Impact of body composition parameters, age, and tumor staging on gastric cancer prognosis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Wei Li, Hai Zhu, Hai-Zheng Dong, Zheng-Kun Qin, Fu-Ling Huang, Zhu Yu, Shi-Yu Liu, Zhen Wang, Jun-Qiang Chen
{"title":"Impact of body composition parameters, age, and tumor staging on gastric cancer prognosis.","authors":"Wei Li, Hai Zhu, Hai-Zheng Dong, Zheng-Kun Qin, Fu-Ling Huang, Zhu Yu, Shi-Yu Liu, Zhen Wang, Jun-Qiang Chen","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research studies on gastric cancer have not investigated the combined impact of body composition, age, and tumor staging on gastric cancer prognosis. To address this gap, we used machine learning methods to develop reliable prediction models for gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1,132 gastric cancer patients, with preoperative body composition and clinical parameters recorded, analyzed using Cox regression and machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multivariate analysis revealed that several factors were associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer. These factors included age (≥65 years), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, low muscle attenuation (MA), low skeletal muscle index (SMI), and low visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratios (VSR). The decision tree analysis for RFS identified six subgroups, with the TNM staging I, II combined with high MA subgroup showing the most favorable prognosis and the TNM staging III combined with low MA subgroup exhibiting the poorest prognosis. For OS, the decision tree analysis identified seven subgroups, with the subgroup featuring high MA combined with TNM staging I, II showing the best prognosis and the subgroup with low MA, TNM staging II, III, low SMI, and age ≥65 years associated with the worst prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cox regression identified key factors associated with gastric cancer prognosis, and decision tree analysis determined prognoses across different risk factor subgroups. Our study highlights that the combined use of these methods can enhance intervention planning and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research studies on gastric cancer have not investigated the combined impact of body composition, age, and tumor staging on gastric cancer prognosis. To address this gap, we used machine learning methods to develop reliable prediction models for gastric cancer.

Methods: This study included 1,132 gastric cancer patients, with preoperative body composition and clinical parameters recorded, analyzed using Cox regression and machine learning models.

Results: The multivariate analysis revealed that several factors were associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer. These factors included age (≥65 years), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, low muscle attenuation (MA), low skeletal muscle index (SMI), and low visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratios (VSR). The decision tree analysis for RFS identified six subgroups, with the TNM staging I, II combined with high MA subgroup showing the most favorable prognosis and the TNM staging III combined with low MA subgroup exhibiting the poorest prognosis. For OS, the decision tree analysis identified seven subgroups, with the subgroup featuring high MA combined with TNM staging I, II showing the best prognosis and the subgroup with low MA, TNM staging II, III, low SMI, and age ≥65 years associated with the worst prognosis.

Conclusion: Cox regression identified key factors associated with gastric cancer prognosis, and decision tree analysis determined prognoses across different risk factor subgroups. Our study highlights that the combined use of these methods can enhance intervention planning and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer.

身体成分参数、年龄和肿瘤分期对胃癌预后的影响。
背景:有关胃癌的研究尚未调查身体成分、年龄和肿瘤分期对胃癌预后的综合影响。为了弥补这一不足,我们使用机器学习方法开发了可靠的胃癌预测模型:本研究纳入了 1,132 名胃癌患者,记录了他们术前的身体成分和临床参数,并使用 Cox 回归和机器学习模型进行了分析:结果:多变量分析显示,有几个因素与胃癌患者的无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)相关。这些因素包括年龄(≥65 岁)、肿瘤-结节-转移(TNM)分期、低肌肉衰减(MA)、低骨骼肌指数(SMI)和低内脏与皮下脂肪组织面积比(VSR)。RFS的决策树分析确定了六个亚组,其中TNM分期I、II合并高MA亚组的预后最好,TNM分期III合并低MA亚组的预后最差。在OS方面,决策树分析确定了7个亚组,高MA结合TNM分期I、II的亚组预后最好,低MA、TNM分期II、III、低SMI和年龄≥65岁的亚组预后最差:Cox回归确定了与胃癌预后相关的关键因素,决策树分析确定了不同风险因素亚组的预后。我们的研究强调,综合使用这些方法可以加强胃癌的干预计划和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信