The effects of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing In vitro fertilization or Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Faezeh Zakerinasab, Qumars Behfar, Reza Parsaee, Fariba Arbab Mojeni, Arina Ansari, Niloofar Deravi, Reza Khademi
{"title":"The effects of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing In vitro fertilization or Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Faezeh Zakerinasab, Qumars Behfar, Reza Parsaee, Fariba Arbab Mojeni, Arina Ansari, Niloofar Deravi, Reza Khademi","doi":"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.59944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effect of growth hormone (GH) supplementation on outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for women with poor ovarian response. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained through search in several databases including PubMed, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measures included live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, cycle cancelation rate, number of retrieved oocytes, number of transferred embryos, total dose of gonadotropin, duration of gonadotropin treatment, and peak estradiol level. Additionally, a meta-regression analysis was carried out to determine any potential linear relationships between these outcomes and IVF success. After analyzing 18 RCTs comprising of 1870 patients, the study found that GH supplementation improved the number of retrieved oocytes [standardized mean difference (SMD), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-1.00] and transferred embryos group (SMD, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.39, 1.21) as well as peak E2 level (SMD, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.81). While reduced the total dose and duration of gonadotropin treatment (SMD, -0.82, 95% CI, -1.25, -0.39, and SMD, -0.63, 95% CI, -1.04, -0.22, respectively). The meta-regression analysis found no linear relationship between clinical pregnancy, live birth rate, or cycle cancelation rate and the outcomes measured (p>0.1). Based on the available evidence, GH supplementation appears to improve the outcomes of IVF or ICSI in women with poor response. However, there is a need for further RCTs with larger sample sizes to determine the cost-effectiveness of adding GH to conventional protocols of IVF/ICSI for treating infertility in women with poor ovarian response.</p>","PeriodicalId":45340,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"21 3","pages":"208-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.59944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of growth hormone (GH) supplementation on outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for women with poor ovarian response. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained through search in several databases including PubMed, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measures included live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, cycle cancelation rate, number of retrieved oocytes, number of transferred embryos, total dose of gonadotropin, duration of gonadotropin treatment, and peak estradiol level. Additionally, a meta-regression analysis was carried out to determine any potential linear relationships between these outcomes and IVF success. After analyzing 18 RCTs comprising of 1870 patients, the study found that GH supplementation improved the number of retrieved oocytes [standardized mean difference (SMD), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-1.00] and transferred embryos group (SMD, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.39, 1.21) as well as peak E2 level (SMD, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.81). While reduced the total dose and duration of gonadotropin treatment (SMD, -0.82, 95% CI, -1.25, -0.39, and SMD, -0.63, 95% CI, -1.04, -0.22, respectively). The meta-regression analysis found no linear relationship between clinical pregnancy, live birth rate, or cycle cancelation rate and the outcomes measured (p>0.1). Based on the available evidence, GH supplementation appears to improve the outcomes of IVF or ICSI in women with poor response. However, there is a need for further RCTs with larger sample sizes to determine the cost-effectiveness of adding GH to conventional protocols of IVF/ICSI for treating infertility in women with poor ovarian response.

体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射对卵巢反应差者补充生长激素的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评估补充生长激素(GH)对卵巢反应不佳女性体外受精(IVF)或卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)结果的影响。相关的随机对照试验(RCT)是通过在多个数据库(包括PubMed、Scopus、Clinicaltrials.gov、Google Scholar和Cochrane Library)中搜索获得的。结果测量指标包括活产率、临床妊娠率、周期取消率、取卵细胞数、移植胚胎数、促性腺激素总剂量、促性腺激素治疗持续时间和雌二醇峰值水平。此外,还进行了元回归分析,以确定这些结果与试管婴儿成功率之间是否存在潜在的线性关系。在对1870名患者的18项研究进行分析后,研究发现补充促性腺激素能提高取卵数[标准化平均差(SMD),0.65;95%置信区间(CI),0.29-1.00]和移植胚胎组(SMD,0.80,95% CI,0.39,1.21)以及E2峰值水平(SMD,1.20;95% CI,0.59,1.81)。同时减少了促性腺激素治疗的总剂量和持续时间(SMD,-0.82,95% CI,-1.25,-0.39;SMD,-0.63,95% CI,-1.04,-0.22)。元回归分析发现,临床妊娠、活产率或周期取消率与测量结果之间没有线性关系(P>0.1)。根据现有证据,补充 GH 似乎可以改善反应不佳妇女的体外受精(IVF)或卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)结果。不过,还需要进一步开展样本量更大的研究性试验,以确定在常规体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射方案中添加 GH 治疗卵巢反应不良妇女不孕症的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信