The association between plasma fatty acids and risk of lung cancer: a prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jianv Huang, Jiacong Li, Lu He, Junyan Miao, Meng Zhu, Juncheng Dai, Guangfu Jin, Hongxia Ma, Dong Hang, Hongbing Shen
{"title":"The association between plasma fatty acids and risk of lung cancer: a prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank.","authors":"Jianv Huang, Jiacong Li, Lu He, Junyan Miao, Meng Zhu, Juncheng Dai, Guangfu Jin, Hongxia Ma, Dong Hang, Hongbing Shen","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Fatty acids (FAs) have emerged as significant contributors to tumorigenesis, yet prospective evidence regarding their specific effects on lung cancer risk remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between plasma FAs and lung cancer incidence, as well as a potential modification effect of genetic susceptibility on lung cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study was conducted involving 112,547 cancer-free participants from the UK Biobank, with measurements of plasma FAs, including saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) at baseline (2006-2010). Cox regression models were employed to assess lung cancer risk according to plasma FA quartiles or 1-SD increment. Furthermore, interaction between plasma FAs and polygenic risk score (PRS) was evaluated using an additive model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over an average 10.9-year follow-up, 1122 lung cancer cases occurred. After multivariable adjustment, MUFAs were positively associated with lung cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR] per 1-SD = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.54). In contrast, PUFAs, particularly n-3 PUFAs, n-6 PUFAs, docosahexaenoic acid, and linoleic acid, were associated with a lower risk of lung cancer, with HRs ranging from 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.87) to 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95). SFAs were not significantly associated with lung cancer risk. Moreover, we observed an additive interaction between plasma PUFAs and genetic risk. Individuals with a high genetic risk and the lowest quartile of plasma PUFAs had the highest risk of lung cancer (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.43-3.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that plasma PUFAs may serve as protective factors, while MUFAs represent risk factors for lung cancer, offering novel insights into lung cancer carcinogenesis and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Fatty acids (FAs) have emerged as significant contributors to tumorigenesis, yet prospective evidence regarding their specific effects on lung cancer risk remains scarce.

Objective: To investigate the association between plasma FAs and lung cancer incidence, as well as a potential modification effect of genetic susceptibility on lung cancer risk.

Methods: A cohort study was conducted involving 112,547 cancer-free participants from the UK Biobank, with measurements of plasma FAs, including saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) at baseline (2006-2010). Cox regression models were employed to assess lung cancer risk according to plasma FA quartiles or 1-SD increment. Furthermore, interaction between plasma FAs and polygenic risk score (PRS) was evaluated using an additive model.

Results: Over an average 10.9-year follow-up, 1122 lung cancer cases occurred. After multivariable adjustment, MUFAs were positively associated with lung cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR] per 1-SD = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.54). In contrast, PUFAs, particularly n-3 PUFAs, n-6 PUFAs, docosahexaenoic acid, and linoleic acid, were associated with a lower risk of lung cancer, with HRs ranging from 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.87) to 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95). SFAs were not significantly associated with lung cancer risk. Moreover, we observed an additive interaction between plasma PUFAs and genetic risk. Individuals with a high genetic risk and the lowest quartile of plasma PUFAs had the highest risk of lung cancer (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.43-3.38).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that plasma PUFAs may serve as protective factors, while MUFAs represent risk factors for lung cancer, offering novel insights into lung cancer carcinogenesis and prevention.

血浆脂肪酸与肺癌风险之间的关系:英国生物库前瞻性队列研究。
背景:脂肪酸(FAs)已成为肿瘤发生的重要因素,但有关其对肺癌风险具体影响的前瞻性证据仍然很少:调查血浆脂肪酸与肺癌发病率之间的关系,以及遗传易感性对肺癌风险的潜在调节作用:英国生物库(UK Biobank)的112547名未患癌症的参与者参与了一项队列研究,并在基线(2006-2010年)测量了血浆脂肪酸,包括饱和脂肪酸(SFA)、单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)和多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)。根据血浆脂肪酸四分位数或1-SD增量,采用Cox回归模型评估肺癌风险。此外,还采用加法模型评估了血浆脂肪酸与多基因风险评分(PRS)之间的相互作用:结果:在平均 10.9 年的随访中,共发现 1122 例肺癌病例。经多变量调整后,MUFA 与肺癌风险呈正相关(每 1-SD 的危险比 [HR] = 1.32,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.13-1.54)。相比之下,PUFAs,尤其是 n-3 PUFAs、n-6 PUFAs、二十二碳六烯酸和亚油酸与较低的肺癌风险相关,HR 值从 0.79(95% CI:0.72-0.87)到 0.89(95% CI:0.83-0.95)不等。SFA与肺癌风险无明显相关性。此外,我们还观察到血浆中的 PUFAs 与遗传风险之间存在相加作用。遗传风险高且血浆 PUFAs 最低四分位数的个体罹患肺癌的风险最高(HR = 2.20,95% CI:1.43-3.38):我们的研究结果表明,血浆中的 PUFAs 可能是肺癌的保护因素,而 MUFAs 则是肺癌的危险因素,这为肺癌的发生和预防提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信