Microtia and Social Media: How Can We Help Our Patients?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Muhammad Arslan, Chloe Cottone, Erinn Mangona, Andre Rafizadeh, Marium Mohsin, Jordan Frey
{"title":"Microtia and Social Media: How Can We Help Our Patients?","authors":"Muhammad Arslan, Chloe Cottone, Erinn Mangona, Andre Rafizadeh, Marium Mohsin, Jordan Frey","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In today's digital era, the intersection of social media and healthcare has emerged as a valuable tool for medical communication and education. However, the use of social media among microtia families has not been thoroughly explored in literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of microtia surgeons on social media, the attitudes of microtia families towards physician social media use, and the motivations behind social media usage among microtia families. This study employed a cross-sectional survey methodology. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess microtia families present in dedicated Instagram and Facebook groups, whereas the presence of microtia surgeons was assessed through responses from an official WhatsApp group. The findings reveal a significant disparity between the demand for microtia surgeons' social media presence and their actual engagement. Although 90.5% of microtia family respondents believed that microtia surgeons should have a presence on social media platforms, only 46.0% of microtia surgeons maintained an active presence. Of microtia families, 55% expressed that they used social media both to facilitate interactions with other families and explore treatment options. Microtia surgeons more often utilized Instagram and Twitter than microtia families. Of microtia families, 40.5% reported using a combination of social media platforms, most often Facebook. This study underscores the increasing reliance on social media for medical information. By increasing their social media presence, microtia surgeons can not only enhance patient education and satisfaction but also contribute to the broader landscape of medical communication and education in the digital age.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today's digital era, the intersection of social media and healthcare has emerged as a valuable tool for medical communication and education. However, the use of social media among microtia families has not been thoroughly explored in literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of microtia surgeons on social media, the attitudes of microtia families towards physician social media use, and the motivations behind social media usage among microtia families. This study employed a cross-sectional survey methodology. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess microtia families present in dedicated Instagram and Facebook groups, whereas the presence of microtia surgeons was assessed through responses from an official WhatsApp group. The findings reveal a significant disparity between the demand for microtia surgeons' social media presence and their actual engagement. Although 90.5% of microtia family respondents believed that microtia surgeons should have a presence on social media platforms, only 46.0% of microtia surgeons maintained an active presence. Of microtia families, 55% expressed that they used social media both to facilitate interactions with other families and explore treatment options. Microtia surgeons more often utilized Instagram and Twitter than microtia families. Of microtia families, 40.5% reported using a combination of social media platforms, most often Facebook. This study underscores the increasing reliance on social media for medical information. By increasing their social media presence, microtia surgeons can not only enhance patient education and satisfaction but also contribute to the broader landscape of medical communication and education in the digital age.

小耳症与社交媒体:我们如何帮助患者?
在当今的数字化时代,社交媒体与医疗保健之间的交叉已成为医疗沟通和教育的重要工具。然而,文献中对小耳症家庭使用社交媒体的情况尚未进行深入探讨。本研究旨在评估小耳症外科医生在社交媒体上的存在情况、小耳症家庭对医生使用社交媒体的态度以及小耳症家庭使用社交媒体的动机。本研究采用了横断面调查方法。采用自填问卷的方式对 Instagram 和 Facebook 专用群组中的小耳症家庭进行评估,而通过官方 WhatsApp 群组的回复对小耳症外科医生的存在情况进行评估。研究结果表明,对小耳症外科医生在社交媒体上的存在的需求与他们的实际参与度之间存在很大差距。尽管90.5%的小耳症家庭受访者认为小耳症外科医生应该在社交媒体平台上占有一席之地,但只有46.0%的小耳症外科医生保持着活跃的存在。55%的小耳症家庭表示,他们使用社交媒体既是为了促进与其他家庭的互动,也是为了探索治疗方案。与小耳症患者相比,小耳症外科医生更经常使用 Instagram 和 Twitter。在小耳症患者家庭中,40.5% 的人表示他们同时使用多个社交媒体平台,其中最常使用的是 Facebook。这项研究强调了人们越来越依赖社交媒体获取医疗信息。小耳症外科医生通过增加他们在社交媒体上的影响力,不仅可以提高患者教育水平和满意度,还可以为数字时代更广泛的医学交流和教育做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信