Sub-optimal therapy of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in the real-life stetting of the German PBC cohort.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Johannes Wiegand, Annegret Franke, Tobias Müller, Kerstin Stein, Heike Bantel, Rainer Günther, Gerald Denk, Philipp A Reuken, Jörn M Schattenberg, Uwe Naumann, Tobias Böttler, Andreas Weber, Stefan Zeuzem, Matthias Hinz, Robin Greinert, Christoph Berg, Thaddäus Till Wissniowski, Karl-Georg Simon, Jonel Trebicka, Rüdiger Behrens, Harald Grümmer, Wolf Peter Hofmann, Nektarios Dikopoulos, Christoph Sarrazin, Elke Roeb, Andreas E Kremer, Marion Muche, Marc Ringelhan, Andreas Teufel, Patrick Michl, Verena Keitel, Jens U Marquardt, Achim Kautz, Frank Tacke, Katja Piotrowski, Nicole Köppe-Bauernfeind, Christian Trautwein, Thomas Berg
{"title":"Sub-optimal therapy of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in the real-life stetting of the German PBC cohort.","authors":"Johannes Wiegand, Annegret Franke, Tobias Müller, Kerstin Stein, Heike Bantel, Rainer Günther, Gerald Denk, Philipp A Reuken, Jörn M Schattenberg, Uwe Naumann, Tobias Böttler, Andreas Weber, Stefan Zeuzem, Matthias Hinz, Robin Greinert, Christoph Berg, Thaddäus Till Wissniowski, Karl-Georg Simon, Jonel Trebicka, Rüdiger Behrens, Harald Grümmer, Wolf Peter Hofmann, Nektarios Dikopoulos, Christoph Sarrazin, Elke Roeb, Andreas E Kremer, Marion Muche, Marc Ringelhan, Andreas Teufel, Patrick Michl, Verena Keitel, Jens U Marquardt, Achim Kautz, Frank Tacke, Katja Piotrowski, Nicole Köppe-Bauernfeind, Christian Trautwein, Thomas Berg","doi":"10.1055/a-2382-7720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Real-world data on the management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are so far scarce in Germany. Therefore, we aimed to establish a nationwide registry and describe the clinical characteristics and therapy of PBC patients.Three different cohorts defined as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) responders, as inadequate responders according to Paris II criteria, and as newly diagnosed patients were prospectively recruited.This manuscript includes the baseline data of the project.In total, 33/77 (43%) contacted centres (58% of university hospitals, 38% of non-university hospitals, and 24% of private practices) recruited 515 patients including 204 UDCA responders, 221 inadequate responders to UDCA, and 90 newly diagnosed patients.All patients were treated with UDCA; however, a UDCA dosage below the recommended dosage of 13 mg/kg/d was observed in 38.5% of individuals after 12 months of treatment. UDCA dosages were lower in nonacademic compared to academic centres.Only 75/219 (38.5%) of inadequate responders to UDCA received a second-line therapy with obeticholic acid (OCA) and/or bezafibrate (BZF). OCA (13% vs. 4.5%) and BZF (14% vs. 6.5%) were significantly more often prescribed by academic vs. nonacademic centres.Pruritus (27% vs. 15.5%), fatigue (23% vs. 4.5%), and sicca syndrome (14% vs. 1%) were significantly more often reported by academic centres.The German PBC registry could be established, which indicates suboptimal therapy in a relevant proportion of patients and shows significant differences between academic and nonacademic centres. Results are fundamental to improving clinical management at different levels of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23853,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2382-7720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-world data on the management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are so far scarce in Germany. Therefore, we aimed to establish a nationwide registry and describe the clinical characteristics and therapy of PBC patients.Three different cohorts defined as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) responders, as inadequate responders according to Paris II criteria, and as newly diagnosed patients were prospectively recruited.This manuscript includes the baseline data of the project.In total, 33/77 (43%) contacted centres (58% of university hospitals, 38% of non-university hospitals, and 24% of private practices) recruited 515 patients including 204 UDCA responders, 221 inadequate responders to UDCA, and 90 newly diagnosed patients.All patients were treated with UDCA; however, a UDCA dosage below the recommended dosage of 13 mg/kg/d was observed in 38.5% of individuals after 12 months of treatment. UDCA dosages were lower in nonacademic compared to academic centres.Only 75/219 (38.5%) of inadequate responders to UDCA received a second-line therapy with obeticholic acid (OCA) and/or bezafibrate (BZF). OCA (13% vs. 4.5%) and BZF (14% vs. 6.5%) were significantly more often prescribed by academic vs. nonacademic centres.Pruritus (27% vs. 15.5%), fatigue (23% vs. 4.5%), and sicca syndrome (14% vs. 1%) were significantly more often reported by academic centres.The German PBC registry could be established, which indicates suboptimal therapy in a relevant proportion of patients and shows significant differences between academic and nonacademic centres. Results are fundamental to improving clinical management at different levels of care.

德国原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)队列中原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)患者的次优治疗。
迄今为止,德国有关原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)患者治疗的真实数据还很少。因此,我们旨在建立一个全国范围的登记处,并描述 PBC 患者的临床特征和治疗方法。我们前瞻性地招募了熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)应答者、根据巴黎 II 标准应答不足者和新诊断患者三个不同的组群。33/77(43%)家联系中心(58%为大学医院,38%为非大学医院,24%为私人诊所)共招募了 515 名患者,其中包括 204 名 UDCA 反应者、221 名 UDCA 反应不足者和 90 名新诊断患者。与学术中心相比,非学术中心的 UDCA 剂量更低。在对 UDCA 反应不足的患者中,只有 75/219 人(38.5%)接受了奥贝胆酸 (OCA) 和/或贝扎贝特 (BZF) 的二线治疗。OCA(13% vs. 4.5%)和 BZF(14% vs. 6.5%)在学术中心的处方率明显高于非学术中心。瘙痒(27% vs. 15.5%)、疲劳(23% vs. 4.5%)和眼综合征(14% vs. 1%)在学术中心的报告率明显高于非学术中心。这些结果对于改善不同级别医疗机构的临床管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
562
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie ist seit über 50 Jahren die führende deutsche Fachzeitschrift auf dem Gebiet der Gastroenterologie. Sie richtet sich an Gastroenterologen und alle anderen gastroenterologisch interessierten Ärzte. Als offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten sowie der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie informiert sie zuverlässig und aktuell über die wichtigen Neuerungen und Entwicklungen in der Gastroenterologie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信