Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002066
Kerry Peek, Julia Georgieva, A Serner, Filip Orest
{"title":"Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.","authors":"Kerry Peek, Julia Georgieva, A Serner, Filip Orest","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the incidence of headers, attempted headers, and other head impacts, and the difference in heading descriptors, including technical performance, between men and women in a purposive sample of FIFA World Cup 2022 (FWC22) and FIFA Women's World Cup (FWWC23) matches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Video analysis of all observed headers, attempted headers and other head impacts during eight FWC matches (FWC22 (n=4); FWWC23 (n=4)) where the same national teams competed. Heading descriptors (including ball delivery method, purpose of the header and involvement of other players) and technical performance of each header (including controlled or uncontrolled header, use of upper body, point of head contact) were analysed using negative binomial regression analyses with men as the reference group (reported as incidence rate ratios (IRR)). Timing of eye closure was analysed using a t-test; α-error, p=<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 973 head impacts, 845 (87%) were headers (FWC22 mean 5.0 headers/player/match, FWWC23 mean 4.6 headers/player/match), 93 (10%) were attempted headers and 35 (4%) were unintentional head impacts. When compared with men, women were less likely to perform controlled headers (73% vs 83%, IRR 1.20, p=0.01), use their foreheads (IRR 2.36, p=<0.001) and their upper body during the header (80% vs 88%, IRR 1.29, p=0.005). Women also closed their eyes earlier before the header (1.91 vs 1.56 frames, d=0.41, p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant differences in heading technique between women and men, which could be important to address in training to improve heading performance and potentially reduce short-term and long-term burden of heading.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"e002066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the incidence of headers, attempted headers, and other head impacts, and the difference in heading descriptors, including technical performance, between men and women in a purposive sample of FIFA World Cup 2022 (FWC22) and FIFA Women's World Cup (FWWC23) matches.

Methods: Video analysis of all observed headers, attempted headers and other head impacts during eight FWC matches (FWC22 (n=4); FWWC23 (n=4)) where the same national teams competed. Heading descriptors (including ball delivery method, purpose of the header and involvement of other players) and technical performance of each header (including controlled or uncontrolled header, use of upper body, point of head contact) were analysed using negative binomial regression analyses with men as the reference group (reported as incidence rate ratios (IRR)). Timing of eye closure was analysed using a t-test; α-error, p=<0.05.

Results: From 973 head impacts, 845 (87%) were headers (FWC22 mean 5.0 headers/player/match, FWWC23 mean 4.6 headers/player/match), 93 (10%) were attempted headers and 35 (4%) were unintentional head impacts. When compared with men, women were less likely to perform controlled headers (73% vs 83%, IRR 1.20, p=0.01), use their foreheads (IRR 2.36, p=<0.001) and their upper body during the header (80% vs 88%, IRR 1.29, p=0.005). Women also closed their eyes earlier before the header (1.91 vs 1.56 frames, d=0.41, p=0.002).

Conclusion: There were significant differences in heading technique between women and men, which could be important to address in training to improve heading performance and potentially reduce short-term and long-term burden of heading.

2022 年国际足联世界杯和 2023 年国际足联女足世界杯比赛中男女足球运动员的头球技术表现差异。
目的比较国际足联 2022 年世界杯(FWC22)和国际足联女足世界杯(FWWC23)比赛中男女球员头球、试图头球和其他头部撞击的发生率,以及头球描述符(包括技术表现)的差异:方法:对同一支国家队参加的八场 FWC 比赛(FWC22 (n=4); FWWC23 (n=4) )中所有观察到的头球、试图头球和其他头部撞击进行视频分析。以男性为参照组,使用负二项回归分析法对头球描述(包括发球方式、头球目的和其他球员的参与)和每次头球的技术表现(包括受控或非受控头球、上半身的使用、头部接触点)进行了分析(以发生率比 (IRR) 报告)。闭眼时间采用 t 检验进行分析;α 误差,p= 结果:在 973 次头部撞击中,845 次(87%)是头部撞击(FWC22 平均 5.0 次/球员/比赛,FWWC23 平均 4.6 次/球员/比赛),93 次(10%)是试图头部撞击,35 次(4%)是无意头部撞击。与男性相比,女性不太可能进行有控制的头球(73% vs 83%,IRR 1.20,p=0.01)、使用前额(IRR 2.36,p=结论:女性和男性在头球技术方面存在明显差异,这可能是训练中需要解决的重要问题,以提高头球表现,并有可能减轻头球的短期和长期负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信