Subjective cognitive complaints are related to depressive symptoms but not objective impairment in covert cerebral small vessel disease

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anne Arola , Hanna M. Laakso , Heidi Heinonen , Johanna Pitkänen , Matti Ahlström , Juha Lempiäinen , Teemu Paajanen , Jussi Virkkala , Juha Koikkalainen , Jyrki Lötjönen , Antti Korvenoja , Susanna Melkas , Hanna Jokinen
{"title":"Subjective cognitive complaints are related to depressive symptoms but not objective impairment in covert cerebral small vessel disease","authors":"Anne Arola ,&nbsp;Hanna M. Laakso ,&nbsp;Heidi Heinonen ,&nbsp;Johanna Pitkänen ,&nbsp;Matti Ahlström ,&nbsp;Juha Lempiäinen ,&nbsp;Teemu Paajanen ,&nbsp;Jussi Virkkala ,&nbsp;Juha Koikkalainen ,&nbsp;Jyrki Lötjönen ,&nbsp;Antti Korvenoja ,&nbsp;Susanna Melkas ,&nbsp;Hanna Jokinen","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Subjective cognitive complaints are common in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), yet their correspondence to informant evaluations, objective cognitive functions and severity of brain changes are poorly understood. We studied the associations of subjective and informant reports of cognitive difficulties (executive functions and memory) with findings from a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and brain MRI (white matter hyperintensities, WMH volume) as well as depressive symptoms and functional abilities (instrumental activities of daily living, IADL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the Helsinki SVD Study, 152 older adults with varying degrees of WMH but without stroke or dementia were classified as having normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) based on Jak/Bondi neuropsychological criteria. The objective cognitive measures also included continuous domain scores for memory and executive functions. Cognitive complaints were evaluated with the subjective- and informant-versions of Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) and Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX), functional abilities with the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire and depressive symptoms with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Subjective cognitive complaints correlated significantly with informant reports (r=0.40-0.50, p&lt;0.001). After controlling for age, gender and years of education, subjective and informant DEX and PRMQ were not related to MCI or cognitive domain scores (all p-values&gt;0.05). Instead, subjective DEX (OR 1.10, CI 95% 1.05-1.16, p&lt;0.001) and subjective PRMQ (OR 1.06, CI 95% 1.01-1.11, p=0.014) were significantly associated with GDS-15. Informant DEX (standardised β=0.26, p=0.002, f2=0.08) and informant PRMQ (standardised β=0.24, p=0.007, f2=0.06) were significantly related to WMH volume. They were also associated with IADL score (informant DEX, standardised β=-0.33, p=0.001, f2=0.30; informant PRMQ, standardised β=-0.24, p=0.011, f2=0.19).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Neither subjective nor informant-reported cognitive complaints were associated with objective cognitive performance in terms of MCI categorisation or more sensitive domain scores of executive functioning or memory. Informant-evaluations were related to functional impairment in IADL and more severe WMH, whereas subjective complaints only associated with depressive symptoms. These findings suggest that awareness of cognitive impairment may be limited in early-stage SVD and highlight the value of informant assessments in the identification of patients with functional impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024001338/pdfft?md5=8c8b4ccf9ef1d7ab5bc68040c4f5dcf2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666245024001338-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024001338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Subjective cognitive complaints are common in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), yet their correspondence to informant evaluations, objective cognitive functions and severity of brain changes are poorly understood. We studied the associations of subjective and informant reports of cognitive difficulties (executive functions and memory) with findings from a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and brain MRI (white matter hyperintensities, WMH volume) as well as depressive symptoms and functional abilities (instrumental activities of daily living, IADL).

Methods

In the Helsinki SVD Study, 152 older adults with varying degrees of WMH but without stroke or dementia were classified as having normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) based on Jak/Bondi neuropsychological criteria. The objective cognitive measures also included continuous domain scores for memory and executive functions. Cognitive complaints were evaluated with the subjective- and informant-versions of Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) and Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX), functional abilities with the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire and depressive symptoms with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15).

Results

Subjective cognitive complaints correlated significantly with informant reports (r=0.40-0.50, p<0.001). After controlling for age, gender and years of education, subjective and informant DEX and PRMQ were not related to MCI or cognitive domain scores (all p-values>0.05). Instead, subjective DEX (OR 1.10, CI 95% 1.05-1.16, p<0.001) and subjective PRMQ (OR 1.06, CI 95% 1.01-1.11, p=0.014) were significantly associated with GDS-15. Informant DEX (standardised β=0.26, p=0.002, f2=0.08) and informant PRMQ (standardised β=0.24, p=0.007, f2=0.06) were significantly related to WMH volume. They were also associated with IADL score (informant DEX, standardised β=-0.33, p=0.001, f2=0.30; informant PRMQ, standardised β=-0.24, p=0.011, f2=0.19).

Discussion

Neither subjective nor informant-reported cognitive complaints were associated with objective cognitive performance in terms of MCI categorisation or more sensitive domain scores of executive functioning or memory. Informant-evaluations were related to functional impairment in IADL and more severe WMH, whereas subjective complaints only associated with depressive symptoms. These findings suggest that awareness of cognitive impairment may be limited in early-stage SVD and highlight the value of informant assessments in the identification of patients with functional impairment.

主观认知抱怨与抑郁症状有关,但与隐性脑小血管疾病的客观损害无关
导言:主观认知抱怨在脑小血管疾病(SVD)患者中很常见,但人们对其与线人评估、客观认知功能和脑部变化严重程度的对应关系知之甚少。方法 在赫尔辛基 SVD 研究中,根据 Jak/Bondi 神经心理学标准,152 名有不同程度 WMH 但没有中风或痴呆的老年人被分为认知正常或轻度认知障碍 (MCI)。客观认知测量还包括记忆和执行功能的连续领域评分。认知主诉通过前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷(PRMQ)和执行障碍问卷(DEX)的主观版和信息版进行评估,功能能力通过阿姆斯特丹 IADL 问卷进行评估,抑郁症状通过老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)进行评估。结果主观认知主诉与信息报告显著相关(r=0.40-0.50,p<0.001)。在控制年龄、性别和受教育年限后,主观和信息提供者的 DEX 和 PRMQ 与 MCI 或认知领域得分无关(所有 p 值均为 0.05)。相反,主观 DEX(OR 1.10,CI 95% 1.05-1.16,p<0.001)和主观 PRMQ(OR 1.06,CI 95% 1.01-1.11,p=0.014)与 GDS-15 显著相关。知情者 DEX(标准化 β=0.26,p=0.002,f2=0.08)和知情者 PRMQ(标准化 β=0.24,p=0.007,f2=0.06)与 WMH 体积显著相关。讨论无论是主观还是信息报告的认知症状都与 MCI 分类的客观认知表现或执行功能或记忆的更敏感领域得分无关。信息评估与 IADL 功能障碍和更严重的 WMH 相关,而主观主诉仅与抑郁症状相关。这些研究结果表明,早期 SVD 患者对认知功能障碍的认识可能有限,并强调了线人评估在识别功能障碍患者方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信