Integrated Strategies for Targeting Arteriogenesis and Angiogenesis After Stroke.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jing Wang, Taoying Xiong, Qisi Wu, Xinyue Qin
{"title":"Integrated Strategies for Targeting Arteriogenesis and Angiogenesis After Stroke.","authors":"Jing Wang, Taoying Xiong, Qisi Wu, Xinyue Qin","doi":"10.1007/s12975-024-01291-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interdependence between arteriogenesis and angiogenesis is crucial for enhancing perfusion by synchronously improving leptomeningeal collaterals (LMCs) and microvascular networks after stroke. However, current approaches often focus on promoting arteriogenesis and angiogenesis separately, neglecting the potential synergistic benefits of targeting both processes simultaneously. Therefore, it is imperative to consider both arteriogenesis and angiogenesis as integral and complementary strategies for post-stroke revascularization. To gain a deeper understanding of their relationships after stroke and to facilitate the development of targeted revascularization strategies, we compared them based on their timescale, space, and pathophysiology. The temporal differences in the occurrence of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis allow them to restore blood flow at different stages after stroke. The spatial differences in the effects of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis enable them to specifically target the ischemic penumbra and core infarct region. Additionally, the endothelial cell, as the primary effector cell in their pathophysiological processes, is promising target for enhancing both. Therefore, we provide an overview of key signals that regulate endothelium-mediated arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Finally, we summarize current therapeutic strategies that involve these signals to promote both processes after stroke, with the aim of inspiring future therapeutic advances in revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-024-01291-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interdependence between arteriogenesis and angiogenesis is crucial for enhancing perfusion by synchronously improving leptomeningeal collaterals (LMCs) and microvascular networks after stroke. However, current approaches often focus on promoting arteriogenesis and angiogenesis separately, neglecting the potential synergistic benefits of targeting both processes simultaneously. Therefore, it is imperative to consider both arteriogenesis and angiogenesis as integral and complementary strategies for post-stroke revascularization. To gain a deeper understanding of their relationships after stroke and to facilitate the development of targeted revascularization strategies, we compared them based on their timescale, space, and pathophysiology. The temporal differences in the occurrence of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis allow them to restore blood flow at different stages after stroke. The spatial differences in the effects of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis enable them to specifically target the ischemic penumbra and core infarct region. Additionally, the endothelial cell, as the primary effector cell in their pathophysiological processes, is promising target for enhancing both. Therefore, we provide an overview of key signals that regulate endothelium-mediated arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Finally, we summarize current therapeutic strategies that involve these signals to promote both processes after stroke, with the aim of inspiring future therapeutic advances in revascularization.

Abstract Image

针对中风后动脉生成和血管生成的综合策略。
动脉生成和血管生成之间的相互依存关系对于通过同步改善脑卒中后的脑膜袢(LMC)和微血管网络来增强灌注至关重要。然而,目前的方法往往侧重于分别促进动脉生成和血管生成,而忽视了同时针对这两个过程的潜在协同效益。因此,必须将动脉生成和血管生成视为中风后血管再通不可或缺的互补策略。为了更深入地了解中风后两者之间的关系,并促进有针对性的血管再通策略的发展,我们根据时间尺度、空间和病理生理学对两者进行了比较。动脉生成和血管生成在时间上的差异使它们能够在脑卒中后的不同阶段恢复血流。动脉生成和血管生成作用的空间差异使它们能够专门针对缺血半影和核心梗死区。此外,内皮细胞作为它们病理生理过程中的主要效应细胞,是增强这两种作用的有希望的靶点。因此,我们将概述调控内皮细胞介导的动脉生成和血管生成的关键信号。最后,我们总结了目前涉及这些信号以促进中风后这两个过程的治疗策略,目的是启发未来血管再通的治疗进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信