coordinator performed laparoscopy. The chief of the laparoscopy sector has advanced experience in most 52.5% (n=10) medical residency services; the preceptors also had advanced experience in 89.4% (n=59) of the services. Residents received laboratory training in 39.4% (n=26) of the services. In most cases, training was performed using a physical simulator. Of the 26 medical residency services with laparoscopy training outside the operating room, 80.8% (n=21) performed them as part of the curriculum, 61.5% (n=16) had a schedule for the same, and only 3.9% (n=1) were objectively evaluated.

Conclusion: Laparoscopy teaching in Brazil is heterogeneous, with only a few programs offering any training in laparoscopy. The preceptors had advanced experience and participated in laboratory and operating room training. Only a few programs have their own laboratories or training centers, and most teaching programs do not plan to set up training centers.

巴西妇产科住院医生腹腔镜教学现状。
目的描述巴西妇产科医学住院医师培训项目中腹腔镜教学的特点,评估腹腔镜项目中训导员的特点,绘制腹腔镜培训实践场景图:这项描述性横断面研究评估了2019年至2021年妇产科住院医师培训项目协调员的问卷答复:调查问卷共发给 175 个项目,收到 90 份回复(51.4%)。从 85 份有效回复中可以看出,有 67 个项目开展了腹腔镜培训。在收到的64份有关地点的回复中,32份(50%)表示在巴西东南部,特别是一些国家的首都。在37.3%(n=25)的病例中,项目协调员进行了腹腔镜手术。在52.5%(10人)的住院医师医疗服务中,腹腔镜部门的负责人都具有高级经验;在89.4%(59人)的服务中,实习医生也具有高级经验。39.4%(n=26)的住院医师接受了实验室培训。在大多数情况下,培训是通过物理模拟器进行的。在26个在手术室外进行腹腔镜培训的住院医师医疗服务机构中,80.8%(n=21)将腹腔镜培训作为课程的一部分,61.5%(n=16)有腹腔镜培训计划,只有3.9%(n=1)进行了客观评估:结论:巴西的腹腔镜教学参差不齐,只有少数课程提供腹腔镜培训。戒律者拥有先进的经验,并参与了实验室和手术室培训。只有少数项目拥有自己的实验室或培训中心,而大多数教学项目并不打算建立培训中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信