Do Existing MRI Definitions of Knee Osteoarthritis Identify Knees That Will Develop Clinically Significant Disease Over Up To 11 Years of Follow-Up?

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Alison H Chang, Frank W Roemer, Ali Guermazi, Orit Almagor, Jungwha Julia Lee, Joan S Chmiel, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Jing Song, Leena Sharma
{"title":"Do Existing MRI Definitions of Knee Osteoarthritis Identify Knees That Will Develop Clinically Significant Disease Over Up To 11 Years of Follow-Up?","authors":"Alison H Chang, Frank W Roemer, Ali Guermazi, Orit Almagor, Jungwha Julia Lee, Joan S Chmiel, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Jing Song, Leena Sharma","doi":"10.1002/art.42982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In individuals without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA), we investigated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined knee OA at baseline was associated with incident radiographic and symptomatic disease during up to 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Osteoarthritis Initiative participants without tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA at baseline were assessed for MRI-based tibiofemoral cartilage damage, osteophyte presence, bone marrow lesions, and meniscal damage/extrusion. We defined MRI knee OA using alternative, reported definitions (Def A and Def B). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), and frequent knee symptoms (Sx) were assessed at baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 6-, 8-, and 10/11-year follow-up visits. Incident tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA (outcome) was defined as (1) KL ≥2, (2) KL ≥2 and JSN, or (3) KL ≥2 and Sx. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models examined associations of baseline MRI-defined knee OA (Def A and Def B) with incident outcomes during up to 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,621 participants (mean age ± SD 58.8 ± 9.0 years, mean body mass index ± SD 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 59.5% women), 17% had MRI-defined knee OA by Def A and 24% by Def B. Baseline MRI-defined knee OA was associated with incident KL ≥2 (odds ratio 2.94 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.34-3.68] for Def A and 2.44 [95% CI 1.97-3.03] for Def B). However, a substantial proportion of individuals with baseline MRI-defined knee OA did not develop incident KL ≥2 during follow-up (59% for Def A and 64% for Def B). Findings were similar for the other two outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current MRI definitions of knee OA do not adequately identify knees that will develop radiographic and symptomatic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42982","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In individuals without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA), we investigated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined knee OA at baseline was associated with incident radiographic and symptomatic disease during up to 11 years of follow-up.

Methods: Osteoarthritis Initiative participants without tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA at baseline were assessed for MRI-based tibiofemoral cartilage damage, osteophyte presence, bone marrow lesions, and meniscal damage/extrusion. We defined MRI knee OA using alternative, reported definitions (Def A and Def B). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), and frequent knee symptoms (Sx) were assessed at baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 6-, 8-, and 10/11-year follow-up visits. Incident tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA (outcome) was defined as (1) KL ≥2, (2) KL ≥2 and JSN, or (3) KL ≥2 and Sx. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models examined associations of baseline MRI-defined knee OA (Def A and Def B) with incident outcomes during up to 11 years of follow-up.

Results: Among 1,621 participants (mean age ± SD 58.8 ± 9.0 years, mean body mass index ± SD 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2, 59.5% women), 17% had MRI-defined knee OA by Def A and 24% by Def B. Baseline MRI-defined knee OA was associated with incident KL ≥2 (odds ratio 2.94 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.34-3.68] for Def A and 2.44 [95% CI 1.97-3.03] for Def B). However, a substantial proportion of individuals with baseline MRI-defined knee OA did not develop incident KL ≥2 during follow-up (59% for Def A and 64% for Def B). Findings were similar for the other two outcomes.

Conclusion: Current MRI definitions of knee OA do not adequately identify knees that will develop radiographic and symptomatic disease.

现有的膝关节骨性关节炎 MRI 定义是否能识别出在长达 11 年的随访中会出现临床重大疾病的膝关节?
目的:在没有膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)影像学检查的人群中,我们研究了基线时MRI定义的KOA是否与长达11年的随访中出现的影像学和症状性疾病有关:骨关节炎倡议组织的参与者在基线时没有胫骨股骨放射学 KOA,我们对他们进行了基于 MRI 的胫骨股骨软骨损伤、骨质增生、骨髓病变和半月板损伤/脱出的评估。我们使用其他已报道的定义(定义 A 和定义 B)来定义 MRI KOA。在基线、1-、2-、3-、4-、6-、8-和 10/11 年的随访中评估了 Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) 等级、关节间隙狭窄 (JSN) 和膝关节常见症状 (Sx)。胫骨股骨放射学 KOA 事件(结果)定义为:(1)KL ≥ 2;(2)KL ≥ 2 和 JSN;或(3)KL ≥ 2 和 Sx。调整后的Cox比例危险回归模型检验了基线MRI定义的KOA(Def A和Def B)与长达11年的随访期间发生的结果之间的关系:在1621名参与者中[平均年龄=58.8 (SD=9.0)岁,平均体重指数=27.2 (4.5) kg/m2,59.5%为女性],17%有Def A的MRI定义的KOA,24%有Def B的MRI定义的KOA。基线MRI定义的KOA与KL≥2事件相关[Def A的几率比=2.94 (95% CI=2.34-3.68),Def B的几率比=2.44 (95% CI=1.97-3.03)]。然而,基线 MRI 定义为 KOA 的患者中有相当一部分在随访期间没有出现 KL ≥ 2 的情况(Def A 为 59%,Def B 为 64%)。其他两个结果的结果类似:结论:目前的KOA磁共振成像定义并不能充分识别将出现放射学和症状性疾病的膝关节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信