The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on the Prognosis of Primary Bone Tumors: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
JBJS Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00071
Alireza Ebrahimi, Sahar Hosseini, Saeed Shahabi, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Santiago Lozano-Calderon
{"title":"The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on the Prognosis of Primary Bone Tumors: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Alireza Ebrahimi, Sahar Hosseini, Saeed Shahabi, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Santiago Lozano-Calderon","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the prevalence of primary bone tumors (PBTs) was reported to be relatively low, they represent a difficult category of tumors for appropriate prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Among different factors contributing to the prognosis and treatment outcomes of patients with these tumors, it is assumed that social determinants of health (SDOH) have not been well investigated nor applied in the process of decision making for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and CINAHL were used. To ensure the quality of the studies and assess them for bias, we used the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies scaling tool. The relevant data were extracted from the included studies and reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies were included in our review based on the inclusion criteria. Age, socioeconomic status, education, and employment status; place of living and neighborhood; race and ethnicity; and insurance coverage were found to impact the outcomes and prognosis of PBTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Literature has shown correlations of various SDOH with the outcomes of PBTs. SDOH are not independent of each other; including and interpreting them in the process of decision making should be in a multifactorial and intercalated manner. We suggest prospective studies on finding the effect of inventing with SDOH through changes in health care policies, educating patients and care providers, improving socioeconomic conditions, and providing better insurance support, on the outcomes of PBTs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the prevalence of primary bone tumors (PBTs) was reported to be relatively low, they represent a difficult category of tumors for appropriate prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Among different factors contributing to the prognosis and treatment outcomes of patients with these tumors, it is assumed that social determinants of health (SDOH) have not been well investigated nor applied in the process of decision making for these patients.

Methods: In this systematic review, databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and CINAHL were used. To ensure the quality of the studies and assess them for bias, we used the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies scaling tool. The relevant data were extracted from the included studies and reported.

Results: Twenty-five studies were included in our review based on the inclusion criteria. Age, socioeconomic status, education, and employment status; place of living and neighborhood; race and ethnicity; and insurance coverage were found to impact the outcomes and prognosis of PBTs.

Conclusion: Literature has shown correlations of various SDOH with the outcomes of PBTs. SDOH are not independent of each other; including and interpreting them in the process of decision making should be in a multifactorial and intercalated manner. We suggest prospective studies on finding the effect of inventing with SDOH through changes in health care policies, educating patients and care providers, improving socioeconomic conditions, and providing better insurance support, on the outcomes of PBTs.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

健康的社会决定因素对原发性骨肿瘤预后的影响:系统回顾
背景:尽管原发性骨肿瘤(PBTs)的发病率相对较低,但它们是一类难以进行适当预测、预防、诊断和治疗的肿瘤。在影响这些肿瘤患者预后和治疗效果的不同因素中,人们认为健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)尚未得到很好的研究,也未应用于这些患者的决策过程中:本系统综述使用的数据库包括 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、Science Direct 和 CINAHL。为确保研究的质量并评估其偏倚性,我们使用了非随机研究方法学指数缩放工具。我们从纳入的研究中提取了相关数据并进行了报告:根据纳入标准,我们共纳入了 25 项研究。研究发现,年龄、社会经济地位、教育程度和就业状况、居住地和邻里关系、种族和民族以及保险覆盖率对 PBTs 的结果和预后有影响:结论:文献显示,各种 SDOH 与 PBTs 的结果存在相关性。SDOH 并非相互独立,在决策过程中应以多因素和交叉的方式纳入并解释这些因素。我们建议开展前瞻性研究,通过改变医疗保健政策、教育患者和医疗服务提供者、改善社会经济条件、提供更好的保险支持等方式,找出与 SDOH 相关的因素对 PBTs 结果的影响:证据等级:III 级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Reviews
JBJS Reviews SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: JBJS Reviews is an innovative review journal from the publishers of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. This continuously published online journal provides comprehensive, objective, and authoritative review articles written by recognized experts in the field. Edited by Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, and a distinguished Editorial Board, each issue of JBJS Reviews, updates the orthopaedic community on important topics in a concise, time-saving manner, providing expert insights into orthopaedic research and clinical experience. Comprehensive reviews, special features, and integrated CME provide orthopaedic surgeons with valuable perspectives on surgical practice and the latest advances in the field within twelve subspecialty areas: Basic Science, Education & Training, Elbow, Ethics, Foot & Ankle, Hand & Wrist, Hip, Infection, Knee, Oncology, Pediatrics, Pain Management, Rehabilitation, Shoulder, Spine, Sports Medicine, Trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信