Joshua A Bornhorst, Anna C Bitzer, Patrick L Day, Michelle Wermers, Carin Y Smith, Vanessa K Pazdernik, Ryan Pelto, Banu Sankaran, Adam Quicquaro, Paul J Jannetto
{"title":"Total Copper and Labile Bound Copper Fraction as a Selective and Sensitive Tool in the Evaluation of Wilson Disease.","authors":"Joshua A Bornhorst, Anna C Bitzer, Patrick L Day, Michelle Wermers, Carin Y Smith, Vanessa K Pazdernik, Ryan Pelto, Banu Sankaran, Adam Quicquaro, Paul J Jannetto","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A dual filtration-based method for determination of serum labile bound copper (LBC) and LBC fraction (LBC/total copper) was developed. Reduced total copper, elevated LBC, and elevated LBC fraction have been reported in Wilson disease (WD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of these markers, samples were obtained from 21 WD treatment-naïve (WD-TN, no WD treatment or <28 days of treatment) patients, 46 WD standard-of-care-treated (WD-SOC) patients, along with 246 patients representing other potential disorders of copper status. These were then compared to 213 reference interval population patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic curves for the reference population vs WD-TN yielded areas under the curve for total copper, LBC, and LBC fraction, of 0.99, 0.81, and 0.98, respectively. Using Youden cutoffs, sensitivity/specificity for WD-TN was 95%/97% for total copper, 71%/85% for LBC, and 95%/94% for LBC fraction. LBC values, but not total copper and LBC fraction, differed substantially between WD-TN and WD-SOC cohorts.We propose a dual model wherein total copper and LBC fraction results must agree to be classified as a \"positive\" or \"negative\" result for WD. This correctly classified 19/21 WD-TN patients as positive, and 194/213 reference interval patients as negative. The remaining \"indeterminate\" patients (representing approximately 9% of the reference and the WD-TN populations) exhibited conflicting total copper and LBC fraction results. When indeterminate results are excluded, this model exhibited apparent 100% sensitivity/specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agreement of total serum copper and LBC fraction classification may constitute an effective \"rule-in\" and \"rule-out\" assessment for WD-TN patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1014-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A dual filtration-based method for determination of serum labile bound copper (LBC) and LBC fraction (LBC/total copper) was developed. Reduced total copper, elevated LBC, and elevated LBC fraction have been reported in Wilson disease (WD).
Methods: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of these markers, samples were obtained from 21 WD treatment-naïve (WD-TN, no WD treatment or <28 days of treatment) patients, 46 WD standard-of-care-treated (WD-SOC) patients, along with 246 patients representing other potential disorders of copper status. These were then compared to 213 reference interval population patients.
Results: Receiver operating characteristic curves for the reference population vs WD-TN yielded areas under the curve for total copper, LBC, and LBC fraction, of 0.99, 0.81, and 0.98, respectively. Using Youden cutoffs, sensitivity/specificity for WD-TN was 95%/97% for total copper, 71%/85% for LBC, and 95%/94% for LBC fraction. LBC values, but not total copper and LBC fraction, differed substantially between WD-TN and WD-SOC cohorts.We propose a dual model wherein total copper and LBC fraction results must agree to be classified as a "positive" or "negative" result for WD. This correctly classified 19/21 WD-TN patients as positive, and 194/213 reference interval patients as negative. The remaining "indeterminate" patients (representing approximately 9% of the reference and the WD-TN populations) exhibited conflicting total copper and LBC fraction results. When indeterminate results are excluded, this model exhibited apparent 100% sensitivity/specificity.
Conclusions: Agreement of total serum copper and LBC fraction classification may constitute an effective "rule-in" and "rule-out" assessment for WD-TN patients.