Healthcare Stakeholder Perspectives on a Value Assessment Approach for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Therapies.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S458181
Ryan Fischer, Pat Furlong, Annie Kennedy, Kelly Maynard, Marissa Penrod, Debra Miller, Chamindra G Laverty, Linda P Lowes, Nancy L Kuntz, Perry B Shieh, Jane Kondejewski, Peter J Neumann, Jason Shafrin, Richard J Willke
{"title":"Healthcare Stakeholder Perspectives on a Value Assessment Approach for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Therapies.","authors":"Ryan Fischer, Pat Furlong, Annie Kennedy, Kelly Maynard, Marissa Penrod, Debra Miller, Chamindra G Laverty, Linda P Lowes, Nancy L Kuntz, Perry B Shieh, Jane Kondejewski, Peter J Neumann, Jason Shafrin, Richard J Willke","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S458181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional value assessment frameworks are challenged in comprehensively assessing the societal value new therapies bring to individuals with rare, progressive, genetic, fatal, neuromuscular diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The objective of this study was to identify how value assessment frameworks may need to be adapted to measure the value to society of DMD therapies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Three stakeholder groups (6 patient advocates, 4 clinicians, 3 health economists; N = 13) participated in semi-structured interviews around the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research's Value Flower, which includes elements to consider within value assessments of healthcare technologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All stakeholders agreed that traditional value assessment frameworks based on the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) are narrow and will undervalue new DMD therapies. All stakeholders expressed some level of concern that using the QALY as a key metric of value discriminates against patients with severe progressive diseases and disabilities. Some stakeholders saw value in using the QALY for cross-disease comparisons in resource-constrained environments if the methodology was appropriate. All stakeholders recommended considering additional elements of value in decision-making around new DMD therapies. These elements reflect: economic and humanistic costs incurred by patients, caregivers, and families with Duchenne, such as indirect out-of-pocket costs, lost productivity, and family spillovers; meaningful attributes for individuals with disabilities and high unmet need, such as severity of disease, value of hope, and real option value; and factors that contribute to improvements in population health, such as insurance value, equity, and scientific spillovers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the need to expand traditional value assessment frameworks and take a holistic approach that incorporates the perspectives of individuals with Duchenne, caregivers, clinicians, and health economists when assessing the societal value of new DMD therapies. Broadening value assessment will prevent restricted or delayed access to therapies for individuals with Duchenne.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S458181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Traditional value assessment frameworks are challenged in comprehensively assessing the societal value new therapies bring to individuals with rare, progressive, genetic, fatal, neuromuscular diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The objective of this study was to identify how value assessment frameworks may need to be adapted to measure the value to society of DMD therapies.

Patients and methods: Three stakeholder groups (6 patient advocates, 4 clinicians, 3 health economists; N = 13) participated in semi-structured interviews around the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research's Value Flower, which includes elements to consider within value assessments of healthcare technologies.

Results: All stakeholders agreed that traditional value assessment frameworks based on the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) are narrow and will undervalue new DMD therapies. All stakeholders expressed some level of concern that using the QALY as a key metric of value discriminates against patients with severe progressive diseases and disabilities. Some stakeholders saw value in using the QALY for cross-disease comparisons in resource-constrained environments if the methodology was appropriate. All stakeholders recommended considering additional elements of value in decision-making around new DMD therapies. These elements reflect: economic and humanistic costs incurred by patients, caregivers, and families with Duchenne, such as indirect out-of-pocket costs, lost productivity, and family spillovers; meaningful attributes for individuals with disabilities and high unmet need, such as severity of disease, value of hope, and real option value; and factors that contribute to improvements in population health, such as insurance value, equity, and scientific spillovers.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the need to expand traditional value assessment frameworks and take a holistic approach that incorporates the perspectives of individuals with Duchenne, caregivers, clinicians, and health economists when assessing the societal value of new DMD therapies. Broadening value assessment will prevent restricted or delayed access to therapies for individuals with Duchenne.

医疗利益相关者对杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症疗法价值评估方法的看法。
目的:传统的价值评估框架在全面评估新疗法为杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)等罕见、进展性、遗传性、致命性神经肌肉疾病患者带来的社会价值方面面临挑战。本研究的目的是确定如何调整价值评估框架,以衡量 DMD 疗法的社会价值:三组利益相关者(6 名患者权益倡导者、4 名临床医生、3 名卫生经济学家;N = 13)参加了围绕国际药物经济学与结果研究学会价值之花进行的半结构化访谈,该价值之花包括医疗保健技术价值评估中应考虑的要素:所有利益相关者都认为,基于质量调整生命年 (QALY) 的传统价值评估框架过于狭隘,会低估 DMD 新疗法的价值。所有利益相关者都表达了某种程度的担忧,即使用 QALY 作为价值的关键指标会歧视严重进展性疾病和残疾患者。一些利益相关者认为,如果方法适当,在资源有限的环境中使用 QALY 进行跨疾病比较是有价值的。所有利益相关者都建议在围绕 DMD 新疗法进行决策时考虑更多价值要素。这些要素反映了:杜氏综合征患者、照护者和家庭的经济和人文成本,如间接自付成本、生产力损失和家庭溢出效应;对残疾人和高需求未得到满足的个体有意义的属性,如疾病的严重程度、希望的价值和实际选择价值;以及有助于改善人口健康的因素,如保险价值、公平性和科学溢出效应:这些研究结果突出表明,在评估 DMD 新疗法的社会价值时,有必要扩展传统的价值评估框架,并采取综合方法,纳入杜兴氏症患者、护理人员、临床医生和卫生经济学家的观点。扩大价值评估范围将防止杜兴氏症患者在获得疗法方面受到限制或延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信