Michelle J Harter, Mark S Redfern, Patrick J Sparto, Harmut Geyer
{"title":"Modelling strategies supplemental to foot placement for frontal-plane stability in walking.","authors":"Michelle J Harter, Mark S Redfern, Patrick J Sparto, Harmut Geyer","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2024.0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Walking is unstable and requires active control. Foot placement is the primary strategy to maintain frontal-plane balance with contributions from lateral ankle torques, ankle push-off and trunk postural adjustments. Because these strategies interact, their individual contributions are difficult to study. Here, we used computational modelling to understand these individual contributions to frontal-plane walking balance control. A three-dimensional bipedal model was developed based on linear inverted pendulum dynamics. The model included controllers that implement the stabilization strategies seen in human walking. The control parameters were optimized to mimic human gait biomechanics for typical spatio-temporal parameters during steady-state walking and when perturbed by mediolateral ground shifts. Using the optimized model as a starting point, the contributions of each stabilization strategy were explored by progressively removing strategies. The lateral ankle and trunk strategies were more important than ankle push-off, with their removal causing up to 20% worse balance recovery compared with the full model, while removing ankle push-off led to minimal changes. Our results imply a potential benefit of preferentially training these strategies in populations with poor balance. Moreover, the proposed model could be used in future work to investigate how walking stability may be preserved in conditions reflective of injury or disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"21 218","pages":"20240191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2024.0191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Walking is unstable and requires active control. Foot placement is the primary strategy to maintain frontal-plane balance with contributions from lateral ankle torques, ankle push-off and trunk postural adjustments. Because these strategies interact, their individual contributions are difficult to study. Here, we used computational modelling to understand these individual contributions to frontal-plane walking balance control. A three-dimensional bipedal model was developed based on linear inverted pendulum dynamics. The model included controllers that implement the stabilization strategies seen in human walking. The control parameters were optimized to mimic human gait biomechanics for typical spatio-temporal parameters during steady-state walking and when perturbed by mediolateral ground shifts. Using the optimized model as a starting point, the contributions of each stabilization strategy were explored by progressively removing strategies. The lateral ankle and trunk strategies were more important than ankle push-off, with their removal causing up to 20% worse balance recovery compared with the full model, while removing ankle push-off led to minimal changes. Our results imply a potential benefit of preferentially training these strategies in populations with poor balance. Moreover, the proposed model could be used in future work to investigate how walking stability may be preserved in conditions reflective of injury or disease.
期刊介绍:
J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.