Salvage hysterectomy for persistent residual cervical cancer: assessment of prognostic factors.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Munetaka Takekuma, Koji Matsuo, Shinya Matsuzaki, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Toyomi Satoh
{"title":"Salvage hysterectomy for persistent residual cervical cancer: assessment of prognostic factors.","authors":"Munetaka Takekuma, Koji Matsuo, Shinya Matsuzaki, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Toyomi Satoh","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of 99 patients who underwent salvage hysterectomy for residual disease in the uterine cervix following the completion of definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer across 25 Japan Clinical Oncology Group-affiliated centers from 2005-2014, (i) time duration from the completion of definitive radiotherapy to the diagnosis of residual disease in the uterine cervix, (ii) salvage hysterectomy surgical margin status, and (iii) extent of residual disease, were independently associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, (i) time duration to identify residual disease of >62 days was associated with decreased PFS compared to ≤62 days (4-year rates 21.8% vs. 55.0%, adjusted-hazard ratio [aHR]=2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.55-4.67); (ii) presence of tumor in the surgical margin of hysterectomy specimen was associated with 4 times increased risk of disease progression compared to tumor-free surgical margin (4-year PFS rates 0% vs. 45.3%, aHR=4.27, 95% CI=2.20-8.29); and (iii) hazards of disease progression was 4.5-fold increased when the residual disease extended beyond the uterine cervix compared to residual disease within the uterine cervix only (4-year PFS rates 11.1% vs. 50.6%, aHR=4.54, 95% CI=2.60-7.95). In the absence of these 3 prognostic factors, 4-year PFS rate reached nearly 80% (78.6%, SAL-HYS criteria). In sum, these data suggested that early detection of persistent, residual disease following definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer may be the key to improve survival if salvage hysterectomy is considered as a tailored treatment option. Ideal surgical candidate would be uterine cervix-contained disease and assurance of adequate tumor-free surgical margin.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of 99 patients who underwent salvage hysterectomy for residual disease in the uterine cervix following the completion of definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer across 25 Japan Clinical Oncology Group-affiliated centers from 2005-2014, (i) time duration from the completion of definitive radiotherapy to the diagnosis of residual disease in the uterine cervix, (ii) salvage hysterectomy surgical margin status, and (iii) extent of residual disease, were independently associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, (i) time duration to identify residual disease of >62 days was associated with decreased PFS compared to ≤62 days (4-year rates 21.8% vs. 55.0%, adjusted-hazard ratio [aHR]=2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.55-4.67); (ii) presence of tumor in the surgical margin of hysterectomy specimen was associated with 4 times increased risk of disease progression compared to tumor-free surgical margin (4-year PFS rates 0% vs. 45.3%, aHR=4.27, 95% CI=2.20-8.29); and (iii) hazards of disease progression was 4.5-fold increased when the residual disease extended beyond the uterine cervix compared to residual disease within the uterine cervix only (4-year PFS rates 11.1% vs. 50.6%, aHR=4.54, 95% CI=2.60-7.95). In the absence of these 3 prognostic factors, 4-year PFS rate reached nearly 80% (78.6%, SAL-HYS criteria). In sum, these data suggested that early detection of persistent, residual disease following definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer may be the key to improve survival if salvage hysterectomy is considered as a tailored treatment option. Ideal surgical candidate would be uterine cervix-contained disease and assurance of adequate tumor-free surgical margin.

针对持续残留宫颈癌的挽救性子宫切除术:预后因素评估。
在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,研究对象是2005-2014年期间在25个日本临床肿瘤学组附属中心接受宫颈癌明确放疗后因宫颈残留疾病而接受挽救性子宫切除术的99例患者、(i)从完成最终放疗到确诊宫颈残留疾病的时间长度、(ii)挽救性子宫切除术的手术切缘状态和(iii)残留疾病的范围与无进展生存期(PFS)独立相关。具体来说,(i)与≤62天相比,发现残留疾病的时间>62天与无进展生存期缩短有关(4年生存率为21.8% vs. 55.0%,调整危险比[aHR]=2.69,95%置信区间[CI]=1.55-4.67);(ii)与无肿瘤手术切缘相比,子宫切除术标本手术切缘存在肿瘤与疾病进展风险增加4倍有关(4年生存率为0% vs. 45.3%,调整危险比[aHR]=2.69,95%置信区间[CI]=1.55-4.67)。45.3%,aHR=4.27,95% CI=2.20-8.29);(iii) 与仅在子宫颈内的残留疾病相比,当残留疾病扩展到子宫颈以外时,疾病进展的危险性增加 4.5 倍(4 年 PFS 率为 11.1% vs. 50.6%,aHR=4.54,95% CI=2.60-7.95)。如果没有这3个预后因素,4年生存率接近80%(78.6%,SAL-HYS标准)。总之,这些数据表明,如果考虑将挽救性子宫切除术作为一种有针对性的治疗方案,那么早期发现宫颈癌明确放疗后的持续性残留疾病可能是提高生存率的关键。理想的手术候选者是子宫颈残留疾病,并确保有足够的无肿瘤手术切缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信