Real-world experience in treatment of donor-derived Hepatitis C virus in kidney transplant recipients with delayed initiation, shortened course glecaprevir/pibrentasvir versus standard of care.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Johanna Papanikolla, Melissa McGowan, Mythili Chunduru, Holli Winters, Todd Pesavento, Rachel Smith, Navdeep Singh, Michael Wellner, Lindsay Sobotka, Annelise Nolan
{"title":"Real-world experience in treatment of donor-derived Hepatitis C virus in kidney transplant recipients with delayed initiation, shortened course glecaprevir/pibrentasvir versus standard of care.","authors":"Johanna Papanikolla, Melissa McGowan, Mythili Chunduru, Holli Winters, Todd Pesavento, Rachel Smith, Navdeep Singh, Michael Wellner, Lindsay Sobotka, Annelise Nolan","doi":"10.1111/tid.14366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited literature describing the real-world practice of delayed initiation and shortened duration direct-acting antiviral (DAA) in kidney transplant recipients. We compared Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure rates among kidney transplant recipients who received an HCV nucleic acid test positive (NAT +) kidney and were treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for 12 weeks or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for 8 weeks, a duration that is 4 weeks shorter than the guideline recommendation for treatment delay beyond 1-week post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of HCV-negative adult patients who received a kidney transplant from an HCV NAT+ donor between April 2019 and April 2022 treated with either SOF/VEL for 12 weeks or G/P for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after completion of therapy (SVR12). Secondary outcomes included time to DAA initiation, renal function, graft loss, patient death, liver function tests, and opportunistic infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 kidney transplant recipients were included with 36 treated with G/P and 66 treated with SOF/VEL. All 36 (100%) treated with G/P achieved SVR12. One patient in the SOF/VEL group failed to achieve SVR12 but received additional therapy and was cured. Time to DAA initiation was similar with a mean of 4 weeks. There was no difference in AST/ALT > 3x ULN or renal function. One rejection occurred in each group. No patient death or graft loss was observed. There was no difference in cytomegalovirus and BK viremia between groups.  CONCLUSION: Delayed initiation of DAA therapy with 12 weeks of SOF/VEL or 8 weeks of G/P achieves SVR12 in kidney transplant recipients without significant adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited literature describing the real-world practice of delayed initiation and shortened duration direct-acting antiviral (DAA) in kidney transplant recipients. We compared Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure rates among kidney transplant recipients who received an HCV nucleic acid test positive (NAT +) kidney and were treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for 12 weeks or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for 8 weeks, a duration that is 4 weeks shorter than the guideline recommendation for treatment delay beyond 1-week post-transplant.

Methods: Retrospective study of HCV-negative adult patients who received a kidney transplant from an HCV NAT+ donor between April 2019 and April 2022 treated with either SOF/VEL for 12 weeks or G/P for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after completion of therapy (SVR12). Secondary outcomes included time to DAA initiation, renal function, graft loss, patient death, liver function tests, and opportunistic infections.

Results: 102 kidney transplant recipients were included with 36 treated with G/P and 66 treated with SOF/VEL. All 36 (100%) treated with G/P achieved SVR12. One patient in the SOF/VEL group failed to achieve SVR12 but received additional therapy and was cured. Time to DAA initiation was similar with a mean of 4 weeks. There was no difference in AST/ALT > 3x ULN or renal function. One rejection occurred in each group. No patient death or graft loss was observed. There was no difference in cytomegalovirus and BK viremia between groups.  CONCLUSION: Delayed initiation of DAA therapy with 12 weeks of SOF/VEL or 8 weeks of G/P achieves SVR12 in kidney transplant recipients without significant adverse effects.

肾移植受者使用延迟启动、缩短疗程的 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 与标准疗法治疗供体源性丙型肝炎病毒的实际经验。
背景:描述肾移植受者延迟启动和缩短直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)疗程的实际做法的文献有限。我们比较了接受 HCV 核酸检测阳性(NAT +)肾脏并接受索非布韦/韦帕他韦(SOF/VEL)治疗 12 周或格列卡韦/匹布伦达韦(G/P)治疗 8 周的肾移植受者的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治愈率:对2019年4月至2022年4月期间接受HCV NAT+供体肾移植的HCV阴性成人患者进行回顾性研究,患者接受SOF/VEL治疗12周或G/P治疗8周。主要结果是完成治疗 12 周后的持续病毒学应答(SVR12)。次要结果包括开始使用 DAA 的时间、肾功能、移植物损失、患者死亡、肝功能检测和机会性感染:102 例肾移植受者中,36 例接受了 G/P 治疗,66 例接受了 SOF/VEL 治疗。接受 G/P 治疗的 36 人(100%)均获得了 SVR12。SOF/VEL组中有一名患者未能达到SVR12,但接受了额外治疗后治愈。开始使用 DAA 的时间相似,平均为 4 周。AST/ALT > 3x ULN 或肾功能无差异。每组都发生了一次排斥反应。未发现患者死亡或移植物丢失。组间巨细胞病毒和 BK 病毒血症无差异。 结论:在肾移植受者中延迟开始DAA治疗,使用12周的SOF/VEL或8周的G/P可达到SVR12,且无明显不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信