Restrictions of cigarette and e-cigarette flavor and filter ventilation on demand and substitution in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Restrictions of cigarette and e-cigarette flavor and filter ventilation on demand and substitution in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Tobacco product design features, including flavors and cigarette filter ventilation, are subject to regulation. This study examined the effects of cigarette and e-cigarette flavors on demand and substitution by preferred cigarette flavor and ventilation in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a mixed between-group (usual cigarette flavor and ventilation)/within-subject design (policy conditions), individuals who use tobacco (n=176 cigarette (60.5 % female); n=91 multiple products (26.7 % female)) were recruited using Ipsos and InnovateMR, completed purchasing trials with increasing cigarette prices in the ETM. Participants were exposed to four conditions in a 2×2 factorial design with cigarette flavors restricted or unrestricted and e-cigarette flavors restricted or unrestricted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In individuals who exclusively smoke cigarettes: 1) Cigarette menthol restrictions decreased willingness to purchase cigarettes (OR: 0.001; 95 % CI: 0.00002, 0.015) for individuals that prefer menthol cigarettes and increased willingness to purchase NRT (OR: 4.02; 95 % CI: 1.47, 11.0), 2) cigarette menthol restrictions reduced demand for cigarettes in individuals who smoke menthol cigarettes (<em>p&lt;0.001</em>), 3) e-cigarette flavor restrictions reduced the degree of e-cigarette substitution in individuals who smoke menthol cigarettes (<em>p</em>=0.028), and 4) preference for higher cigarette filter ventilation was associated with higher demand for cigarettes (p=0.003) and lowered substitution of smokeless tobacco products (<em>p</em>=0.028). In individuals who use multiple tobacco products, restrictions did not impact product purchasing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Strategies to reduce flavored product sales and increase cessation resource accessibility may improve population health by reducing smoking and increasing NRT use in individuals who use menthol cigarettes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance

Tobacco product design features, including flavors and cigarette filter ventilation, are subject to regulation. This study examined the effects of cigarette and e-cigarette flavors on demand and substitution by preferred cigarette flavor and ventilation in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM).

Methods

In a mixed between-group (usual cigarette flavor and ventilation)/within-subject design (policy conditions), individuals who use tobacco (n=176 cigarette (60.5 % female); n=91 multiple products (26.7 % female)) were recruited using Ipsos and InnovateMR, completed purchasing trials with increasing cigarette prices in the ETM. Participants were exposed to four conditions in a 2×2 factorial design with cigarette flavors restricted or unrestricted and e-cigarette flavors restricted or unrestricted.

Results

In individuals who exclusively smoke cigarettes: 1) Cigarette menthol restrictions decreased willingness to purchase cigarettes (OR: 0.001; 95 % CI: 0.00002, 0.015) for individuals that prefer menthol cigarettes and increased willingness to purchase NRT (OR: 4.02; 95 % CI: 1.47, 11.0), 2) cigarette menthol restrictions reduced demand for cigarettes in individuals who smoke menthol cigarettes (p<0.001), 3) e-cigarette flavor restrictions reduced the degree of e-cigarette substitution in individuals who smoke menthol cigarettes (p=0.028), and 4) preference for higher cigarette filter ventilation was associated with higher demand for cigarettes (p=0.003) and lowered substitution of smokeless tobacco products (p=0.028). In individuals who use multiple tobacco products, restrictions did not impact product purchasing.

Conclusion

Strategies to reduce flavored product sales and increase cessation resource accessibility may improve population health by reducing smoking and increasing NRT use in individuals who use menthol cigarettes.

实验性烟草市场中卷烟和电子烟香精和过滤嘴通风对需求和替代的限制
意义烟草产品的设计特征,包括口味和卷烟过滤嘴的通气性,都受到监管。本研究考察了卷烟和电子烟口味对需求的影响,以及在实验烟草市场(ETM)中首选卷烟口味和通气性的替代情况。方法在混合组间设计(常规卷烟口味和通气性)/主体内设计(政策条件)中,使用益普索和创新MR招募了使用烟草的个人(n=176 名卷烟用户(60.5% 为女性);n=91 名多种产品用户(26.7% 为女性)),在 ETM 中完成了卷烟价格上涨的购买试验。结果在只吸卷烟的个体中:1)卷烟薄荷限制降低了偏好薄荷卷烟的个体购买卷烟的意愿(OR:0.001;95 % CI:0.00002, 0.015),增加了购买 NRT 的意愿(OR:4.02;95 % CI:1.2)卷烟薄荷限制降低了吸食薄荷卷烟者对卷烟的需求(p<0.001);3)电子烟口味限制降低了吸食薄荷卷烟者对电子烟的替代程度(p=0.028);4)偏好更高的卷烟过滤嘴通风量与卷烟需求增加(p=0.003)和无烟烟草制品替代程度降低(p=0.028)相关。)在使用多种烟草制品的人群中,限制措施并不影响产品的购买。结论减少调味产品销售和提高戒烟资源可及性的策略可能会通过减少使用薄荷卷烟的人群吸烟和增加无烟烟草制品的使用来改善人群健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信