Risk factors of cardiac arrest during a percutaneous coronary intervention performed with rotational atherectomy - analysis based on a Large National Registry.

Wojciech Siłka, Zbigniew Siudak, Krzysztof P Malinowski, Wojciech Wańha, Tomasz Pawłowski, Arkadiusz Pietrasik, Janusz Sielski, Karol Kaziród-Wolski, Łukasz Kołtowski, Wojciech Wojakowski, Jacek Legutko, Stanisław Bartuś, Rafał Januszek
{"title":"Risk factors of cardiac arrest during a percutaneous coronary intervention performed with rotational atherectomy - analysis based on a Large National Registry.","authors":"Wojciech Siłka, Zbigniew Siudak, Krzysztof P Malinowski, Wojciech Wańha, Tomasz Pawłowski, Arkadiusz Pietrasik, Janusz Sielski, Karol Kaziród-Wolski, Łukasz Kołtowski, Wojciech Wojakowski, Jacek Legutko, Stanisław Bartuś, Rafał Januszek","doi":"10.5603/cj.97069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotational atherectomy (RA) is traditionally administered for patients with heavily calcified lesions and is thereby characterized by a high risk of the performed intervention. However, the prevalence characteristics of cardiac arrest are poorly studied in this group of patients. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of cardiac arrest during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed with RA and preceding coronary angiography (CA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the data collected in the Polish Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (ORPKI) from 2014 to 2021, we included 6522 patients who were treated with RA-assisted PCI. We scrutinized patient and procedural characteristics, as well as periprocedural complications, subsequently comparing groups in terms of cardiac arrest incidence with the use of univariable and multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five (0.5%) patients suffered from cardiac arrest during RA-PCI or preceding CA. They were characterized by significantly higher rates of prior stroke, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as indications and higher Killip class (P < 0.001) at the admission time. Among the confirmed independent predictors of in-procedure cardiac arrest, the following can be noted: factors related to patients' clinical characteristics (e.g., older age, female sex, and disease burden), periprocedural characteristics (e.g., PCI within left main coronary artery [LMCA]), and periprocedural complications (e.g., coronary artery perforation and no-reflow phenomenon).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe clinical condition at baseline, expressed by ACS presence and Killip class IV, as well as RA-PCI performed within LMCA and other periprocedural complications, were the strongest predictors of cardiac arrest during RA-assisted PCI and CA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.97069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rotational atherectomy (RA) is traditionally administered for patients with heavily calcified lesions and is thereby characterized by a high risk of the performed intervention. However, the prevalence characteristics of cardiac arrest are poorly studied in this group of patients. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of cardiac arrest during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed with RA and preceding coronary angiography (CA).

Methods: Based on the data collected in the Polish Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (ORPKI) from 2014 to 2021, we included 6522 patients who were treated with RA-assisted PCI. We scrutinized patient and procedural characteristics, as well as periprocedural complications, subsequently comparing groups in terms of cardiac arrest incidence with the use of univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results: Thirty-five (0.5%) patients suffered from cardiac arrest during RA-PCI or preceding CA. They were characterized by significantly higher rates of prior stroke, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as indications and higher Killip class (P < 0.001) at the admission time. Among the confirmed independent predictors of in-procedure cardiac arrest, the following can be noted: factors related to patients' clinical characteristics (e.g., older age, female sex, and disease burden), periprocedural characteristics (e.g., PCI within left main coronary artery [LMCA]), and periprocedural complications (e.g., coronary artery perforation and no-reflow phenomenon).

Conclusions: Severe clinical condition at baseline, expressed by ACS presence and Killip class IV, as well as RA-PCI performed within LMCA and other periprocedural complications, were the strongest predictors of cardiac arrest during RA-assisted PCI and CA.

使用旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间心脏骤停的风险因素--基于大型国家登记处的分析。
背景:传统上,旋转式动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA)适用于钙化严重的病变患者,因此介入治疗的风险很高。然而,对这类患者心脏骤停的流行特征研究甚少。我们旨在评估使用 RA 和冠状动脉造影术(CA)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间心脏骤停的频率和风险因素:根据波兰有创心脏病学手术登记处(ORPKI)从 2014 年至 2021 年收集的数据,我们纳入了 6522 名接受 RA 辅助 PCI 治疗的患者。我们仔细研究了患者和手术特征以及围手术期并发症,随后使用单变量和多变量分析比较了各组的心脏骤停发生率:35例(0.5%)患者在RA-PCI或CA前发生心脏骤停。他们的特点是既往中风、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)作为适应症以及入院时 Killip 分级较高(P < 0.001)。在已证实的术中心脏骤停独立预测因素中,可以注意到以下几点:与患者临床特征相关的因素(如年龄较大、女性和疾病负担)、围术期特征(如在左冠状动脉主干[LMCA]内行PCI)和围术期并发症(如冠状动脉穿孔和无回流现象):结论:基线时的严重临床状况(以存在 ACS 和 Killip 分级 IV 表示)以及在 LMCA 内进行的 RA-PCI 和其他围手术期并发症是 RA 辅助 PCI 和 CA 期间心脏骤停的最强预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信