Quality of Life after Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Does the Target Matter?

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sandra Murcia Carretero, Katrin Petermann, Ines Debove, Deborah Amstutz, Mário Sousa, Julia Waskönig, Andreas Antonios Diamantaras, Gerd Tinkhauser, Andreas Nowacki, Claudio Pollo, Michael Schuepbach, Paul Krack, Martin Lenard Lachenmayer
{"title":"Quality of Life after Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Does the Target Matter?","authors":"Sandra Murcia Carretero, Katrin Petermann, Ines Debove, Deborah Amstutz, Mário Sousa, Julia Waskönig, Andreas Antonios Diamantaras, Gerd Tinkhauser, Andreas Nowacki, Claudio Pollo, Michael Schuepbach, Paul Krack, Martin Lenard Lachenmayer","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an accepted therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) with disabling motor complications. For elderly patients with poorer cognition and postural instability, GPi has been proposed as the preferable DBS target based on expert opinion, arguing GPi-DBS may be less complicated by depression, apathy, worsened verbal fluency, and executive dysfunction, resulting in greater improvement in quality of life (QoL). However, data supporting such patient-tailored approach are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to analyze whether the DBS target influences QoL in a PD cohort and a matched subgroup of frail patients with poor cognitive status and reduced postural stability, and whether other factors affect the QoL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed a single-center cohort of 138 PD patients who received bilateral STN-DBS (117) or GPi-DBS (21) using the mentioned approach for target selection. All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluations of motor- and nonmotor signs as well as QoL before and 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS of both targets improved motor signs, dyskinesias, and pain. QoL improved without significant difference between the targets, but with a trend for greater improvement across all QoL domains in favor of the STN, even in an STN subgroup matched to the GPi group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results contradict the prevailing belief that GPi-DBS is superior in frail PD patients with cognitive decline and postural instability, questioning the proposed patient-tailored approach of DBS target selection. Further studies are needed for a data-driven approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an accepted therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) with disabling motor complications. For elderly patients with poorer cognition and postural instability, GPi has been proposed as the preferable DBS target based on expert opinion, arguing GPi-DBS may be less complicated by depression, apathy, worsened verbal fluency, and executive dysfunction, resulting in greater improvement in quality of life (QoL). However, data supporting such patient-tailored approach are lacking.

Objectives: The aims were to analyze whether the DBS target influences QoL in a PD cohort and a matched subgroup of frail patients with poor cognitive status and reduced postural stability, and whether other factors affect the QoL outcomes.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed a single-center cohort of 138 PD patients who received bilateral STN-DBS (117) or GPi-DBS (21) using the mentioned approach for target selection. All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluations of motor- and nonmotor signs as well as QoL before and 1 year after surgery.

Results: DBS of both targets improved motor signs, dyskinesias, and pain. QoL improved without significant difference between the targets, but with a trend for greater improvement across all QoL domains in favor of the STN, even in an STN subgroup matched to the GPi group.

Conclusion: Our results contradict the prevailing belief that GPi-DBS is superior in frail PD patients with cognitive decline and postural instability, questioning the proposed patient-tailored approach of DBS target selection. Further studies are needed for a data-driven approach.

帕金森病患者脑深部刺激后的生活质量:目标是否重要?
背景:眼下核(STN)和苍白球内核(GPi)的深部脑刺激(DBS)是治疗帕金森病(PD)致残性运动并发症的公认疗法。对于认知能力较差和体位不稳的老年患者,根据专家的意见,GPi 被认为是较佳的 DBS 靶点,认为 GPi-DBS 可减少抑郁、冷漠、言语流畅性恶化和执行功能障碍等并发症,从而更大程度地改善生活质量(QoL)。然而,目前还缺乏支持这种为患者量身定制的方法的数据:目的:分析 DBS 靶点是否影响认知状况差、姿势稳定性降低的帕金森病队列和匹配亚组体弱患者的 QoL,以及是否有其他因素影响 QoL 结果:在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了一个单中心队列中的 138 例 PD 患者,这些患者接受了双侧 STN-DBS(117 例)或 GPi-DBS(21 例),并采用了上述方法进行靶点选择。所有患者在术前和术后一年都接受了运动和非运动体征以及 QoL 的标准化临床评估:结果:两个靶点的 DBS 均改善了运动症状、运动障碍和疼痛。QoL的改善在两个靶点之间无明显差异,但在所有QoL领域,STN的改善趋势更明显,甚至在与GPi组匹配的STN亚组中也是如此:我们的研究结果与普遍认为 GPi-DBS 在认知功能下降和姿势不稳的虚弱型帕金森病患者中更具优势的观点相悖,这也对所提出的根据患者情况选择 DBS 靶点的方法提出了质疑。需要进一步研究数据驱动的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信