Diverging destinies: How children are faring under demographic transition

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Glory Narjinary , Srinivas Goli
{"title":"Diverging destinies: How children are faring under demographic transition","authors":"Glory Narjinary ,&nbsp;Srinivas Goli","doi":"10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>India reached the replacement level of fertility in 2020. However, the journey of fertility transition is unconventional and heterogeneous within the country and across the different socio-economic groups. The fertility transition is considered to be faster than its socio-economic and health transition in several states. Thus, it has been presumed that the returns to fertility decline are heterogeneous across the states and population sub-groups. Our specific hypothesis is that although rich and poor, and educated and un-educated, everyone had significantly contributed to the fertility decline in response to family planning policies, only those socio-economically better-off have been investing relatively more in their children compared to the poor, and this has led to diverging destinies for children. We tested this supposition using a macro-level panel dataset (1992–2021), fixed and random effects, and IV regression models. The results confirm that child health care and outcomes have diverged while fertility declined from 1992 to 2021. These results are sustained in multiple robustness checks. While fertility is declining with highly state-sponsored family planning programmes, the persistent socio-economic inequalities are leading to unequal progress in health outcomes for children in India.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50554,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Human Biology","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X24000819","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India reached the replacement level of fertility in 2020. However, the journey of fertility transition is unconventional and heterogeneous within the country and across the different socio-economic groups. The fertility transition is considered to be faster than its socio-economic and health transition in several states. Thus, it has been presumed that the returns to fertility decline are heterogeneous across the states and population sub-groups. Our specific hypothesis is that although rich and poor, and educated and un-educated, everyone had significantly contributed to the fertility decline in response to family planning policies, only those socio-economically better-off have been investing relatively more in their children compared to the poor, and this has led to diverging destinies for children. We tested this supposition using a macro-level panel dataset (1992–2021), fixed and random effects, and IV regression models. The results confirm that child health care and outcomes have diverged while fertility declined from 1992 to 2021. These results are sustained in multiple robustness checks. While fertility is declining with highly state-sponsored family planning programmes, the persistent socio-economic inequalities are leading to unequal progress in health outcomes for children in India.

不同的命运:人口结构转型期的儿童状况
印度的生育率在 2020 年达到更替水平。然而,在印度国内和不同的社会经济群体中,生育率过渡的历程是非常规的,也是异质的。在一些邦,生育率转型被认为快于其社会经济和健康转型。因此,人们推测生育率下降的回报在各州和人口亚群体之间是不一样的。我们的具体假设是,尽管富人和穷人、受过教育的人和未受过教育的人,每个人都对计划生育政策导致的生育率下降做出了重大贡献,但只有那些社会经济条件较好的人与穷人相比,对子女的投资相对较多,这导致了儿童命运的分化。我们使用宏观面板数据集(1992-2021 年)、固定效应和随机效应以及 IV 回归模型对这一假设进行了检验。结果证实,从 1992 年到 2021 年,在生育率下降的同时,儿童医疗保健和结果也出现了分化。这些结果在多重稳健性检验中得到了证实。虽然生育率在国家高度支持的计划生育计划下有所下降,但持续存在的社会经济不平等导致印度儿童健康成果的进展不均衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economics & Human Biology
Economics & Human Biology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics and Human Biology is devoted to the exploration of the effect of socio-economic processes on human beings as biological organisms. Research covered in this (quarterly) interdisciplinary journal is not bound by temporal or geographic limitations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信