Oral microbiota: Taxonomic composition and functional profile in caries-free and in caries-affected individuals – A systematic review

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Oral microbiota: Taxonomic composition and functional profile in caries-free and in caries-affected individuals – A systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the oral microbiota among caries-free (CF) with caries-affected (CA) individuals, both at taxonomic and at functional levels.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A structured search was carried out in MEDLINE/PUBMED, Web of Science, EMBASE, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus and Google Scholar databases up to September, 2023. Observational studies, without any restriction on date of publication and using next-generation targeted or untargeted sequencing methods for identification of microbial communities were included. Qualitative synthesis was performed from all included studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>54 studies were included (43 cross-sectional; 11 cohort) comprising more than 3486 participants (at least 1666 CF and 1820 CA) whose saliva and/or dental plaque were used as clinical samples. Methodological quality was graded as “fair” for most of the studies. The abundance of 87 bacterial and 44 fungal genera were statistically different among CF and CA individuals. <em>Atopobium</em> spp., <em>Capnocytophaga</em> spp., <em>Lactobacillus</em> spp., <em>Prevotella</em> spp., <em>Scardovia</em> spp., <em>Selenomonas</em> spp. among others were frequently reported as being more abundant in CA individuals. Several functional patterns, such as lipids, carbohydrate, starch, sucrose, amino sugar metabolisms, among others, were identified as being specifically related to CF or to CA conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In spite of the variability among the included studies and of the predominance of qualitative synthesis, groups of microorganisms as well as specific functional profiles coded by the assessed microbiota are differently abundant among caries-affected and caries-free individuals. These results need to be interpreted with caution considering the limitations inherent to each assessed primary study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8288,"journal":{"name":"Archives of oral biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of oral biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003996924001912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the oral microbiota among caries-free (CF) with caries-affected (CA) individuals, both at taxonomic and at functional levels.

Design

This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A structured search was carried out in MEDLINE/PUBMED, Web of Science, EMBASE, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus and Google Scholar databases up to September, 2023. Observational studies, without any restriction on date of publication and using next-generation targeted or untargeted sequencing methods for identification of microbial communities were included. Qualitative synthesis was performed from all included studies.

Results

54 studies were included (43 cross-sectional; 11 cohort) comprising more than 3486 participants (at least 1666 CF and 1820 CA) whose saliva and/or dental plaque were used as clinical samples. Methodological quality was graded as “fair” for most of the studies. The abundance of 87 bacterial and 44 fungal genera were statistically different among CF and CA individuals. Atopobium spp., Capnocytophaga spp., Lactobacillus spp., Prevotella spp., Scardovia spp., Selenomonas spp. among others were frequently reported as being more abundant in CA individuals. Several functional patterns, such as lipids, carbohydrate, starch, sucrose, amino sugar metabolisms, among others, were identified as being specifically related to CF or to CA conditions.

Conclusion

In spite of the variability among the included studies and of the predominance of qualitative synthesis, groups of microorganisms as well as specific functional profiles coded by the assessed microbiota are differently abundant among caries-affected and caries-free individuals. These results need to be interpreted with caution considering the limitations inherent to each assessed primary study.

口腔微生物群:无龋人群和受龋影响人群的分类组成和功能特征 - 系统综述
目的比较无龋(CF)和受龋影响(CA)个体的口腔微生物群,包括分类和功能两个层面。在截至 2023 年 9 月的 MEDLINE/PUBMED、Web of Science、EMBASE、LILACS、SciELO、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中进行了结构化检索。纳入的观察性研究不限发表日期,使用下一代定向或非定向测序方法识别微生物群落。结果共纳入 54 项研究(43 项横断面研究;11 项队列研究),超过 3486 名参与者(至少 1666 名 CF 患者和 1820 名 CA 患者)的唾液和/或牙菌斑被用作临床样本。大多数研究的方法学质量被评为 "一般"。87个细菌属和44个真菌属的丰度在CF和CA个体中存在统计学差异。常有报告称,CA 患者体内的 Atopobium 菌属、Capnocytophaga 菌属、Lactobacillus 菌属、Prevotella 菌属、Scardovia 菌属、Selenomonas 菌属等数量较多。结论尽管所纳入的研究之间存在差异,而且定性合成占主导地位,但在受龋影响和无龋的个体中,微生物群以及由评估微生物群编码的特定功能图谱的丰富程度各不相同。考虑到所评估的每项主要研究固有的局限性,在解释这些结果时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of oral biology
Archives of oral biology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Oral Biology is an international journal which aims to publish papers of the highest scientific quality in the oral and craniofacial sciences. The journal is particularly interested in research which advances knowledge in the mechanisms of craniofacial development and disease, including: Cell and molecular biology Molecular genetics Immunology Pathogenesis Cellular microbiology Embryology Syndromology Forensic dentistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信