Exposing the pitfalls of plastics mechanical recycling through cost calculation

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Nicola Van Camp , Irdanto Saputra Lase , Steven De Meester , Sophie Hoozée , Kim Ragaert
{"title":"Exposing the pitfalls of plastics mechanical recycling through cost calculation","authors":"Nicola Van Camp ,&nbsp;Irdanto Saputra Lase ,&nbsp;Steven De Meester ,&nbsp;Sophie Hoozée ,&nbsp;Kim Ragaert","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The plastic industry needs to match the recycling goals set by the EU. Next to technological hurdles, the cost of plastics mechanical recycling is an important modality in this transition. This paper reveals how business economic cost calculation can expose significant pitfalls in the recycling process, by unravelling limitations and boundary conditions, such as scale. By combining the business economic methodology with a Material Flow Analysis, this paper shows the influence of mass retention of products, the capacity of the processing lines, scaling of input capacity, and waste composition on the recycling process and associated costs. Two cases were investigated: (i) the Initial Sorting in a medium size Material Recovery Facility and (ii) an improved mechanical recycling process for flexibles − known as the Quality Recycling Process − consisting of Additional Sorting and Improved Recycling. Assessing the whole recycling chain gives a more holistic insight into the influences of choices and operating parameters on subsequent costs in other parts of the chain and results in a more accurate cost of recycled plastic products. This research concluded that the cost of Initial Sorting of flexibles is 110,08–122,53 EUR/t, while the cost of subsequent Additional Sorting and Improved Recycling ranges from 566,26 EUR/t for rPE Flex to 735,47 EUR/t for rPP Film, these insights can be used to determine a fair price for plastic products. For the Quality Recycling Process it was shown that rationalisation according to the identified pitfalls can reduce the cost per tonne of product by 15–26%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"189 ","pages":"Pages 300-313"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24004513/pdfft?md5=6d6a5d4d534e4bf7926706ca567cc524&pid=1-s2.0-S0956053X24004513-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24004513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The plastic industry needs to match the recycling goals set by the EU. Next to technological hurdles, the cost of plastics mechanical recycling is an important modality in this transition. This paper reveals how business economic cost calculation can expose significant pitfalls in the recycling process, by unravelling limitations and boundary conditions, such as scale. By combining the business economic methodology with a Material Flow Analysis, this paper shows the influence of mass retention of products, the capacity of the processing lines, scaling of input capacity, and waste composition on the recycling process and associated costs. Two cases were investigated: (i) the Initial Sorting in a medium size Material Recovery Facility and (ii) an improved mechanical recycling process for flexibles − known as the Quality Recycling Process − consisting of Additional Sorting and Improved Recycling. Assessing the whole recycling chain gives a more holistic insight into the influences of choices and operating parameters on subsequent costs in other parts of the chain and results in a more accurate cost of recycled plastic products. This research concluded that the cost of Initial Sorting of flexibles is 110,08–122,53 EUR/t, while the cost of subsequent Additional Sorting and Improved Recycling ranges from 566,26 EUR/t for rPE Flex to 735,47 EUR/t for rPP Film, these insights can be used to determine a fair price for plastic products. For the Quality Recycling Process it was shown that rationalisation according to the identified pitfalls can reduce the cost per tonne of product by 15–26%.

通过成本计算揭示塑料机械回收的陷阱
塑料行业需要达到欧盟设定的回收目标。除技术障碍外,塑料机械回收的成本也是这一转变的重要方式。本文揭示了商业经济成本计算如何通过揭示限制和边界条件(如规模)来揭示回收过程中的重大隐患。通过将商业经济方法与物料流分析相结合,本文展示了产品的质量保留、加工生产线的能力、输入能力的规模以及废物成分对回收过程和相关成本的影响。本文对两个案例进行了研究:(i) 中等规模材料回收设施的初始分拣;(ii) 改进后的柔性材料机械回收流程(称为 "优质回收流程"),包括额外分拣和改进回收。对整个回收链进行评估,可以更全面地了解选择和操作参数对回收链其他部分后续成本的影响,从而得出更准确的回收塑料产品成本。这项研究得出的结论是,柔性塑料的初始分拣成本为 110.08-122.53 欧元/吨,而后续附加分拣和改进回收的成本从 566.26 欧元/吨(rPE 柔性塑料)到 735.47 欧元/吨(rPP 薄膜)不等。对于优质回收流程,根据已发现的隐患进行合理化,可将每吨产品的成本降低 15-26%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信