Lymph node evaluation and nodal metastasis prediction in epithelial ovarian cancers: A retrospective study.

Abstract

Objective: To identify consensus regarding lymph node (LN) evaluation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The objective of the present study was to evaluate surgico-pathological findings, LN involvement, and the prediction of LN metastasis via preoperative imaging and intraoperative assessment in women with EOC.

Materials and methods: Women with EOC who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) between Jan 2019 to June 2022 were included. The distribution of histology, stage, and LN metastasis was studied. The predictive value of serum cancer antigen (CA)-125, instead of and radiologically and surgically enlarged LNs with final LN histopathology was studied.

Results: A total of 96 women with EOCs underwent CRS. Fifty women (52%) underwent primary CRS and 46 women (48%) underwent interval CRS. Seventy-five women (78.13%) with EOC underwent pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy, out of which 23 (30.67%) were histologically positive. High-grade serous carcinoma was the commonest (n=55, 73.33%) histology. The majority of women, 56 (74.67%) were stage III or IV at presentation. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 59 (78.66%) patients. The receiver operating characteristics curve showed a cutoff for CA-125 of 1360 U/mL (area under the curve 0.702, p=0.002) for LN metastases. Both radiologically and surgically enlarged LNs significantly predicted LN metastasis on histopathology (p=0.02 and 0.006 respectively). The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of both contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and surgically enlarged LNs were 78.26%, 57.69%, 45%, and 85.71%, respectively.

Conclusion: Serous histology, high-grade tumors, highCA-125 levels, and suspicious LNs on CECT or during surgery were significantly associated with LN metastasis. However, considering the false-negative rate of 21.74%, the combination of radiologically and surgically enlarged LNs cannot be used as the sole surrogate marker for lymphadenectomy.