Modelling strategies supplemental to foot placement for frontal-plane stability in walking.

IF 3.7 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Journal of The Royal Society Interface Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1098/rsif.2024.0191
Michelle J Harter, Mark S Redfern, Patrick J Sparto, Harmut Geyer
{"title":"Modelling strategies supplemental to foot placement for frontal-plane stability in walking.","authors":"Michelle J Harter, Mark S Redfern, Patrick J Sparto, Harmut Geyer","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2024.0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Walking is unstable and requires active control. Foot placement is the primary strategy to maintain frontal-plane balance with contributions from lateral ankle torques, ankle push-off and trunk postural adjustments. Because these strategies interact, their individual contributions are difficult to study. Here, we used computational modelling to understand these individual contributions to frontal-plane walking balance control. A three-dimensional bipedal model was developed based on linear inverted pendulum dynamics. The model included controllers that implement the stabilization strategies seen in human walking. The control parameters were optimized to mimic human gait biomechanics for typical spatio-temporal parameters during steady-state walking and when perturbed by mediolateral ground shifts. Using the optimized model as a starting point, the contributions of each stabilization strategy were explored by progressively removing strategies. The lateral ankle and trunk strategies were more important than ankle push-off, with their removal causing up to 20% worse balance recovery compared with the full model, while removing ankle push-off led to minimal changes. Our results imply a potential benefit of preferentially training these strategies in populations with poor balance. Moreover, the proposed model could be used in future work to investigate how walking stability may be preserved in conditions reflective of injury or disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"21 218","pages":"20240191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2024.0191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walking is unstable and requires active control. Foot placement is the primary strategy to maintain frontal-plane balance with contributions from lateral ankle torques, ankle push-off and trunk postural adjustments. Because these strategies interact, their individual contributions are difficult to study. Here, we used computational modelling to understand these individual contributions to frontal-plane walking balance control. A three-dimensional bipedal model was developed based on linear inverted pendulum dynamics. The model included controllers that implement the stabilization strategies seen in human walking. The control parameters were optimized to mimic human gait biomechanics for typical spatio-temporal parameters during steady-state walking and when perturbed by mediolateral ground shifts. Using the optimized model as a starting point, the contributions of each stabilization strategy were explored by progressively removing strategies. The lateral ankle and trunk strategies were more important than ankle push-off, with their removal causing up to 20% worse balance recovery compared with the full model, while removing ankle push-off led to minimal changes. Our results imply a potential benefit of preferentially training these strategies in populations with poor balance. Moreover, the proposed model could be used in future work to investigate how walking stability may be preserved in conditions reflective of injury or disease.

为步行中的前平面稳定性而对脚的位置进行补充的建模策略。
行走是不稳定的,需要主动控制。脚的摆放是保持前平面平衡的主要策略,踝关节外侧扭矩、踝关节推脱和躯干姿势调整也对其有所贡献。由于这些策略相互影响,因此很难研究它们各自的贡献。在这里,我们使用计算建模来了解这些策略对额面行走平衡控制的贡献。我们基于线性倒立摆动力学开发了一个三维双足模型。该模型包括实现人类行走稳定策略的控制器。对控制参数进行了优化,以模仿人类步态生物力学在稳态行走和受到内外侧地面移动扰动时的典型时空参数。以优化后的模型为起点,通过逐步去除各种策略来探索每种稳定策略的贡献。外侧踝关节和躯干策略比踝关节推移策略更重要,与完整模型相比,去除这两种策略会导致平衡恢复能力下降 20%,而去除踝关节推移策略则变化极小。我们的研究结果表明,在平衡能力较差的人群中优先训练这些策略可能会有好处。此外,所提出的模型还可用于未来的工作中,以研究如何在反映受伤或疾病的情况下保持行走稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Journal of The Royal Society Interface 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信