The Dual-layer CGuard Stent Is Safe and Effective in Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting and in Tandem Occlusions: a Multi-centric Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mousa Zidan, Yves Leonard Voss, Marcel Wolf, Fee Keil, Carolin Brockmann, Christian Gronemann, Nils Christian Lehnen, Daniel Paech, Hannes Nordmeyer, Franziska Dorn
{"title":"The Dual-layer CGuard Stent Is Safe and Effective in Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting and in Tandem Occlusions: a Multi-centric Study.","authors":"Mousa Zidan, Yves Leonard Voss, Marcel Wolf, Fee Keil, Carolin Brockmann, Christian Gronemann, Nils Christian Lehnen, Daniel Paech, Hannes Nordmeyer, Franziska Dorn","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01455-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual-layer stents have fallen into disrepute after several studies reported high rates of in-stent occlusions in acute stroke treatments. The CGuard stent is a new-generation hybrid dual-layer stent that has been designed to provide less thrombogenicity and to prevent peri- and postinterventional emboli. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CGuard stent for the acute treatment of occlusion or high-grade stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with and without concomitant intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent emergent carotid artery stenting (CAS) with the CGuard stent were identified and analyzed from the stroke registries from four tertiary German stroke centers. Clinical, procedural, and imaging data were evaluated. Stent patency within 72 h, intracranial hemorrhage, and modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge were the safety and efficacy end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, ninety-six patients were included (mean age 70.2 ± 11.8, 66 males (68.8%), median NIHSS score at admission 11 (7-17), IV lysis: n = 44 (45.8%)). Stent placement was successful in all patients. Eighty-three (86.4%) patients had tandem occlusions. In-stent occlusion occurred in 5 patients (5.2%) and 3 patients developed early in-stent stenosis (3.1%). Median mRS at discharge was 2 (1-4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this multicenter study, the use of the dual-layer CGuard stent for emergent CAS, particularly in tandem occlusions, was safe and resulted in low rates of in-stent occlusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01455-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual-layer stents have fallen into disrepute after several studies reported high rates of in-stent occlusions in acute stroke treatments. The CGuard stent is a new-generation hybrid dual-layer stent that has been designed to provide less thrombogenicity and to prevent peri- and postinterventional emboli. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CGuard stent for the acute treatment of occlusion or high-grade stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with and without concomitant intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO).

Methods: All patients who underwent emergent carotid artery stenting (CAS) with the CGuard stent were identified and analyzed from the stroke registries from four tertiary German stroke centers. Clinical, procedural, and imaging data were evaluated. Stent patency within 72 h, intracranial hemorrhage, and modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge were the safety and efficacy end points.

Results: Overall, ninety-six patients were included (mean age 70.2 ± 11.8, 66 males (68.8%), median NIHSS score at admission 11 (7-17), IV lysis: n = 44 (45.8%)). Stent placement was successful in all patients. Eighty-three (86.4%) patients had tandem occlusions. In-stent occlusion occurred in 5 patients (5.2%) and 3 patients developed early in-stent stenosis (3.1%). Median mRS at discharge was 2 (1-4).

Conclusion: In this multicenter study, the use of the dual-layer CGuard stent for emergent CAS, particularly in tandem occlusions, was safe and resulted in low rates of in-stent occlusions.

Abstract Image

双层 CGuard 支架在紧急颈动脉支架植入术和串联闭塞中安全有效:一项多中心研究。
背景:在几项研究报告了急性中风治疗中支架内闭塞的高发生率后,双层支架已名声扫地。CGuard 支架是新一代混合双层支架,其设计旨在减少血栓形成,防止介入前后栓塞。本研究旨在评估 CGuard 支架用于急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)伴有或不伴有颅内大血管闭塞(LVO)患者颅内颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞或高度狭窄的急性治疗的安全性和有效性:方法:从德国四家三级卒中中心的卒中登记资料中识别并分析了所有使用 CGuard 支架进行紧急颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)的患者。对临床、手术和成像数据进行了评估。支架72小时内的通畅率、颅内出血和出院时的改良Rankin评分(mRS)是安全性和有效性的终点:共纳入 96 名患者(平均年龄为 70.2 ± 11.8 岁,66 名男性(68.8%),入院时 NIHSS 评分中位数为 11(7-17)分,静脉溶栓:n = 44(45.8%))。所有患者都成功植入了支架。83例(86.4%)患者出现串联闭塞。5名患者(5.2%)出现支架内闭塞,3名患者出现支架内早期狭窄(3.1%)。出院时的中位mRS为2(1-4):在这项多中心研究中,使用双层CGuard支架进行急诊CAS,尤其是串联闭塞,是安全的,而且支架内闭塞的发生率很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信