{"title":"[Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].","authors":"J Liu, X Wang, R Zhang, Y H Bao, K F Gu, L P Pan","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230817-00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To measure and compare the difference of personal attenuation rating (PAR) of the workers wearing foam earplugs before and after the training, and to evaluate the effect of ear protector wearing training on the noise protection. <b>Methods:</b> In February 2023, 94 workers exposed to noise in a machinery manufacturing factory were selected as subjects. The production noise in the workplace was measured and subjects were trained to wear earplugs. The PAR values of wearing 3M 1110 foam test earplugs were measured and recorded before and after the training by using the fit testing of hearing protection device. The differences between the actual PAR values with nominal values and the noise attenuation values in related standards were compared, and the protective effect of hearing protection device before and after training was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> The average age of the subjects was (36.76±11.48) years old, the average length of service was (16.34±11.64) years, and the average exposure time to noise was (15.67±11.64) years. The noise detection results of the subjects' posts were ranged from 80.1 to 94.3 dB (A). The results of subjects wore 3M 1110 foam test earplugs for fit testing showed that the binaural PAR value after training was (19.3±6.4) dB (A), which was significantly higher than that before training (11.1±7.4) dB (A) (<i>t</i>=13.31, <i>P</i><0.001). After training, 11 people (11.70%) could reach the corrected noise reduction value (NRR value), 26 people (27.66%) could reach the standard of single noise reduction value (SNR value) ×0.6, and 84 people (89.36%) could reach the standard of (NRR-7) /2. The under protection rate of hearing protectors after training (7.45%) was significantly lower than that before training (45.74%), and the difference of different protection levels before and after training was statistically significant (χ(2)=40.83, <i>P</i><0.001) . <b>Conclusion:</b> It is suggested that enterprises should use the fit testing instead of nominal value estimation to evaluate the noise reduction effect of hearing protection device. Special training on the selection and use of hearing protection device should be strengthened, so as to ensure that workers wear them correctly and improve the protective effect of hearing protection device.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"42 8","pages":"589-593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230817-00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To measure and compare the difference of personal attenuation rating (PAR) of the workers wearing foam earplugs before and after the training, and to evaluate the effect of ear protector wearing training on the noise protection. Methods: In February 2023, 94 workers exposed to noise in a machinery manufacturing factory were selected as subjects. The production noise in the workplace was measured and subjects were trained to wear earplugs. The PAR values of wearing 3M 1110 foam test earplugs were measured and recorded before and after the training by using the fit testing of hearing protection device. The differences between the actual PAR values with nominal values and the noise attenuation values in related standards were compared, and the protective effect of hearing protection device before and after training was evaluated. Results: The average age of the subjects was (36.76±11.48) years old, the average length of service was (16.34±11.64) years, and the average exposure time to noise was (15.67±11.64) years. The noise detection results of the subjects' posts were ranged from 80.1 to 94.3 dB (A). The results of subjects wore 3M 1110 foam test earplugs for fit testing showed that the binaural PAR value after training was (19.3±6.4) dB (A), which was significantly higher than that before training (11.1±7.4) dB (A) (t=13.31, P<0.001). After training, 11 people (11.70%) could reach the corrected noise reduction value (NRR value), 26 people (27.66%) could reach the standard of single noise reduction value (SNR value) ×0.6, and 84 people (89.36%) could reach the standard of (NRR-7) /2. The under protection rate of hearing protectors after training (7.45%) was significantly lower than that before training (45.74%), and the difference of different protection levels before and after training was statistically significant (χ(2)=40.83, P<0.001) . Conclusion: It is suggested that enterprises should use the fit testing instead of nominal value estimation to evaluate the noise reduction effect of hearing protection device. Special training on the selection and use of hearing protection device should be strengthened, so as to ensure that workers wear them correctly and improve the protective effect of hearing protection device.
目的测量和比较佩戴泡沫耳塞的工人在培训前后个人衰减等级(PAR)的差异,并评估佩戴护耳器培训对噪声防护的影响。研究方法2023 年 2 月,在一家机械制造厂选取了 94 名暴露于噪声的工人作为研究对象。测量了工作场所的生产噪声,并对受试者进行了佩戴耳塞的培训。通过使用听力保护装置的密合度测试,测量并记录了培训前后佩戴 3M 1110 泡沫测试耳塞的 PAR 值。比较了实际 PAR 值与标称值以及相关标准中的噪声衰减值之间的差异,并评估了培训前后听力保护装置的保护效果。结果受试者的平均年龄为(36.76±11.48)岁,平均工龄为(16.34±11.64)年,平均接触噪声时间为(15.67±11.64)年。受试者岗位的噪声检测结果介于 80.1 至 94.3 dB (A) 之间。受试者佩戴 3M 1110 发泡测试耳塞进行密合度测试的结果显示,培训后的双耳 PAR 值为(19.3±6.4) dB (A),显著高于培训前的(11.1±7.4) dB (A)(t=13.31,PPConclusion):建议企业使用密合度测试代替标称值估算来评估听力保护装置的降噪效果。应加强听力保护装置选择和使用的专门培训,确保工人正确佩戴,提高听力保护装置的保护效果。