Effects of Sandbag-Free Follow-up After Manual Compression in Patients Who Underwent Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Intervention.

Ahmet Soylu, Ahmet Taha Şahin, Hasan Kan, Hasan Sarı, Sefa Tatar
{"title":"Effects of Sandbag-Free Follow-up After Manual Compression in Patients Who Underwent Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Intervention.","authors":"Ahmet Soylu, Ahmet Taha Şahin, Hasan Kan, Hasan Sarı, Sefa Tatar","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2024.59987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Femoral access site complications (ASC) are frequent yet significant conditions associated with percutaneous intervention procedures that affect patient-physician comfort. In this study, we compared ASC rates between patients who received compression with a sandbag, the standard practice in many clinics, and patients monitored solely with bedrest without sandbag compression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients undergoing any transfemoral percutaneous intervention (mostly coronary interventions) between April 2019 and May 2023 at our clinic. Patients were classified into two groups: those monitored without a sandbag (n = 160) and those with a sandbag (n = 158). ASC rates (ecchymosis, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, bleeding) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed between the two groups in gender, age, sheath size, and bed rest times. Complications were observed in 16.9% (n = 27) of patients without sandbags and 25.3% (n = 40) of patients with sandbags. The most common complication was ecchymosis, seen in 10.6% (n = 17) of the no-sandbag group and 13.9% (n = 22) of the sandbag group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following manual compression after femoral sheath removal, patients receiving bedrest without sandbag use are less likely to develop ASC. Additionally, dismissing sandbag use leads to a significant increase in patient comfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2024.59987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Femoral access site complications (ASC) are frequent yet significant conditions associated with percutaneous intervention procedures that affect patient-physician comfort. In this study, we compared ASC rates between patients who received compression with a sandbag, the standard practice in many clinics, and patients monitored solely with bedrest without sandbag compression.

Methods: This study included patients undergoing any transfemoral percutaneous intervention (mostly coronary interventions) between April 2019 and May 2023 at our clinic. Patients were classified into two groups: those monitored without a sandbag (n = 160) and those with a sandbag (n = 158). ASC rates (ecchymosis, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, bleeding) were compared between the two groups.

Results: No differences were observed between the two groups in gender, age, sheath size, and bed rest times. Complications were observed in 16.9% (n = 27) of patients without sandbags and 25.3% (n = 40) of patients with sandbags. The most common complication was ecchymosis, seen in 10.6% (n = 17) of the no-sandbag group and 13.9% (n = 22) of the sandbag group.

Conclusion: Following manual compression after femoral sheath removal, patients receiving bedrest without sandbag use are less likely to develop ASC. Additionally, dismissing sandbag use leads to a significant increase in patient comfort.

经股动脉入路经皮介入治疗患者人工按压后无沙袋随访的效果。
目的:股骨入路部位并发症(ASC)是经皮介入手术中经常出现的严重并发症,会影响患者和医生的舒适度。在这项研究中,我们比较了接受沙袋压迫(许多诊所的标准做法)的患者与仅卧床监测而不接受沙袋压迫的患者之间的 ASC 发生率:本研究纳入了 2019 年 4 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在本诊所接受任何经股动脉经皮介入治疗(主要是冠状动脉介入治疗)的患者。患者分为两组:无沙袋监测组(n = 160)和有沙袋监测组(n = 158)。比较两组患者的 ASC 发生率(瘀斑、假性动脉瘤、血肿、出血):结果:两组患者在性别、年龄、鞘大小和卧床时间上没有差异。在未使用沙袋的患者中,16.9%(n = 27)的患者出现并发症;在使用沙袋的患者中,25.3%(n = 40)的患者出现并发症。最常见的并发症是瘀斑,无沙袋组为10.6%(n = 17),有沙袋组为13.9%(n = 22):结论:切除股骨鞘后进行人工压迫,卧床休息而不使用沙袋的患者发生 ASC 的几率较低。此外,不使用沙袋可显著提高患者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信