Bevacizumab Alone Versus Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yeonhu Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Tae Hoon Roh, Se-Hyuk Kim
{"title":"Bevacizumab Alone Versus Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.","authors":"Yeonhu Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Tae Hoon Roh, Se-Hyuk Kim","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For treating recurrent glioblastoma, for which there is no established treatment, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used alone or with irinotecan. This study was aimed at comparing the survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab monotherapy and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) by using a nationwide population-based dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients matching the International Classification of Diseases code C71.x were screened from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. From January 2008 to November 2021, patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and subsequent standard concurrent chemoradiation with temozolomide were included. Among them, those who received bevacizumab monotherapy or B+I were selected. Demographic characteristics, inpatient stay, prescription frequency, survival outcomes, and steroid prescription duration were compared between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred and forty-six patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 and 396 received bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I, respectively. The corresponding median overall survival from the initial surgery was 22.60 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.50-24.21) and 20.44 months (95% CI, 18.55-22.60; <i>P</i> = 0.508, log-rank test). The B+I group had significantly more bevacizumab prescriptions (median 5 times; BEV group: median 3 times). Cox analysis, based on the postsurgery period, revealed that male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; <i>P</i> = 0.002), older age (HR, 1.01; <i>P</i> = 0.042), and undergoing biopsy instead of surgery (HR, 1.79; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) were significantly associated with decreased survival. Fewer radiotherapy cycles correlated with improved survival outcomes (HR, 0.63; <i>P</i> = 0.001). Cox analysis, conducted from the start of chemotherapy including bevacizumab, showed that male sex was the only variable significantly associated with decreased survival (HR, 1.18; <i>P</i> = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no significant difference in overall survival between the bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I groups. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy could be a suitable treatment option for treating recurrent glioblastoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"39 34","pages":"e244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For treating recurrent glioblastoma, for which there is no established treatment, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used alone or with irinotecan. This study was aimed at comparing the survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab monotherapy and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) by using a nationwide population-based dataset.

Methods: Patients matching the International Classification of Diseases code C71.x were screened from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. From January 2008 to November 2021, patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and subsequent standard concurrent chemoradiation with temozolomide were included. Among them, those who received bevacizumab monotherapy or B+I were selected. Demographic characteristics, inpatient stay, prescription frequency, survival outcomes, and steroid prescription duration were compared between these two groups.

Results: Eight hundred and forty-six patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 and 396 received bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I, respectively. The corresponding median overall survival from the initial surgery was 22.60 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.50-24.21) and 20.44 months (95% CI, 18.55-22.60; P = 0.508, log-rank test). The B+I group had significantly more bevacizumab prescriptions (median 5 times; BEV group: median 3 times). Cox analysis, based on the postsurgery period, revealed that male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; P = 0.002), older age (HR, 1.01; P = 0.042), and undergoing biopsy instead of surgery (HR, 1.79; P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with decreased survival. Fewer radiotherapy cycles correlated with improved survival outcomes (HR, 0.63; P = 0.001). Cox analysis, conducted from the start of chemotherapy including bevacizumab, showed that male sex was the only variable significantly associated with decreased survival (HR, 1.18; P = 0.044).

Conclusion: We found no significant difference in overall survival between the bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I groups. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy could be a suitable treatment option for treating recurrent glioblastoma.

复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者单用贝伐单抗与贝伐单抗加伊立替康治疗效果对比:一项基于全国人群的研究。
背景:复发性胶质母细胞瘤目前尚无成熟的治疗方法,抗血管生成抗体贝伐单抗可单独使用,也可与伊立替康联合使用。本研究旨在通过使用全国范围内的人群数据集,比较接受贝伐单抗单药治疗和接受贝伐单抗加伊立替康联合治疗(B+I)的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存率:从健康保险审查和评估服务数据库中筛选出符合国际疾病分类代码 C71.x 的患者。方法:从健康保险审查评估服务数据库中筛选出符合国际疾病分类代码 C71.x 的患者,纳入 2008 年 1 月至 2021 年 11 月期间接受手术或活检并随后接受替莫唑胺标准同期化疗的患者。其中选择了接受贝伐单抗单药治疗或B+I治疗的患者。比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、住院时间、处方频率、生存结果和类固醇处方持续时间:结果:共纳入846例接受手术或活检并同时接受替莫唑胺化疗的患者。其中,450 名和 396 名患者分别接受了贝伐单抗单药治疗和 B+I 治疗。自初次手术起的相应中位总生存期分别为22.60个月(95%置信区间[CI],20.50-24.21)和20.44个月(95% CI,18.55-22.60;P = 0.508,log-rank检验)。B+I组的贝伐珠单抗处方明显更多(中位数5次;BEV组:中位数3次)。基于术后时间的Cox分析显示,男性(危险比[HR],1.28;P = 0.002)、年龄较大(HR,1.01;P = 0.042)和接受活检而非手术(HR,1.79;P < 0.0001)与生存率下降显著相关。放疗周期越短,生存率越高(HR,0.63;P = 0.001)。从包括贝伐单抗在内的化疗开始进行的Cox分析显示,男性是唯一与生存率下降显著相关的变量(HR,1.18;P = 0.044):我们发现贝伐珠单抗单药组和 B+I 组的总生存率没有明显差异。考虑到伊立替康可能带来的额外毒性,贝伐单抗单药可能是治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的合适治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信