Fluctuations in resting motor threshold during electroconvulsive and magnetic seizure therapy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Chaojie Liu, Sha Liu, Xiaodong Hu, Zhenglong Guo, Yong Xu
{"title":"Fluctuations in resting motor threshold during electroconvulsive and magnetic seizure therapy.","authors":"Chaojie Liu, Sha Liu, Xiaodong Hu, Zhenglong Guo, Yong Xu","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2024.2401418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is more benign than electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in terms of cognitive impairment. However, whether these two 'artificial seizures' facilitate the central motor neural pathway and the motor cortical effects have not been investigated. The study aimed to compare the effects of ECT and MST on motor-evoked potential (MEP) in patients with mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine patients with mental disorders (major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder type II and schizophrenia [SCZ]) received 6 treatment sessions of vertex MST <i>versus</i> 6 bifrontal ECT treatments in a nonrandomized comparative clinical design. Data on the duration of motor seizures were collected for each treatment. MEP latency and the resting motor threshold (rMT) were measured at baseline and after every two treatments. Comparisons were performed between or within the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seizure durations were significantly longer in the ECT group compared to the MST group across multiple sessions. Both MST and ECT demonstrated a significant reduction in rMT in the left and right hemispheres after the fourth (T3) and sixth treatments (T4) compared to baseline (T1). However, there were no significant changes in MEP latency within or between the groups throughout the treatment sessions. The only difference was that the rMT in the left cerebral hemisphere was significantly lower after T4 than after the second treatment (T2). There was no difference in rMT between the ECT and MST groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both ECT and MST facilitate the central motor pathway, with a shared mechanism of increased motor cortex excitability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2024.2401418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is more benign than electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in terms of cognitive impairment. However, whether these two 'artificial seizures' facilitate the central motor neural pathway and the motor cortical effects have not been investigated. The study aimed to compare the effects of ECT and MST on motor-evoked potential (MEP) in patients with mental disorders.

Methods: Forty-nine patients with mental disorders (major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder type II and schizophrenia [SCZ]) received 6 treatment sessions of vertex MST versus 6 bifrontal ECT treatments in a nonrandomized comparative clinical design. Data on the duration of motor seizures were collected for each treatment. MEP latency and the resting motor threshold (rMT) were measured at baseline and after every two treatments. Comparisons were performed between or within the groups.

Results: Seizure durations were significantly longer in the ECT group compared to the MST group across multiple sessions. Both MST and ECT demonstrated a significant reduction in rMT in the left and right hemispheres after the fourth (T3) and sixth treatments (T4) compared to baseline (T1). However, there were no significant changes in MEP latency within or between the groups throughout the treatment sessions. The only difference was that the rMT in the left cerebral hemisphere was significantly lower after T4 than after the second treatment (T2). There was no difference in rMT between the ECT and MST groups.

Conclusions: Both ECT and MST facilitate the central motor pathway, with a shared mechanism of increased motor cortex excitability.

电休克和磁性癫痫发作治疗期间静息运动阈值的波动。
目的:就认知障碍而言,磁性癫痫发作疗法(MST)比电休克疗法(ECT)更为良性。然而,这两种 "人工癫痫发作 "是否会促进中枢运动神经通路以及运动皮层效应尚未得到研究。本研究旨在比较 ECT 和 MST 对精神障碍患者运动诱发电位(MEP)的影响:方法:49 名精神障碍患者(重度抑郁障碍、双相情感障碍 II 型和精神分裂症)接受了 6 个疗程的顶点 MST 治疗和 6 个疗程的双额叶 ECT 治疗,这是非随机比较临床设计。每次治疗都收集了运动性癫痫发作持续时间的数据。在基线和每两次治疗后测量运动诱发电位(MEP)潜伏期和静息运动阈值(rMT)。在组间或组内进行比较:结果:在多个疗程中,ECT组的发作持续时间明显长于MST组。与基线(T1)相比,MST 和 ECT 在第四次(T3)和第六次(T4)治疗后,左右半球的 rMT 均显著减少。然而,在整个治疗过程中,组内或组间的 MEP 潜伏期均无明显变化。唯一不同的是,左侧大脑半球的 rMT 在 T4 治疗后明显低于第二次治疗(T2)。ECT组和MST组之间的rMT没有差异:结论:ECT和MST都能促进中枢运动通路,其共同机制是提高运动皮层的兴奋性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信