Encompassing trust in medical AI from the perspective of medical students: a quantitative comparative study.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Anamaria Malešević, Mária Kolesárová, Anto Čartolovni
{"title":"Encompassing trust in medical AI from the perspective of medical students: a quantitative comparative study.","authors":"Anamaria Malešević, Mária Kolesárová, Anto Čartolovni","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01092-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the years to come, artificial intelligence will become an indispensable tool in medical practice. The digital transformation will undoubtedly affect today's medical students. This study focuses on trust from the perspective of three groups of medical students - students from Croatia, students from Slovakia, and international students studying in Slovakia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A paper-pen survey was conducted using a non-probabilistic convenience sample. In the second half of 2022, 1715 students were surveyed at five faculties in Croatia and three in Slovakia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Specifically, 38.2% of students indicated familiarity with the concept of AI, while 44.8% believed they would use AI in the future. Patient readiness for the implementation of technologies was mostly assessed as being low. More than half of the students, 59.1%, believe that the implementation of digital technology (AI) will negatively impact the patient-physician relationship and 51,3% of students believe that patients will trust physicians less. The least agreement with the statement was observed among international students, while a higher agreement was expressed by Slovak and Croatian students 40.9% of Croatian students believe that users do not trust the healthcare system, 56.9% of Slovak students agree with this view, while only 17.3% of international students share this opinion. The ability to explain to patients how AI works if they were asked was statistically significantly different for the different student groups, international students expressed the lowest agreement, while the Slovak and Croatian students showed a higher agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides insight into medical students' attitudes from Croatia, Slovakia, and international students regarding the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the future healthcare system, with a particular emphasis on the concept of trust. A notable difference was observed between the three groups of students, with international students differing from their Croatian and Slovak colleagues. This study also highlights the importance of integrating AI topics into the medical curriculum, taking into account national social & cultural specificities that could negatively impact AI implementation if not carefully addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01092-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the years to come, artificial intelligence will become an indispensable tool in medical practice. The digital transformation will undoubtedly affect today's medical students. This study focuses on trust from the perspective of three groups of medical students - students from Croatia, students from Slovakia, and international students studying in Slovakia.

Methods: A paper-pen survey was conducted using a non-probabilistic convenience sample. In the second half of 2022, 1715 students were surveyed at five faculties in Croatia and three in Slovakia.

Results: Specifically, 38.2% of students indicated familiarity with the concept of AI, while 44.8% believed they would use AI in the future. Patient readiness for the implementation of technologies was mostly assessed as being low. More than half of the students, 59.1%, believe that the implementation of digital technology (AI) will negatively impact the patient-physician relationship and 51,3% of students believe that patients will trust physicians less. The least agreement with the statement was observed among international students, while a higher agreement was expressed by Slovak and Croatian students 40.9% of Croatian students believe that users do not trust the healthcare system, 56.9% of Slovak students agree with this view, while only 17.3% of international students share this opinion. The ability to explain to patients how AI works if they were asked was statistically significantly different for the different student groups, international students expressed the lowest agreement, while the Slovak and Croatian students showed a higher agreement.

Conclusion: This study provides insight into medical students' attitudes from Croatia, Slovakia, and international students regarding the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the future healthcare system, with a particular emphasis on the concept of trust. A notable difference was observed between the three groups of students, with international students differing from their Croatian and Slovak colleagues. This study also highlights the importance of integrating AI topics into the medical curriculum, taking into account national social & cultural specificities that could negatively impact AI implementation if not carefully addressed.

从医学生的角度看医学人工智能中的信任:一项定量比较研究。
背景介绍未来几年,人工智能将成为医疗实践中不可或缺的工具。数字化转型无疑将影响当今的医学生。本研究主要从克罗地亚学生、斯洛伐克学生和在斯洛伐克学习的留学生这三类医学生的角度来探讨信任问题:方法:采用非概率方便抽样进行纸笔调查。2022 年下半年,对克罗地亚 5 个学院和斯洛伐克 3 个学院的 1715 名学生进行了调查:具体而言,38.2%的学生表示熟悉人工智能的概念,44.8%的学生认为他们将来会使用人工智能。大部分学生认为患者对使用技术的准备程度较低。超过半数(59.1%)的学生认为,数字技术(人工智能)的应用将对医患关系产生负面影响,51.3%的学生认为患者对医生的信任度会降低。国际学生对这一说法的认同度最低,而斯洛伐克和克罗地亚学生的认同度较高,40.9%的克罗地亚学生认为用户不信任医疗系统,56.9%的斯洛伐克学生同意这一观点,而只有 17.3%的国际学生赞同这一观点。不同学生群体在被问及是否有能力向患者解释人工智能是如何工作的问题上存在显著统计学差异,留学生的认同度最低,而斯洛伐克和克罗地亚学生的认同度较高:本研究深入探讨了克罗地亚、斯洛伐克和国际学生对人工智能(AI)在未来医疗系统中的作用的态度,并特别强调了信任的概念。三组学生之间存在明显差异,留学生与克罗地亚和斯洛伐克留学生的态度不同。本研究还强调了将人工智能主题纳入医学课程的重要性,同时考虑到国家社会和文化的特殊性,如果不认真对待这些特殊性,可能会对人工智能的实施产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信