Phyto-cytogenotoxic potential assessment of two medicinal plants: Davilla nitida (Vahl) Kubitzki and Davilla elliptica (A. St.-Hill) (Dilleniaceae).

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fábio Eduardo Dos Santos, Daniel Rinaldo, Larissa Fonseca Andrade Vieira
{"title":"Phyto-cytogenotoxic potential assessment of two medicinal plants: <i>Davilla nitida</i> (Vahl) Kubitzki and <i>Davilla elliptica</i> (A. St.-Hill) (Dilleniaceae).","authors":"Fábio Eduardo Dos Santos, Daniel Rinaldo, Larissa Fonseca Andrade Vieira","doi":"10.1080/15287394.2024.2397649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans have been using plants in the treatment of various diseases for millennia. Currently, even with allopathic medicines available, numerous populations globally still use plants for therapeutic purposes. Although plants constitute a safer alternative compared to synthetic agents, it is well established that medicinal plants might also exert adverse effects. Thus, the present investigation aimed to assess the phytotoxic, cytotoxic, and genotoxic potential of two plants from the Brazilian Cerrado used in popular medicine, <i>Davilla nitida</i> (Vahl) Kubitzki, and <i>Davilla elliptica</i> (A. St.-Hil.). To this end, germination, growth, and cell cycle analyses were conducted using the plant model <i>Lactuca sativa</i>. Seeds and roots were treated with 0.0625 to 1 g/L for 48 hr under controlled conditions. The germination test demonstrated significant phytotoxic effects for both species at the highest concentrations tested, while none of the extracts produced significant effects in the lettuce growth test. In the microscopic analyses, the aneugenic and cytotoxic action of <i>D. elliptica</i> was evident. In the case of <i>D. nitida</i> greater clastogenic action and induction of micronuclei, (MN) were noted suggesting that the damage initiated by exposure to these extracts was not repaired or led to apoptosis. These findings indicated that the observed plant damage was transmitted to the next generation of cells by way of MN. These differences in the action of the two species may not be attributed to qualitative variations in the composition of the extracts as both are similar, but to quantitative differences associated with synergistic and antagonistic interactions between the compounds present in these extracts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part A-Current Issues","volume":" ","pages":"895-909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part A-Current Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2024.2397649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans have been using plants in the treatment of various diseases for millennia. Currently, even with allopathic medicines available, numerous populations globally still use plants for therapeutic purposes. Although plants constitute a safer alternative compared to synthetic agents, it is well established that medicinal plants might also exert adverse effects. Thus, the present investigation aimed to assess the phytotoxic, cytotoxic, and genotoxic potential of two plants from the Brazilian Cerrado used in popular medicine, Davilla nitida (Vahl) Kubitzki, and Davilla elliptica (A. St.-Hil.). To this end, germination, growth, and cell cycle analyses were conducted using the plant model Lactuca sativa. Seeds and roots were treated with 0.0625 to 1 g/L for 48 hr under controlled conditions. The germination test demonstrated significant phytotoxic effects for both species at the highest concentrations tested, while none of the extracts produced significant effects in the lettuce growth test. In the microscopic analyses, the aneugenic and cytotoxic action of D. elliptica was evident. In the case of D. nitida greater clastogenic action and induction of micronuclei, (MN) were noted suggesting that the damage initiated by exposure to these extracts was not repaired or led to apoptosis. These findings indicated that the observed plant damage was transmitted to the next generation of cells by way of MN. These differences in the action of the two species may not be attributed to qualitative variations in the composition of the extracts as both are similar, but to quantitative differences associated with synergistic and antagonistic interactions between the compounds present in these extracts.

两种药用植物的植物致细胞毒素潜力评估:Davilla nitida (Vahl) Kubitzki 和 Davilla elliptica (A. St.-Hill) (莳萝科)。
千百年来,人类一直利用植物治疗各种疾病。目前,即使有了对抗疗法药物,全球仍有许多人使用植物进行治疗。虽然与合成药物相比,植物是一种更安全的替代品,但药用植物也可能产生不良影响,这一点已得到公认。因此,本调查旨在评估巴西塞拉多地区两种常用药用植物 Davilla nitida (Vahl) Kubitzki 和 Davilla elliptica (A. St.-Hil.) 的植物毒性、细胞毒性和基因毒性潜力。为此,我们使用 Lactuca sativa 植物模型进行了发芽、生长和细胞周期分析。在受控条件下,用 0.0625 至 1 克/升的浓度处理种子和根 48 小时。发芽试验表明,在测试的最高浓度下,两种提取物都有明显的植物毒性作用,而在莴苣生长试验中,没有一种提取物产生明显的影响。在显微分析中,D. elliptica 的脱氧和细胞毒性作用非常明显。在 D. nitida 的情况中,发现了更大的致畸作用和微核(MN)诱导作用,这表明暴露于这些提取物所造成的损害并没有得到修复或导致细胞凋亡。这些发现表明,观察到的植物损伤是通过 MN 的方式传递给下一代细胞的。这两种萃取物作用上的差异可能并不是因为萃取物成分的质的变化,因为这两种萃取物的成分是相似的,而是与这些萃取物中存在的化合物之间的协同作用和拮抗作用有关的量的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.20%
发文量
46
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A , Current Issues is an authoritative journal that features strictly refereed original research in the field of environmental sciences, public and occupational health, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信