Burden of illness and treatment attitudes among participants meeting Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome: A nationwide survey in the United States.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14903
Brian E Lacy, Yanqing Xu, Douglas C A Taylor, Katherine J Kosch, Rachel Dobrescu, Amy Morlock, Robert Morlock, Ceciel Rooker
{"title":"Burden of illness and treatment attitudes among participants meeting Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome: A nationwide survey in the United States.","authors":"Brian E Lacy, Yanqing Xu, Douglas C A Taylor, Katherine J Kosch, Rachel Dobrescu, Amy Morlock, Robert Morlock, Ceciel Rooker","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction characterized by abdominal pain and altered bowel habits, with patient-perceived dissatisfaction of treatment symptom control. We assessed disease burden, satisfaction with medication use, and impact on activities, in participants with IBS with constipation (IBS-C) and diarrhea (IBS-D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed data from a large, United States survey of adults querying demographics, comorbid conditions, quality of life, medication use, satisfaction with symptom control, and work productivity. Participants were grouped into the IBS-C or IBS-D cohort if they met Rome IV criteria, with controls matched 1:1 according to age, sex, race, region, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. All data were self-reported.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Nine hundred and ten participants with IBS-C and 669 with IBS-D were matched to controls. The most reported symptoms were abdominal discomfort for IBS-C and abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort for IBS-D. Among the IBS-C and IBS-D cohorts, 74.2% and 65.9%, respectively, took prescription and/or over-the-counter medication for their symptoms. Respondents were more dissatisfied than satisfied with control of their symptoms. Respondents taking prescription medication(s) with or without over-the-counter medication(s) reported better symptom control than respondents only taking over-the-counter medications (p < 0.001). There was significantly higher mean presenteeism, work productivity loss, and daily activity impairment (p < 0.001 for all) in respondents with IBS compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>This study provides insight into respondents' experiences of IBS symptoms, including the impact on daily activity, as well as satisfaction with control of symptoms and prescription and over-the-counter medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction characterized by abdominal pain and altered bowel habits, with patient-perceived dissatisfaction of treatment symptom control. We assessed disease burden, satisfaction with medication use, and impact on activities, in participants with IBS with constipation (IBS-C) and diarrhea (IBS-D).

Methods: This study assessed data from a large, United States survey of adults querying demographics, comorbid conditions, quality of life, medication use, satisfaction with symptom control, and work productivity. Participants were grouped into the IBS-C or IBS-D cohort if they met Rome IV criteria, with controls matched 1:1 according to age, sex, race, region, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. All data were self-reported.

Key results: Nine hundred and ten participants with IBS-C and 669 with IBS-D were matched to controls. The most reported symptoms were abdominal discomfort for IBS-C and abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort for IBS-D. Among the IBS-C and IBS-D cohorts, 74.2% and 65.9%, respectively, took prescription and/or over-the-counter medication for their symptoms. Respondents were more dissatisfied than satisfied with control of their symptoms. Respondents taking prescription medication(s) with or without over-the-counter medication(s) reported better symptom control than respondents only taking over-the-counter medications (p < 0.001). There was significantly higher mean presenteeism, work productivity loss, and daily activity impairment (p < 0.001 for all) in respondents with IBS compared with controls.

Conclusions and inferences: This study provides insight into respondents' experiences of IBS symptoms, including the impact on daily activity, as well as satisfaction with control of symptoms and prescription and over-the-counter medications.

符合罗马IV标准的肠易激综合征患者的疾病负担和治疗态度:美国全国性调查。
背景:肠易激综合征(IBS)是一种肠道与大脑相互作用紊乱的疾病,以腹痛和排便习惯改变为特征,患者对治疗症状控制感到不满意。我们对患有肠易激综合征伴便秘(IBS-C)和腹泻(IBS-D)的患者的疾病负担、用药满意度以及对活动的影响进行了评估:本研究评估了美国一项大型成人调查的数据,调查内容包括人口统计学、合并症、生活质量、药物使用、症状控制满意度和工作效率。如果参与者符合罗马IV标准,则将其归入IBS-C或IBS-D队列,对照组则根据年龄、性别、种族、地区和Charlson合并症指数评分进行1:1配对。所有数据均为自我报告:主要结果:91 名 IBS-C 患者和 669 名 IBS-D 患者与对照组进行了配对。IBS-C患者报告最多的症状是腹部不适,IBS-D患者报告最多的症状是腹痛和腹部不适。在 IBS-C 和 IBS-D 组群中,分别有 74.2% 和 65.9% 的人服用处方药和/或非处方药来缓解症状。受访者对症状控制的不满意度高于满意度。与只服用非处方药的受访者相比,服用处方药并同时服用或不服用非处方药的受访者对症状的控制更好(p 结论和推论:本研究有助于深入了解受访者对肠易激综合征症状的体验,包括对日常活动的影响,以及对症状控制、处方药和非处方药的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信