Meat substitutes in Swedish school meals: nutritional quality, ingredients, and insights from meal planners.

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Josephine Pettersson, Anna Post, Maja Elf, Mari Wollmar, Agneta Sjöberg
{"title":"Meat substitutes in Swedish school meals: nutritional quality, ingredients, and insights from meal planners.","authors":"Josephine Pettersson, Anna Post, Maja Elf, Mari Wollmar, Agneta Sjöberg","doi":"10.1080/09637486.2024.2395810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study provides an overview of the ingredients, origin, processing level, nutritional quality and practitioners' insights of commonly used meat substitutes in Swedish school meals. Using quantitative and qualitative data, this study evaluated 59 meat substitutes from 19 brands using Percentage Nutrient Contribution (%NC) to a Swedish school meal based on 30% of the recommended and maximum nutrient intake for teenagers and the NOVA processing framework. Meat substitutes were mince, balls, breaded, burgers, strips, or sausages. Interviews with meal planners (<i>n</i> = 7) revealed experiences with meat substitutes in schools. Most meat substitutes (86%) were classified as ultra-processed foods, with low contributions to saturated fat and free sugars, but high contributions to fibre and salt intakes. Limited micronutrient data suggested significant contributions of potassium, folate, and iron. Meal planners chose meat substitutes for climate reasons, familiarity, and acceptability. Meat substitutes have potential, but processing effects, bioavailability and fortification require further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"637-649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2024.2395810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides an overview of the ingredients, origin, processing level, nutritional quality and practitioners' insights of commonly used meat substitutes in Swedish school meals. Using quantitative and qualitative data, this study evaluated 59 meat substitutes from 19 brands using Percentage Nutrient Contribution (%NC) to a Swedish school meal based on 30% of the recommended and maximum nutrient intake for teenagers and the NOVA processing framework. Meat substitutes were mince, balls, breaded, burgers, strips, or sausages. Interviews with meal planners (n = 7) revealed experiences with meat substitutes in schools. Most meat substitutes (86%) were classified as ultra-processed foods, with low contributions to saturated fat and free sugars, but high contributions to fibre and salt intakes. Limited micronutrient data suggested significant contributions of potassium, folate, and iron. Meal planners chose meat substitutes for climate reasons, familiarity, and acceptability. Meat substitutes have potential, but processing effects, bioavailability and fortification require further research.

瑞典学校膳食中的肉类替代品:营养质量、配料和膳食计划制定者的见解。
本研究概述了瑞典学校膳食中常用肉类替代品的成分、产地、加工水平、营养质量和从业人员的见解。本研究使用定量和定性数据,以瑞典学校膳食中营养素贡献百分比(%NC)为基础,评估了 19 个品牌的 59 种肉类替代品,其营养素贡献百分比为青少年建议和最高营养素摄入量的 30%,并采用了 NOVA 加工框架。肉类替代品包括肉馅、肉丸、面包、汉堡、肉条或香肠。与膳食计划制定者(n = 7)的访谈显示了学校使用肉类替代品的经验。大多数肉类替代品(86%)被归类为超加工食品,饱和脂肪和游离糖含量较低,但纤维和盐摄入量较高。有限的微量营养素数据表明,钾、叶酸和铁的摄入量很高。膳食计划制定者选择肉类替代品的原因包括气候、熟悉程度和可接受性。肉类替代品具有潜力,但加工效果、生物利用率和强化需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition is to integrate food science with nutrition. Improvement of knowledge in human nutrition should always be the final objective of submitted research. It''s an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes high quality, original research contributions to scientific knowledge. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信