The relative contributions of aortic and carotid artery stiffness to CeVD and cognition

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Caroline Robert , Lieng-Hsi Ling , Eugene Tan , Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian , Shir Lynn Lim , Lingli Gong , Josephine Berboso , Arthur Mark Richards , Christopher Chen , Chuen Seng Tan , Saima Hilal
{"title":"The relative contributions of aortic and carotid artery stiffness to CeVD and cognition","authors":"Caroline Robert ,&nbsp;Lieng-Hsi Ling ,&nbsp;Eugene Tan ,&nbsp;Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian ,&nbsp;Shir Lynn Lim ,&nbsp;Lingli Gong ,&nbsp;Josephine Berboso ,&nbsp;Arthur Mark Richards ,&nbsp;Christopher Chen ,&nbsp;Chuen Seng Tan ,&nbsp;Saima Hilal","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The relative contributions of aortic and carotid artery stiffness on cognitive impairment and dementia remain unknown. We examined the associations of aortic and carotid artery stiffness with cerebrovascular disease markers, cognition, and dementia subtypes in a memory clinic cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>272 participants underwent applanation tonometry, carotid ultrasonography, 3T brain MRI, and neuropsychological assessment. Aortic stiffness parameters (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic augmentation index, and aortic pulse pressure) were obtained with applanation tonometry whilst carotid artery stiffness parameters (β-index, pressure-strain elastic modulus, and pulse- wave velocity-β) were assessed by carotid ultrasonography, from which composite scores for aortic and carotid artery stiffness were calculated. Brain magnetic resonance images were graded for cerebrovascular disease markers, including white matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes, cerebral microbleeds, cortical infarcts, and stenosis. Cognition was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–Canadian Stroke Network harmonization battery in order to classify participants as having no cognitive impairment, cognitive impairment no dementia, or dementia subtyped as Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After considering both aortic and carotid artery stiffness in the same regression models, carotid artery stiffness remained independently and significantly associated with WMH (β=0.78, p&lt;0.001), cortical infarcts (odds ratio [OR], 1.05, p=0.003), vascular dementia (OR, 1.10, p=0.017), MMSE (β=-0.89, p=0.013), global cognition (β=-0.33, p=0.017), and visuomotor speed (β=-0.19, p=0.004). Although aortic stiffness was associated with lacunes (OR, 1.09, p=0.035), and cortical infarcts (OR, 1.063, p=0.016), these associations became non-significant after adjusting for carotid artery stiffness.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>We found that compared with aortic stiffness, carotid artery stiffness had more robust associations with markers of cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia, and cognitive function in memory clinic patients. Our study suggests that carotid artery stiffness may have a more salient effect on the brain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000709/pdfft?md5=9d31fee77818a94c3565794c15fecbe1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666245024000709-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The relative contributions of aortic and carotid artery stiffness on cognitive impairment and dementia remain unknown. We examined the associations of aortic and carotid artery stiffness with cerebrovascular disease markers, cognition, and dementia subtypes in a memory clinic cohort.

Methods

272 participants underwent applanation tonometry, carotid ultrasonography, 3T brain MRI, and neuropsychological assessment. Aortic stiffness parameters (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic augmentation index, and aortic pulse pressure) were obtained with applanation tonometry whilst carotid artery stiffness parameters (β-index, pressure-strain elastic modulus, and pulse- wave velocity-β) were assessed by carotid ultrasonography, from which composite scores for aortic and carotid artery stiffness were calculated. Brain magnetic resonance images were graded for cerebrovascular disease markers, including white matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes, cerebral microbleeds, cortical infarcts, and stenosis. Cognition was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–Canadian Stroke Network harmonization battery in order to classify participants as having no cognitive impairment, cognitive impairment no dementia, or dementia subtyped as Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia.

Results

After considering both aortic and carotid artery stiffness in the same regression models, carotid artery stiffness remained independently and significantly associated with WMH (β=0.78, p<0.001), cortical infarcts (odds ratio [OR], 1.05, p=0.003), vascular dementia (OR, 1.10, p=0.017), MMSE (β=-0.89, p=0.013), global cognition (β=-0.33, p=0.017), and visuomotor speed (β=-0.19, p=0.004). Although aortic stiffness was associated with lacunes (OR, 1.09, p=0.035), and cortical infarcts (OR, 1.063, p=0.016), these associations became non-significant after adjusting for carotid artery stiffness.

Discussion

We found that compared with aortic stiffness, carotid artery stiffness had more robust associations with markers of cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia, and cognitive function in memory clinic patients. Our study suggests that carotid artery stiffness may have a more salient effect on the brain.

主动脉和颈动脉僵化对心血管疾病和认知的相对影响
导言:主动脉和颈动脉僵化对认知障碍和痴呆症的相对影响尚不清楚。我们在一个记忆诊所队列中研究了主动脉和颈动脉僵化与脑血管疾病标志物、认知能力和痴呆亚型之间的关系。主动脉僵硬度参数(颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度、主动脉增强指数和主动脉脉压)通过眼压测量法获得,颈动脉僵硬度参数(β指数、压力-应变弹性模量和脉搏波速度-β)通过颈动脉超声波检查法进行评估,并据此计算出主动脉和颈动脉僵硬度的综合评分。脑磁共振图像对脑血管疾病标志物进行分级,包括白质高密度(WMH)、裂隙、脑微出血、皮质梗塞和狭窄。认知能力通过小型精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和美国国立神经疾病和卒中研究所-加拿大卒中网络协调电池进行评估,以便将参与者分为无认知障碍、认知障碍无痴呆或痴呆亚型(阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆)。结果在同一回归模型中同时考虑主动脉和颈动脉僵硬度后,颈动脉僵硬度仍与WMH(β=0.78,p<0.001)、皮质梗塞(比值比 [OR],1.05,p=0.003)、血管性痴呆(OR,1.10,p=0.017)、MMSE(β=-0.89,p=0.013)、整体认知(β=-0.33,p=0.017)和视觉运动速度(β=-0.19,p=0.004)。讨论我们发现,与主动脉僵硬度相比,颈动脉僵硬度与记忆门诊患者的脑血管疾病标志物、血管性痴呆和认知功能有更密切的关系。我们的研究表明,颈动脉僵化可能对大脑有更显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信