Perceived acceptability of online volunteer-led exercise classes: Perspectives of rural volunteer exercise leaders and older people.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Natalie McDermott, Md Saifur Rahman, Rachel Winterton, Nazmul Ahasan, Carly Barnes, Adelle Kennedy
{"title":"Perceived acceptability of online volunteer-led exercise classes: Perspectives of rural volunteer exercise leaders and older people.","authors":"Natalie McDermott, Md Saifur Rahman, Rachel Winterton, Nazmul Ahasan, Carly Barnes, Adelle Kennedy","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed perceived acceptability of online rural volunteer-led exercise classes among volunteer leaders and older people during the COVID-19 pandemic and interrogate differences in acceptability between older people who were currently participating in regular exercise and those who were not.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A case study was conducted of an existing volunteer-led exercise program using a cross-sectional preintervention survey (38 volunteer exercise leaders and 172 program participants).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty per cent (n = 11) of the volunteer leaders reported an interest in running the online classes. Motivations included providing opportunities for participants and keeping themselves and participants fit. Thirty-four per cent (n = 42) of the older participants reported an intent to join the online classes, which was primarily attributed to the desire to keep active and to socialise. However, over 60% of the respondents across both categories did not want to engage in online exercise classes. This was primarily attributed to a preference for face-to-face classes and lack of confidence in conducting or using online activities or services. Older participants who did not regularly exercise were statistically more likely to report perceived challenges attending an online class, and to identify the use of internet-based technologies as a barrier to attendance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital literacy was a challenge for the older respondents, particularly for those who were not currently engaged in regular exercise. Organisations implementing online exercise programs should recognise that this form of delivery will pose challenges to cohorts of rural older people who are not undertaking regular physical activity and address the individual and environmental barriers to digital uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed perceived acceptability of online rural volunteer-led exercise classes among volunteer leaders and older people during the COVID-19 pandemic and interrogate differences in acceptability between older people who were currently participating in regular exercise and those who were not.

Method: A case study was conducted of an existing volunteer-led exercise program using a cross-sectional preintervention survey (38 volunteer exercise leaders and 172 program participants).

Results: Thirty per cent (n = 11) of the volunteer leaders reported an interest in running the online classes. Motivations included providing opportunities for participants and keeping themselves and participants fit. Thirty-four per cent (n = 42) of the older participants reported an intent to join the online classes, which was primarily attributed to the desire to keep active and to socialise. However, over 60% of the respondents across both categories did not want to engage in online exercise classes. This was primarily attributed to a preference for face-to-face classes and lack of confidence in conducting or using online activities or services. Older participants who did not regularly exercise were statistically more likely to report perceived challenges attending an online class, and to identify the use of internet-based technologies as a barrier to attendance.

Conclusion: Digital literacy was a challenge for the older respondents, particularly for those who were not currently engaged in regular exercise. Organisations implementing online exercise programs should recognise that this form of delivery will pose challenges to cohorts of rural older people who are not undertaking regular physical activity and address the individual and environmental barriers to digital uptake.

网上志愿者指导的锻炼课程的可接受性:农村志愿运动领导者和老年人的观点。
研究目的本研究评估了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,志愿者领导者和老年人对农村志愿者领导的在线锻炼课程的可接受性,并询问了目前定期参加锻炼的老年人和未参加锻炼的老年人在可接受性方面的差异:方法:通过干预前的横断面调查(38 名志愿运动领导者和 172 名计划参与者),对现有的志愿者领导的运动计划进行了案例研究:结果:30%(n = 11)的志愿者领导表示有兴趣开设在线课程。他们的动机包括为参与者提供机会,以及让自己和参与者保持健康。34%(n = 42)的老年参与者表示有意参加在线课程,这主要是因为他们希望保持活跃和社交。然而,超过 60% 的两类受访者都不想参加在线锻炼课程。这主要是因为他们更喜欢面对面的课程,以及对开展或使用在线活动或服务缺乏信心。据统计,不经常锻炼的老年参与者更有可能认为参加在线课程有困难,并认为使用互联网技术是参加在线课程的障碍:数字素养是老年受访者面临的一项挑战,尤其是对于那些目前没有定期锻炼的人来说。实施在线锻炼计划的机构应认识到,这种授课形式将对那些没有定期参加体育锻炼的农村老年人群构成挑战,并应解决个人和环境对数字化学习的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信