Silencing siRNA microneedle patches versus silicone sheets in reducing post-surgical scars: a randomized single-blinded intra-individually controlled clinical trial.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Delwyn Zhi Jie Lim, Yong Yao Chun, Amelia Yuting Monteiro, Hui Mei Cheng, Jia Yi Lee, Yingrou Tan, Timothy T Y Tan, Hong Liang Tey
{"title":"Silencing siRNA microneedle patches versus silicone sheets in reducing post-surgical scars: a randomized single-blinded intra-individually controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Delwyn Zhi Jie Lim, Yong Yao Chun, Amelia Yuting Monteiro, Hui Mei Cheng, Jia Yi Lee, Yingrou Tan, Timothy T Y Tan, Hong Liang Tey","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljae347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A common complication of wounds is exuberant growth of fibrotic scar tissue, which can lead to hypertrophic scars or keloids. There are currently no treatments with good evidence for preventing excessive scar tissue formation. In this study, we explored the use of microneedle patches containing siRNA inhibiting SPARC mRNA in reducing the volume of post-surgical scars.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to compare the differences in the volume of post-surgical scars between daily application of siRNA-embedded dissolving microneedle patches and silicone sheets. The primary study outcome measure was the 3D volume of scar elevation.Our hypothesis was that scar formation in the half of the wound treated with siRNA microneedle patches will be lesser, as reflected by a smaller 3D volume, as compared to the half treated with silicone sheets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an 8-week, single-blinded intra-individually controlled randomised trial in a tertiary dermatological centre. Patients with two-week-old post-operative wounds were recruited. Each half of the scar was randomly assigned to the microneedle patch or silicone sheet. Three-dimensional (3D) volumes were obtained from the scars via a high-resolution scanner at day 0, 30 and 60.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At day 30, scars treated with the microneedle patches had a lower geometric mean volume of 0.79mm3 when compared to scars treated with silicone sheets, with a difference in mean percentage volume reduction of 10.70%.At day 60, scars treated with the microneedle patches had a statistically significant lower volume (8.88mm3) when compared to the side treated with silicone sheets (12.77mm3, p=0.005), with a difference in mean percentage reduction of 9.66%. Additionally, there was also a statistically significant difference between the percentage reduction in scar volume, compared to baseline, on the side treated with microneedle patches (mean=83.78%) compared to the side treated with silicone sheets (mean=74.11%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significantly greater reduction in the volume of post-surgical scars on the side treated with microneedle patches compared to the side treated with silicone sheets. This demonstrates the use of transdermal gene silencing technology for scar inhibition and that siRNA microneedle patches can be an effective and safe modality in the reduction of scar tissue formation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12622000558729, https://www.anzctr.org.au.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A common complication of wounds is exuberant growth of fibrotic scar tissue, which can lead to hypertrophic scars or keloids. There are currently no treatments with good evidence for preventing excessive scar tissue formation. In this study, we explored the use of microneedle patches containing siRNA inhibiting SPARC mRNA in reducing the volume of post-surgical scars.

Objective: We aim to compare the differences in the volume of post-surgical scars between daily application of siRNA-embedded dissolving microneedle patches and silicone sheets. The primary study outcome measure was the 3D volume of scar elevation.Our hypothesis was that scar formation in the half of the wound treated with siRNA microneedle patches will be lesser, as reflected by a smaller 3D volume, as compared to the half treated with silicone sheets.

Methods: This was an 8-week, single-blinded intra-individually controlled randomised trial in a tertiary dermatological centre. Patients with two-week-old post-operative wounds were recruited. Each half of the scar was randomly assigned to the microneedle patch or silicone sheet. Three-dimensional (3D) volumes were obtained from the scars via a high-resolution scanner at day 0, 30 and 60.

Results: At day 30, scars treated with the microneedle patches had a lower geometric mean volume of 0.79mm3 when compared to scars treated with silicone sheets, with a difference in mean percentage volume reduction of 10.70%.At day 60, scars treated with the microneedle patches had a statistically significant lower volume (8.88mm3) when compared to the side treated with silicone sheets (12.77mm3, p=0.005), with a difference in mean percentage reduction of 9.66%. Additionally, there was also a statistically significant difference between the percentage reduction in scar volume, compared to baseline, on the side treated with microneedle patches (mean=83.78%) compared to the side treated with silicone sheets (mean=74.11%).

Conclusions: There was a significantly greater reduction in the volume of post-surgical scars on the side treated with microneedle patches compared to the side treated with silicone sheets. This demonstrates the use of transdermal gene silencing technology for scar inhibition and that siRNA microneedle patches can be an effective and safe modality in the reduction of scar tissue formation.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12622000558729, https://www.anzctr.org.au.

沉默 siRNA 微针贴片与硅胶片在减少手术后疤痕方面的比较:单盲随机对照临床试验。
背景:伤口的一个常见并发症是纤维化瘢痕组织的大量生长,这会导致增生性疤痕或瘢痕疙瘩。目前还没有证据表明任何治疗方法可以防止瘢痕组织过度增生。在这项研究中,我们探讨了含有抑制 SPARC mRNA siRNA 的微针贴片在减少手术后疤痕体积方面的应用:我们的目的是比较每天使用含 siRNA 的可溶解微针贴片和硅胶片在手术后疤痕体积上的差异。我们的假设是,使用 siRNA 微针贴片的那一半伤口的疤痕形成会比使用硅胶片的那一半伤口的疤痕形成要少,这反映在较小的三维体积上:这是在一家三级皮肤病中心进行的一项为期 8 周的单盲随机对照试验。试验招募了术后两周的伤口患者。每一半疤痕被随机分配到微针贴片或硅胶片上。在第0天、第30天和第60天,通过高分辨率扫描仪获取疤痕的三维(3D)体积:第30天时,使用微针贴片治疗的疤痕与使用硅胶片治疗的疤痕相比,几何平均体积减少了0.79立方毫米,平均体积减少百分比差异为10.70%。第60天时,使用微针贴片治疗的疤痕与使用硅胶片治疗的疤痕(12.77立方毫米,P=0.005)相比,体积显著减少(8.88立方毫米),平均体积减少百分比差异为9.66%。此外,与基线相比,使用微针贴片治疗的一侧(平均=83.78%)与使用硅胶片治疗的一侧(平均=74.11%)的疤痕体积减少百分比也有显著的统计学差异:结论:使用微针贴片治疗的一侧与使用硅胶片治疗的一侧相比,手术后疤痕的体积明显缩小。这表明透皮基因沉默技术可用于抑制疤痕,而且 siRNA 微针贴片是减少疤痕组织形成的一种有效而安全的方法:澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验登记处(ANZCTR),ACTRN12622000558729,https://www.anzctr.org.au。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信