Does the shipping alliance aggravate or alleviate container shipping market volatility

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Shiyuan Zheng , Kun Wang , Kangyin Dong , Yulai Wan , Xiaowen Fu
{"title":"Does the shipping alliance aggravate or alleviate container shipping market volatility","authors":"Shiyuan Zheng ,&nbsp;Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Kangyin Dong ,&nbsp;Yulai Wan ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Frequent and dramatic container shipping market turbulence has caused concerns among shipping stakeholders and governments around the world. While exogenous shocks such as economic recessions and pandemics are attributed to such turbulence, the changing shipping market structure with the formation of shipping alliances could also play a moderating role. The US government has begun to stipulate stricter policies that restrict shipping alliance development and aim to stabilize the freight rate. In this paper, we examine how shipping alliances can moderate freight rate volatility in the container shipping market. An analytical economic model is first derived to generate theoretical predictions, and an empirical study is then conducted by using real-world shipping market data to verify the theoretical predictions. Specifically, our analytical results suggest that shipping alliances can aggravate the volatility of freight rates when the market shock is from the demand side while alleviating the volatility caused from the supply side. Moreover, shipping alliances always lead to lower volatility in port charges. When the shipping demand (or shipping fuel price, respectively) is stochastic, the alliance-induced cost savings through economies of scale have no impact (or increases, respectively) on differences in volatility in both port charges and shipping freights with and without a shipping alliance. On the basis of panel data of 10 selected Chinese major container shipping routes from 2010 to 2021, a panel data regression model with two-way fixed effects (TWFE) is estimated. The empirical results confirm our analytical conclusions. We construct an integrated economic model to reveal that shipping alliances can affect market risk in a rather implicit way, i.e., through freight rate volatility, which has not been explored. Moreover, our empirical study results support the theoretical results and accurately quantify the impacts of shipping alliances on main international container shipping routes, thereby providing related policy implications for regulators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 104231"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frequent and dramatic container shipping market turbulence has caused concerns among shipping stakeholders and governments around the world. While exogenous shocks such as economic recessions and pandemics are attributed to such turbulence, the changing shipping market structure with the formation of shipping alliances could also play a moderating role. The US government has begun to stipulate stricter policies that restrict shipping alliance development and aim to stabilize the freight rate. In this paper, we examine how shipping alliances can moderate freight rate volatility in the container shipping market. An analytical economic model is first derived to generate theoretical predictions, and an empirical study is then conducted by using real-world shipping market data to verify the theoretical predictions. Specifically, our analytical results suggest that shipping alliances can aggravate the volatility of freight rates when the market shock is from the demand side while alleviating the volatility caused from the supply side. Moreover, shipping alliances always lead to lower volatility in port charges. When the shipping demand (or shipping fuel price, respectively) is stochastic, the alliance-induced cost savings through economies of scale have no impact (or increases, respectively) on differences in volatility in both port charges and shipping freights with and without a shipping alliance. On the basis of panel data of 10 selected Chinese major container shipping routes from 2010 to 2021, a panel data regression model with two-way fixed effects (TWFE) is estimated. The empirical results confirm our analytical conclusions. We construct an integrated economic model to reveal that shipping alliances can affect market risk in a rather implicit way, i.e., through freight rate volatility, which has not been explored. Moreover, our empirical study results support the theoretical results and accurately quantify the impacts of shipping alliances on main international container shipping routes, thereby providing related policy implications for regulators.

航运联盟加剧还是缓解了集装箱航运市场的波动
频繁而剧烈的集装箱航运市场动荡引起了全球航运利益相关者和政府的担忧。虽然经济衰退和大流行病等外来冲击是造成这种动荡的原因,但随着航运联盟的形成,航运市场结构的变化也可能起到缓和作用。美国政府已开始制定更严格的政策,限制航运联盟的发展,旨在稳定运费。本文研究了航运联盟如何缓和集装箱航运市场的运费波动。本文首先推导出一个经济分析模型,得出理论预测,然后利用真实航运市场数据进行实证研究,验证理论预测。具体来说,我们的分析结果表明,当市场冲击来自需求方时,航运联盟会加剧运费的波动,而来自供应方的冲击则会缓解运费的波动。此外,航运联盟总是能降低港口费用的波动性。当航运需求(或航运燃料价格)是随机的,联盟通过规模经济节省的成本对有无航运联盟的港口费和运费的波动差异没有影响(或分别增加)。基于 2010 年至 2021 年中国 10 条主要集装箱航线的面板数据,我们估算了双向固定效应(TWFE)面板数据回归模型。实证结果证实了我们的分析结论。我们构建了一个综合经济模型,揭示了航运联盟能够以一种相当隐性的方式(即通过运费波动)影响市场风险,而这一点尚未得到探讨。此外,我们的实证研究结果支持了理论结果,并准确量化了航运联盟对主要国际集装箱航运路线的影响,从而为监管机构提供了相关的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信