The Impact of Upper Abdominal Surgery Regarding the Outcome of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2331-0900
Maximilian Pietschmann, Anna Jaeger, Susanne Reuter, Barbara Schmalfeldt
{"title":"The Impact of Upper Abdominal Surgery Regarding the Outcome of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Maximilian Pietschmann, Anna Jaeger, Susanne Reuter, Barbara Schmalfeldt","doi":"10.1055/a-2331-0900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Residual tumor after cytoreductive surgery is the most important prognostic parameter for the outcome of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (5-year survival rate FIGO III 39%, FIGO IV 20%). As more than half of the patients suffer from upper abdominal tumor burden, surgery in this area is inevitable in order to achieve adequate cytoreduction. Our analysis focuses on the impact of upper abdominal interventions (UAI) regarding residual tumor and prognosis (OS, PFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of n = 261 patients with advanced primary ovarian cancer stage FIGO III and IV and radical cytoreductive surgery at the Gynecologic Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed in a retrospective study design and divided into two groups: one with UAI (n = 160) and one without UAI (n = 101).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with UAI showed significantly more often a residual tumor of less than 1 cm (R1) than patients without UAI and had a significantly longer OS (59 vs. 45 months [p = 0.041]). Deperitonealization of the diaphragm was the most common (144/160) and prognostically most relevant procedure for UAI. Especially the subgroup with FIGO IIIC stage seemed to benefit most from UAI. However, in multivariate analysis residual tumor burden was the strongest prognostic parameter for survival, followed by FIGO stage and UAI. Mortality was low within in the UAI group (0.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UAI is an essential part of cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients with tumor spread into the upper abdomen as it significantly prolongs survival. The procedure appears to be safe with low mortality. Achieving R1 rather than R2 due to radical surgery combined with UAI should be preferred compared to the early termination of the operation, as this has a significant impact on the prognosis of the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2331-0900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Residual tumor after cytoreductive surgery is the most important prognostic parameter for the outcome of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (5-year survival rate FIGO III 39%, FIGO IV 20%). As more than half of the patients suffer from upper abdominal tumor burden, surgery in this area is inevitable in order to achieve adequate cytoreduction. Our analysis focuses on the impact of upper abdominal interventions (UAI) regarding residual tumor and prognosis (OS, PFS).

Methods: A total of n = 261 patients with advanced primary ovarian cancer stage FIGO III and IV and radical cytoreductive surgery at the Gynecologic Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed in a retrospective study design and divided into two groups: one with UAI (n = 160) and one without UAI (n = 101).

Results: Patients with UAI showed significantly more often a residual tumor of less than 1 cm (R1) than patients without UAI and had a significantly longer OS (59 vs. 45 months [p = 0.041]). Deperitonealization of the diaphragm was the most common (144/160) and prognostically most relevant procedure for UAI. Especially the subgroup with FIGO IIIC stage seemed to benefit most from UAI. However, in multivariate analysis residual tumor burden was the strongest prognostic parameter for survival, followed by FIGO stage and UAI. Mortality was low within in the UAI group (0.6%).

Conclusion: UAI is an essential part of cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients with tumor spread into the upper abdomen as it significantly prolongs survival. The procedure appears to be safe with low mortality. Achieving R1 rather than R2 due to radical surgery combined with UAI should be preferred compared to the early termination of the operation, as this has a significant impact on the prognosis of the patients.

上腹手术对晚期卵巢癌患者预后的影响
目的:细胞减灭术后肿瘤残留是晚期卵巢癌患者预后最重要的参数(5 年生存率 FIGO III 为 39%,FIGO IV 为 20%)。由于半数以上的患者存在上腹部肿瘤负担,因此为了达到充分的细胞减灭术,该部位的手术是不可避免的。我们的分析重点是上腹部介入手术(UAI)对残留肿瘤和预后(OS、PFS)的影响:方法:我们采用回顾性研究设计,分析了2014年至2019年期间在汉堡-埃彭多夫妇科癌症中心接受根治性细胞减灭术的FIGO III期和IV期晚期原发性卵巢癌患者,共261例,分为两组:一组有UAI(160例),另一组无UAI(101例):结果:UAI患者的残留肿瘤小于1厘米(R1)的比例明显高于无UAI患者,且OS明显更长(59个月对45个月[p = 0.041])。膈肌腹膜外切除术是最常见的 UAI 手术(144/160),也是与预后最相关的手术。尤其是 FIGO IIIC 分期的亚组似乎从 UAI 中获益最多。然而,在多变量分析中,残余肿瘤负荷是影响生存率的最强预后参数,其次是FIGO分期和UAI。UAI组的死亡率较低(0.6%):结论:对于肿瘤扩散到上腹部的晚期卵巢癌患者来说,UAI是细胞清除手术的重要组成部分,因为它能显著延长患者的生存期。该手术似乎很安全,死亡率很低。与提前终止手术相比,通过根治性手术联合 UAI 达到 R1 而不是 R2 更为可取,因为这对患者的预后有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信