Enhancing lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis: implementation and clinical assessment of multiplex PCR-based and hybrid capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105307
Yuyao Yin, Pengyuan Zhu, Yifan Guo, Yingzhen Li, Hongbin Chen, Jun Liu, Lingxiao Sun, Shuai Ma, Chaohui Hu, Hui Wang
{"title":"Enhancing lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis: implementation and clinical assessment of multiplex PCR-based and hybrid capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing.","authors":"Yuyao Yin, Pengyuan Zhu, Yifan Guo, Yingzhen Li, Hongbin Chen, Jun Liu, Lingxiao Sun, Shuai Ma, Chaohui Hu, Hui Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shotgun metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used to detect pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). However, mNGS is complex and expensive. This study explored the feasibility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in distinguishing lower respiratory tract infections in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 229 retrospective BALF samples to establish thresholds and diagnostic values in a prospective cohort of 251 patients. After target pathogen selection, primer and probe design, optimization experiments, and bioinformatics analysis, multiplex PCR-based tNGS (mp-tNGS) and hybrid capture-based tNGS (hc-tNGS), targeting 198 and 3060 pathogens (DNA and RNA co-detection workflow) were established and performed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>mp-tNGS and hc-tNGS took 10.3 and 16 h, respectively, with low sequencing data sizes of 0.1 M and 1 M reads, and test costs reduced to a quarter and half of mNGS. The LoDs of mp-tNGS and hc-tNGS were 50-450 CFU/mL. mp-tNGS and hc-tNGS were highly accurate, with 86.5% and 87.3% (vs. 85.5% for mNGS) sensitivities and 90.0% and 88.0% (vs. 92.1% for mNGS) specificities. tNGS detection rates for casual pathogens were 84.3% and 89.5% (vs. 88.5% for mNGS), significantly higher than conventional microbiological tests (P < 0.001). In seven samples, tNGS detected Pneumocystis jirovecii, a fungus not detected by mNGS. Whereas mNGS detected six samples with filamentous fungi (Rhizopus oryzae, Aureobasidium pullulans, Aspergillus niger complex, etc.) which missed by tNGS. The anaerobic bacteria as pathogen in eight samples was failed to detect by mp-tNGS.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>tNGS may offer a new, broad-spectrum, rapid, accurate and cost-effective approach to diagnosing respiratory infections.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China (81625014 and 82202535).</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105307","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shotgun metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used to detect pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). However, mNGS is complex and expensive. This study explored the feasibility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in distinguishing lower respiratory tract infections in clinical practice.

Methods: We used 229 retrospective BALF samples to establish thresholds and diagnostic values in a prospective cohort of 251 patients. After target pathogen selection, primer and probe design, optimization experiments, and bioinformatics analysis, multiplex PCR-based tNGS (mp-tNGS) and hybrid capture-based tNGS (hc-tNGS), targeting 198 and 3060 pathogens (DNA and RNA co-detection workflow) were established and performed.

Findings: mp-tNGS and hc-tNGS took 10.3 and 16 h, respectively, with low sequencing data sizes of 0.1 M and 1 M reads, and test costs reduced to a quarter and half of mNGS. The LoDs of mp-tNGS and hc-tNGS were 50-450 CFU/mL. mp-tNGS and hc-tNGS were highly accurate, with 86.5% and 87.3% (vs. 85.5% for mNGS) sensitivities and 90.0% and 88.0% (vs. 92.1% for mNGS) specificities. tNGS detection rates for casual pathogens were 84.3% and 89.5% (vs. 88.5% for mNGS), significantly higher than conventional microbiological tests (P < 0.001). In seven samples, tNGS detected Pneumocystis jirovecii, a fungus not detected by mNGS. Whereas mNGS detected six samples with filamentous fungi (Rhizopus oryzae, Aureobasidium pullulans, Aspergillus niger complex, etc.) which missed by tNGS. The anaerobic bacteria as pathogen in eight samples was failed to detect by mp-tNGS.

Interpretation: tNGS may offer a new, broad-spectrum, rapid, accurate and cost-effective approach to diagnosing respiratory infections.

Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China (81625014 and 82202535).

加强下呼吸道感染诊断:基于多重 PCR 和基于混合捕获的定向下一代测序的实施和临床评估。
背景:枪式元基因组新一代测序(mNGS)被广泛用于检测支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中的病原体。 然而,mNGS既复杂又昂贵。本研究探讨了靶向新一代测序(tNGS)在临床实践中区分下呼吸道感染的可行性:我们使用了 229 份回顾性 BALF 样本,在 251 名患者的前瞻性队列中建立了阈值和诊断值。经过目标病原体选择、引物和探针设计、优化实验和生物信息学分析后,我们建立并实施了基于多重 PCR 的 tNGS(mp-tNGS)和基于混合捕获的 tNGS(hc-tNGS),分别针对 198 和 3060 种病原体(DNA 和 RNA 协同检测工作流程)。结果:mp-tNGS 和 hc-tNGS 分别耗时 10.3 小时和 16 小时,测序数据量分别为 0.1 百万和 1 百万读数,测试成本分别降至 mNGS 的四分之一和一半。mp-tNGS 和 hc-tNGS 的 LoDs 为 50-450 CFU/mL。mp-tNGS 和 hc-tNGS 的准确度很高,灵敏度分别为 86.5% 和 87.3%(mNGS 为 85.5%),特异度分别为 90.0% 和 88.0%(mNGS 为 92.1%)。3%和 89.5%(mNGS 为 88.5%),显著高于传统的微生物检测方法(P 解释:tNGS 可为呼吸道感染的诊断提供一种新型、广谱、快速、准确且经济有效的方法:国家自然科学基金(81625014 和 82202535)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信