Comparison of different telerehabilitation protocols for urogenital symptoms in females with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07742-y
Manuela Deodato, Mia Fornasaro, Miriam Martini, Francesca Zelesnich, Arianna Sartori, Alessandra Galmonte, Alex Buoite Stella, Paolo Manganotti
{"title":"Comparison of different telerehabilitation protocols for urogenital symptoms in females with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Manuela Deodato, Mia Fornasaro, Miriam Martini, Francesca Zelesnich, Arianna Sartori, Alessandra Galmonte, Alex Buoite Stella, Paolo Manganotti","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07742-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telerehabilitation has been suggested to be equally effective than in-person rehabilitation, and could be helpful to increase participation and reduce barriers. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) often present urogenital dysfunctions, impairing independence and quality of life (QoL). Since the different available telerehabilitation protocols, the present study aimed to compare a live video urogenital rehabilitation intervention protocol (REMOTE) with a home-based pre-recorded video protocol (SELF). A randomized-controlled trial was performed, with 14 females with MS being allocated in the REMOTE group (36 ± 9 y) and 14 females in the SELF group (37 ± 7 y). Both telerehabilitation protocols were identical in terms of contents (including pelvic floor training and relaxation exercises), frequency and duration, consisting of 10 sessions of 45 min each, every 5 days. Questionnaires were administered at the beginning and the end of the study: Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) symptoms and related QoL, the main outcome being ICIQ incontinence score. Despite most of the outcomes improved in both groups, REMOTE was found to be more effective than SELF in most of the SF-36 domains (from p < 0.001 pη<sup>2</sup> 0.555 to p = 0.044 pη<sup>2</sup> 0.147), FSFI (p = 0.001 pη<sup>2</sup> 0.373), ICIQ (p = 0.003 pη<sup>2</sup> 0.291). Despite the home-based pre-recorded videos could be effective in improving urogenital symptoms, live video urogenital rehabilitation results in larger improvements. Telerehabilitation should be encouraged for urogenital dysfunctions in females with MS, and pre-recorded videos could represent an alternative when live sessions are not available. Clinical trial registration This randomized controlled trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT05984095.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5501-5509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07742-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telerehabilitation has been suggested to be equally effective than in-person rehabilitation, and could be helpful to increase participation and reduce barriers. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) often present urogenital dysfunctions, impairing independence and quality of life (QoL). Since the different available telerehabilitation protocols, the present study aimed to compare a live video urogenital rehabilitation intervention protocol (REMOTE) with a home-based pre-recorded video protocol (SELF). A randomized-controlled trial was performed, with 14 females with MS being allocated in the REMOTE group (36 ± 9 y) and 14 females in the SELF group (37 ± 7 y). Both telerehabilitation protocols were identical in terms of contents (including pelvic floor training and relaxation exercises), frequency and duration, consisting of 10 sessions of 45 min each, every 5 days. Questionnaires were administered at the beginning and the end of the study: Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) symptoms and related QoL, the main outcome being ICIQ incontinence score. Despite most of the outcomes improved in both groups, REMOTE was found to be more effective than SELF in most of the SF-36 domains (from p < 0.001 pη2 0.555 to p = 0.044 pη2 0.147), FSFI (p = 0.001 pη2 0.373), ICIQ (p = 0.003 pη2 0.291). Despite the home-based pre-recorded videos could be effective in improving urogenital symptoms, live video urogenital rehabilitation results in larger improvements. Telerehabilitation should be encouraged for urogenital dysfunctions in females with MS, and pre-recorded videos could represent an alternative when live sessions are not available. Clinical trial registration This randomized controlled trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT05984095.

Abstract Image

针对多发性硬化症女性患者泌尿生殖系统症状的不同远程康复方案比较:随机对照试验。
有研究表明,远程康复与面对面康复相比同样有效,并且有助于提高参与度和减少障碍。多发性硬化症(MS)患者经常出现泌尿生殖功能障碍,影响其独立性和生活质量(QoL)。由于现有的远程康复方案各不相同,本研究旨在比较实时视频泌尿生殖康复干预方案(REMOTE)和家庭预录视频方案(SELF)。研究人员进行了随机对照试验,将14名女性多发性硬化症患者分配到REMOTE组(36±9岁)和SELF组(37±7岁)。两种远程康复方案的内容(包括骨盆底肌训练和放松练习)、频率和持续时间均相同,均为每 5 天 10 次,每次 45 分钟。研究开始和结束时均进行了问卷调查:简表健康调查 36 (SF-36)、贝克抑郁量表 (BDI)、女性性功能指数 (FSFI)、尿失禁国际咨询问卷 (ICIQ) 症状和相关 QoL,主要结果是 ICIQ 尿失禁评分。尽管两组的大多数结果都有所改善,但在大多数 SF-36 领域(从 p 2 0.555 到 p = 0.044 pη2 0.147)、FSFI(p = 0.001 pη2 0.373)、ICIQ(p = 0.003 pη2 0.291)方面,REMOTE 比 SELF 更为有效。尽管在家预先录制的视频能有效改善泌尿生殖系统症状,但现场视频泌尿生殖系统康复治疗的改善幅度更大。应鼓励对多发性硬化症女性患者的泌尿生殖功能障碍进行远程康复治疗,在无法进行现场治疗时,预录视频可作为一种替代方法。临床试验注册 该随机对照试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,注册号为 NCT05984095。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信