Using DNA to Predict Education: a Meta-analytic Review

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Kirsty Wilding, Megan Wright, Sophie von Stumm
{"title":"Using DNA to Predict Education: a Meta-analytic Review","authors":"Kirsty Wilding, Megan Wright, Sophie von Stumm","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09928-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent advances in genomics make it possible to predict individual differences in education from polygenic scores that are person-specific aggregates of inherited DNA differences. Here, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the strength of these DNA-based predictions for educational attainment (e.g., years spent in full-time education) and educational achievement (e.g., school grades). For educational attainment (<i>k</i> = 20, <i>n</i> = 16, <i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 314,757), a multilevel meta-analysis showed an association with polygenic scores of <i>ρ</i> = .27 (95% CI from .22 to .32). For educational achievement (<i>k</i> = 19, <i>n</i> = 10, <i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 83,788), the association was <i>ρ</i> = .24 (95% CI from .18 to .30). Eurocentric biases were evident with only 15% of estimates being reported in samples of non-European ancestry. After accounting for sample ancestry, age at assessment, and education measure, the meta-analytic estimates increased to <i>ρ</i> = .29 (95% CI from .24 to .33) for educational attainment and <i>ρ</i> = .50 (95% CI from .39 to .61) for educational achievement, indicative of large effect sizes. All meta-analytic estimates were associated with significant heterogeneity. Our findings suggest that DNA-based predictions of education are sizeable but vary across samples and studies. We outline three steps to safeguard potential applications of polygenic score predictions in education to maximize their benefits for personalizing learning, while minimizing the bioethical risks of perpetuating social, cultural, and economic inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09928-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in genomics make it possible to predict individual differences in education from polygenic scores that are person-specific aggregates of inherited DNA differences. Here, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the strength of these DNA-based predictions for educational attainment (e.g., years spent in full-time education) and educational achievement (e.g., school grades). For educational attainment (k = 20, n = 16, Ntotal = 314,757), a multilevel meta-analysis showed an association with polygenic scores of ρ = .27 (95% CI from .22 to .32). For educational achievement (k = 19, n = 10, Ntotal = 83,788), the association was ρ = .24 (95% CI from .18 to .30). Eurocentric biases were evident with only 15% of estimates being reported in samples of non-European ancestry. After accounting for sample ancestry, age at assessment, and education measure, the meta-analytic estimates increased to ρ = .29 (95% CI from .24 to .33) for educational attainment and ρ = .50 (95% CI from .39 to .61) for educational achievement, indicative of large effect sizes. All meta-analytic estimates were associated with significant heterogeneity. Our findings suggest that DNA-based predictions of education are sizeable but vary across samples and studies. We outline three steps to safeguard potential applications of polygenic score predictions in education to maximize their benefits for personalizing learning, while minimizing the bioethical risks of perpetuating social, cultural, and economic inequalities.

Abstract Image

利用 DNA 预测教育:元分析综述
基因组学的最新进展使我们有可能通过多基因分数预测教育方面的个体差异,多基因分数是遗传 DNA 差异的特定个体集合体。在此,我们对这些基于 DNA 的教育程度(如接受全日制教育的年数)和教育成就(如学校成绩)预测的强度进行了系统回顾和元分析。对于受教育程度(k = 20,n = 16,Ntotal = 314 757),多层次荟萃分析显示与多基因分数的关联度为 ρ = .27(95% CI 为 .22 至 .32)。在教育成就方面(k = 19,n = 10,Ntotal = 83 788),相关性为 ρ = .24(95% CI 从 .18 到 .30)。欧洲中心偏倚明显,只有 15%的估计值是在非欧洲血统样本中报告的。在考虑了样本血统、评估年龄和教育程度后,教育程度的荟萃分析估计值增加到ρ = .29(95% CI 从 .24 到 .33),教育成就的ρ = .50(95% CI 从 .39 到 .61),显示出较大的效应大小。所有荟萃分析估计值都存在显著的异质性。我们的研究结果表明,基于 DNA 的教育预测具有一定规模,但在不同样本和研究中存在差异。我们概述了三个步骤来保护多基因分数预测在教育领域的潜在应用,以最大限度地发挥其在个性化学习方面的优势,同时最大限度地降低延续社会、文化和经济不平等的生物伦理风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信