Xiao Wang MD, Hong Zhang MD, Xiaojun Bai MD, Li Zhang MD, Chengxiang Li MD, Xiaobo Mao MD, Jue Chen MD, Jianfang Luo MD, Yan Zhao MD, Binquan Zhou MD, Bei'an You MD, Yuelan Zhang MD, Likun Ma MD, Zhimin Du MD, Yan Chen MD, Fucheng Sun MD, Chunguang Qiu MD, Zhujun Shen MD, Shangyu Wen MD, Gary S. Mintz MD, Fei Ye MD, Shaoping Nie MD, PhD, China Rota Elite Group
{"title":"Practices and outcomes of rotational atherectomy in China: The Rota China registry","authors":"Xiao Wang MD, Hong Zhang MD, Xiaojun Bai MD, Li Zhang MD, Chengxiang Li MD, Xiaobo Mao MD, Jue Chen MD, Jianfang Luo MD, Yan Zhao MD, Binquan Zhou MD, Bei'an You MD, Yuelan Zhang MD, Likun Ma MD, Zhimin Du MD, Yan Chen MD, Fucheng Sun MD, Chunguang Qiu MD, Zhujun Shen MD, Shangyu Wen MD, Gary S. Mintz MD, Fei Ye MD, Shaoping Nie MD, PhD, China Rota Elite Group","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains an integral tool for the treatment of severe coronary calcified lesions despite emergence of newer techniques. We aimed to evaluate the contemporary clinical practices and outcomes of RA in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Rota China Registry (NCT03806621) was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter registry based on China Rota Elite Group. Consecutive patients treated with RA were recruited. A pre-designed, standardized protocol was recommended for the RA procedure. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between July 2018 and December 2020, 980 patients were enrolled at 19 sites in China. Mean patient age was 68.4 years, and 61.4% were men. Radial access was used in 79.1% patients, and 32.7% procedures were guided by intravascular imaging. A total of 22.6% procedures used more than 1 burr, and the maximal burr size was ≥1.75 mm in 24.4% cases, with burr upsizing in 19.3% cases, achieving a final burr-to-artery ratio of 0.52. Procedural success was achieved in 91.1% of patients, and the rate of 30-day and 1-year MACE was 4.9% and 8.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified the total lesion length (HR 1.014, 95% CI: 1.002–1.027; <i>p</i> = 0.021) as predictor of 30-day MACE, and renal insufficiency (HR 1.916, 95% CI: 1.073–3.420; <i>p</i> = 0.028) as predictor of 1-year MACE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this contemporary prospective registry in China, the use of RA was effective in achieving high procedural success rate with good short- and long-term outcomes in patients with severely calcified lesions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"104 4","pages":"664-675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains an integral tool for the treatment of severe coronary calcified lesions despite emergence of newer techniques. We aimed to evaluate the contemporary clinical practices and outcomes of RA in China.
Methods
The Rota China Registry (NCT03806621) was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter registry based on China Rota Elite Group. Consecutive patients treated with RA were recruited. A pre-designed, standardized protocol was recommended for the RA procedure. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success.
Results
Between July 2018 and December 2020, 980 patients were enrolled at 19 sites in China. Mean patient age was 68.4 years, and 61.4% were men. Radial access was used in 79.1% patients, and 32.7% procedures were guided by intravascular imaging. A total of 22.6% procedures used more than 1 burr, and the maximal burr size was ≥1.75 mm in 24.4% cases, with burr upsizing in 19.3% cases, achieving a final burr-to-artery ratio of 0.52. Procedural success was achieved in 91.1% of patients, and the rate of 30-day and 1-year MACE was 4.9% and 8.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified the total lesion length (HR 1.014, 95% CI: 1.002–1.027; p = 0.021) as predictor of 30-day MACE, and renal insufficiency (HR 1.916, 95% CI: 1.073–3.420; p = 0.028) as predictor of 1-year MACE.
Conclusions
In this contemporary prospective registry in China, the use of RA was effective in achieving high procedural success rate with good short- and long-term outcomes in patients with severely calcified lesions.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.