Physical activity modification over time according to socioeconomic position: results from the EPIC-Italy cohort study.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001957
Matteo Franco, Luigi Facchini, Carlotta Sacerdote, Giovanna Masala, Luca Manfredi, Lucia Dansero, Benedetta Bendinelli, Melania Assedi, Valentina Vitale, Valeria Pala, Saverio Caini, Fulvio Ricceri
{"title":"Physical activity modification over time according to socioeconomic position: results from the EPIC-Italy cohort study.","authors":"Matteo Franco, Luigi Facchini, Carlotta Sacerdote, Giovanna Masala, Luca Manfredi, Lucia Dansero, Benedetta Bendinelli, Melania Assedi, Valentina Vitale, Valeria Pala, Saverio Caini, Fulvio Ricceri","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study aimed to investigate how physical activity (PA) changes over an 11-year follow-up among adults from different socioeconomic positions (SEP) near retirement age. Moreover, an analysis of different PA types is considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the EPIC-Italy cohort. We evaluated PA using the Cambridge Physical Activity Index (CPAI) and the metabolic equivalent of tasks (MET) per hour of activity for recreational PA and household PA. Educational level was assessed using the Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Occupational classes were classified according to LIFEPATH Consortium knowledge. Logistic regression was used to analyse PA among SEP and changes during follow-up. Analyses were also conducted separately for sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The higher educated were more prevalent in the higher quartile of recreational PA than the lower educated both at baseline and follow-up (37% vs 28% and 37% vs 27%, respectively). At the baseline, the lower educated had a higher risk of being physically inactive than the higher educated based on recreational PA (overall OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.60). Manual workers did not show a higher risk of less PA than professionals/managers (overall OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.16).At follow-up, the lower educated and manual workers showed a higher risk of being physically inactive (lower educated OR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.56; manual worker OR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.50). The analyses of changes in PA showed that those who were less educated or manual workers had a higher risk of worsening their PA during the follow-up period, particularly women in recreational PA and men in CPAI measurement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals who had a disadvantaged SEP showed a higher risk of performing less PA over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"e001957"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Our study aimed to investigate how physical activity (PA) changes over an 11-year follow-up among adults from different socioeconomic positions (SEP) near retirement age. Moreover, an analysis of different PA types is considered.

Methods: We used data from the EPIC-Italy cohort. We evaluated PA using the Cambridge Physical Activity Index (CPAI) and the metabolic equivalent of tasks (MET) per hour of activity for recreational PA and household PA. Educational level was assessed using the Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Occupational classes were classified according to LIFEPATH Consortium knowledge. Logistic regression was used to analyse PA among SEP and changes during follow-up. Analyses were also conducted separately for sex.

Results: The higher educated were more prevalent in the higher quartile of recreational PA than the lower educated both at baseline and follow-up (37% vs 28% and 37% vs 27%, respectively). At the baseline, the lower educated had a higher risk of being physically inactive than the higher educated based on recreational PA (overall OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.60). Manual workers did not show a higher risk of less PA than professionals/managers (overall OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.16).At follow-up, the lower educated and manual workers showed a higher risk of being physically inactive (lower educated OR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.56; manual worker OR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.50). The analyses of changes in PA showed that those who were less educated or manual workers had a higher risk of worsening their PA during the follow-up period, particularly women in recreational PA and men in CPAI measurement.

Conclusion: Individuals who had a disadvantaged SEP showed a higher risk of performing less PA over time.

根据社会经济地位随时间改变的体育活动:EPIC-意大利队列研究的结果。
研究目的我们的研究旨在调查临近退休年龄的不同社会经济地位(SEP)的成年人在 11 年的跟踪调查中身体活动(PA)的变化情况。此外,还考虑对不同类型的体力活动进行分析:我们使用了 EPIC-Italy 队列的数据。我们使用剑桥体力活动指数(CPAI)和每小时活动的代谢当量(MET)对娱乐性体力活动和家庭体力活动进行了评估。教育水平采用相对不平等指数(RII)进行评估。职业类别根据 LIFEPATH 联合会的知识进行分类。逻辑回归用于分析 SEP 之间的 PA 以及随访期间的变化。此外,还对性别进行了单独分析:结果:在基线和随访期间,受教育程度较高者比受教育程度较低者在娱乐性活动量方面处于较高四分位数的比例更高(分别为 37% 对 28% 和 37% 对 27%)。在基线时,根据娱乐性活动量,受教育程度较低的人比受教育程度较高的人有更高的缺乏体力活动的风险(总体 OR:1.50,95% CI 1.40 至 1.60)。在随访中,教育程度较低者和体力劳动者缺乏运动的风险较高(教育程度较低者OR:1.46,95% CI 1.37至1.56;体力劳动者OR:1.33,95% CI 1.18至1.50)。对PA变化的分析表明,教育程度较低或体力劳动者在随访期间PA恶化的风险较高,尤其是在娱乐性PA方面的女性和在CPAI测量方面的男性:结论:随着时间的推移,SEP 条件较差的人进行较少的 PA 的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信